• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

男科问卷的可读性和可理解性。

Readability and understandability of andrology questionnaires.

作者信息

Atalay Hasan Anıl, Çetinkaya Gökhan, Agalarov Samir, Özbir Sait, Çulha Gökhan, Canat Lütfi

机构信息

Department of Urology, Health Sciences University, Okmeydanı Teaching and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.

Department of Turkish Language Teaching, Niğde Ömer Halisdemir University, Niğde, Turkey.

出版信息

Turk J Urol. 2018 Nov 26;45(3):171-176. doi: 10.5152/tud.2018.75272. Print 2019 May.

DOI:10.5152/tud.2018.75272
PMID:30484766
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6469730/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Medical questionnaires, which enable collection, comparison and analysis of appropriate data as a means of written communication between a patient and a doctor, must be easily readable, and understandable. Here, we measure the readability and understandability of questionnaires used in andrology and examine the relationship between the educational status of the patients and the understandability of the forms.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Seven questionnaires (SHIM, AIPE, IIEF, MSHQ-EjD, PEDT, NIH-CPSI and IPSS) used to diagnose andological diseases were selected from the European Association of Urology guidelines. The number of syllables per word, the number of words in a sentence, and the average word and sentence lengths were calculated for each Turkish validated form. Readability scores were calculated, and closet tests were used to measure the understandability of the texts.

RESULTS

Three hundred and twenty-seven male volunteers participated in the study. Two hundred and sixteen of the participants (66%) had a high school or college education. The readability level of the seven forms was determined to be "Difficult" or "Very Difficult," and at least a high school education level was required to understand the forms. As education level and monthly income increased, the understandability of the forms increased; as the readability of the forms became more difficult, their understandability decreased (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

The readability levels of questionnaires used in andrology are well above the reading level of Turkey. Health providers can help patients to fill out forms to increase doctor-patient communication.

摘要

目的

医学问卷作为患者与医生之间书面沟通的一种方式,能够收集、比较和分析适当的数据,必须易于阅读和理解。在此,我们评估男科问卷的可读性和可理解性,并研究患者教育程度与问卷可理解性之间的关系。

材料与方法

从欧洲泌尿外科学会指南中选取七份用于诊断男科疾病的问卷(SHIM、AIPE、IIEF、MSHQ-EjD、PEDT、NIH-CPSI和IPSS)。计算每份经土耳其语验证的问卷的单词音节数、句子中的单词数以及平均单词和句子长度。计算可读性得分,并使用封闭测试来衡量文本的可理解性。

结果

327名男性志愿者参与了该研究。其中216名参与者(66%)具有高中或大学学历。这七份问卷的可读性水平被确定为“困难”或“非常困难”,理解这些问卷至少需要高中学历水平。随着教育水平和月收入的提高,问卷的可理解性增加;随着问卷可读性变得更难,其可理解性降低(p<0.001)。

结论

男科问卷的可读性水平远高于土耳其的阅读水平。医疗服务提供者可以帮助患者填写问卷以加强医患沟通。

相似文献

1
Readability and understandability of andrology questionnaires.男科问卷的可读性和可理解性。
Turk J Urol. 2018 Nov 26;45(3):171-176. doi: 10.5152/tud.2018.75272. Print 2019 May.
2
Are Online Zenker's Diverticulum Materials Readable and Understandable?在线的Zenker憩室资料是否易于阅读和理解?
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Nov;155(5):758-763. doi: 10.1177/0194599816655302. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
3
Readability and Understandability of Online Vocal Cord Paralysis Materials.在线声带麻痹资料的可读性和易懂性。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Mar;154(3):460-4. doi: 10.1177/0194599815626146. Epub 2016 Feb 9.
4
Is There a Difference Between the Readabilities of Informed Consent Forms Used for Elective and Emergency Procedures in Turkey?土耳其用于选择性和急诊手术的知情同意书的可读性是否存在差异?
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2020 May;54(3):626-630. doi: 10.1007/s43441-019-00096-0. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
5
How readable are Australian multilingual diabetes patient education materials? An evaluation of national English-language source texts.澳大利亚的多语言糖尿病患者教育材料可读性如何?对国家英语源文本的评估。
Public Health Res Pract. 2020 Mar 10;30(1):3012002. doi: 10.17061/phrp3012002.
6
The comparison of premature ejaculation assessment questionnaires and their sensitivity for the four premature ejaculation syndromes: results from the Turkish society of andrology sexual health survey.早泄评估问卷的比较及其对四种早泄综合征的敏感性:来自土耳其性医学协会性健康调查的结果。
J Sex Med. 2011 Apr;8(4):1177-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.02183.x. Epub 2011 Jan 26.
7
Assessment of readability, understandability, and completeness of pediatric hospital medicine discharge instructions.评估儿科医院出院指导的可读性、易懂性和完整性。
J Hosp Med. 2017 Feb;12(2):98-101. doi: 10.12788/jhm.2688.
8
How Effective Are Patient Education Materials in Educating Patients?患者教育材料在教育患者方面的效果如何?
Clin Nurs Res. 2019 Jun;28(5):567-582. doi: 10.1177/1054773817740521. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
9
Quality, Readability, and Understandability of German Booklets Addressing Melanoma Patients.针对黑色素瘤患者的德语宣传册的质量、可读性和易懂性。
J Cancer Educ. 2019 Aug;34(4):760-767. doi: 10.1007/s13187-018-1369-x.
10
Readability assessment of commonly used urological questionnaires.常用泌尿科问卷的可读性评估。
Investig Clin Urol. 2018 Sep;59(5):297-304. doi: 10.4111/icu.2018.59.5.297. Epub 2018 Aug 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Omit needless words: Sentence length perception.省略不必要的词:句子长度感知。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 24;18(2):e0282146. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282146. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Development of a questionnaire to measure patient-reported postoperative recovery: content validity and intra-patient reliability.用于测量患者报告的术后恢复情况的问卷的开发:内容效度和患者内信度。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2009 Jun;15(3):411-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.01027.x. Epub 2009 Apr 2.
2
Patients' perspectives of the doctor-patient relationship and information giving across a range of literacy levels.不同文化程度患者对医患关系及信息提供的看法。
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Apr;75(1):114-20. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.09.026. Epub 2008 Nov 28.
3
Readability statistics of patient information leaflets in a Speech and Language Therapy Department.言语治疗科患者信息手册的可读性统计
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2008 Nov-Dec;43(6):712-22. doi: 10.1080/13682820701726647.
4
Readability of notice of privacy forms used by major health care institutions.
JAMA. 2005 Apr 6;293(13):1593-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.13.1593.
5
Readable writing by scientists and researchers.
J Environ Health. 2001 Apr;63(8):40-1.
6
Health literacy among Medicare enrollees in a managed care organization.管理式医疗组织中医疗保险参保人的健康素养
JAMA. 1999 Feb 10;281(6):545-51. doi: 10.1001/jama.281.6.545.