• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在随机扫视眼动追踪任务中五种注视类型的证据以及注视持续时间随任务执行时间的变化。

Evidence for five types of fixation during a random saccade eye tracking task and changes in fixation duration as a function of time-on-task.

作者信息

Friedman Lee, Komogortsev Oleg V

机构信息

Department of Computer Science, Texas State University, San Marcos, Texas, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Sep 16;19(9):e0310436. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310436. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0310436
PMID:39283870
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11404824/
Abstract

Our interest was to evaluate changes in fixation duration as a function of time-on-task (TOT) during a random saccade task. We employed a large, publicly available dataset. The frequency histogram of fixation durations was multimodal and modelled as a Gaussian mixture. For this specific task, we found five fixation types. The "ideal" response would be a single accurate saccade after each target movement, with a typical saccade latency of 200-250 msec, followed by a long fixation (> 800 msec) until the next target jump. We found fixations like this, but they comprised only 10% of all fixations and were the first fixation after target movement only 23.4% of the time. More frequently (57.4% of the time), the first fixation after target movement was short (117.7 msec mean) and was commonly followed by a corrective saccade. Across the entire 100 sec of the task, median total fixation duration decreased. This decrease was approximated with a power law fit with R2 = 0.94. A detailed examination of the frequency of each of our five fixation types over time on task (TOT) revealed that the three shortest duration fixation types became more and more frequent with TOT whereas the two longest fixations became less and less frequent. In all cases, the changes over TOT followed power law relationships, with R2 values between 0.73 and 0.93. We concluded that, over the 100 second duration of our task, long fixations are common in the first 15 to 22 seconds but become less common after that. Short fixations are relatively uncommon in the first 15 to 22 seconds but become more and more common as the task progressed. Apparently. the ability to produce an ideal response, although somewhat likely in the first 22 seconds, rapidly declines. This might be related to a noted decline in saccade accuracy over time.

摘要

我们感兴趣的是在随机扫视任务中,评估注视持续时间随任务执行时间(TOT)的变化。我们使用了一个大型的公开可用数据集。注视持续时间的频率直方图是多峰的,并被建模为高斯混合模型。对于这个特定任务,我们发现了五种注视类型。“理想”的反应应该是在每个目标移动后进行一次精确的扫视,典型的扫视潜伏期为200 - 250毫秒,随后是长时间的注视(> 800毫秒),直到下一个目标跳跃。我们发现了这样的注视,但它们仅占所有注视的10%,并且仅在23.4%的时间里是目标移动后的首次注视。更常见的情况(57.4%的时间)是,目标移动后的首次注视很短(平均117.7毫秒),并且通常随后会有一次校正扫视。在整个100秒的任务过程中,总注视持续时间的中位数下降了。这种下降可以用幂律拟合来近似,R2 = 0.94。对我们五种注视类型在任务执行时间(TOT)上的频率进行详细检查发现,三种持续时间最短的注视类型随着TOT变得越来越频繁,而两种最长的注视则变得越来越不频繁。在所有情况下,TOT上的变化都遵循幂律关系,R2值在0.73到0.93之间。我们得出结论,在我们任务的100秒持续时间内,长时间注视在前15到22秒很常见,但之后变得不那么常见。短时间注视在前15到22秒相对不常见,但随着任务的进行变得越来越常见。显然,产生理想反应的能力,尽管在前22秒有一定可能性,但会迅速下降。这可能与随着时间推移扫视准确性的明显下降有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1274/11404824/2b46f8be581b/pone.0310436.g022.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1274/11404824/1170e9a99184/pone.0310436.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1274/11404824/0cbddbf9239f/pone.0310436.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1274/11404824/291478017be1/pone.0310436.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1274/11404824/184b7f531852/pone.0310436.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1274/11404824/6994cdf8dcd9/pone.0310436.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1274/11404824/4a9a1897cd52/pone.0310436.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1274/11404824/26e711b44f4e/pone.0310436.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1274/11404824/d7abd68a0afc/pone.0310436.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1274/11404824/07147d26fb6a/pone.0310436.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1274/11404824/b58ceb3ef78e/pone.0310436.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1274/11404824/120643194bc7/pone.0310436.g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1274/11404824/1b9b71fb3541/pone.0310436.g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1274/11404824/18eeedf1d813/pone.0310436.g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1274/11404824/263815963078/pone.0310436.g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1274/11404824/2a02a0a2452a/pone.0310436.g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1274/11404824/2b04524fa8e1/pone.0310436.g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1274/11404824/0615542369a8/pone.0310436.g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1274/11404824/284a5cf51a43/pone.0310436.g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1274/11404824/8a273bc59589/pone.0310436.g019.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1274/11404824/65b33d9c3939/pone.0310436.g020.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1274/11404824/44ccc9f5a71e/pone.0310436.g021.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1274/11404824/2b46f8be581b/pone.0310436.g022.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1274/11404824/1170e9a99184/pone.0310436.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1274/11404824/0cbddbf9239f/pone.0310436.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1274/11404824/291478017be1/pone.0310436.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1274/11404824/184b7f531852/pone.0310436.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1274/11404824/6994cdf8dcd9/pone.0310436.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1274/11404824/4a9a1897cd52/pone.0310436.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1274/11404824/26e711b44f4e/pone.0310436.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1274/11404824/d7abd68a0afc/pone.0310436.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1274/11404824/07147d26fb6a/pone.0310436.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1274/11404824/b58ceb3ef78e/pone.0310436.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1274/11404824/120643194bc7/pone.0310436.g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1274/11404824/1b9b71fb3541/pone.0310436.g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1274/11404824/18eeedf1d813/pone.0310436.g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1274/11404824/263815963078/pone.0310436.g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1274/11404824/2a02a0a2452a/pone.0310436.g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1274/11404824/2b04524fa8e1/pone.0310436.g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1274/11404824/0615542369a8/pone.0310436.g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1274/11404824/284a5cf51a43/pone.0310436.g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1274/11404824/8a273bc59589/pone.0310436.g019.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1274/11404824/65b33d9c3939/pone.0310436.g020.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1274/11404824/44ccc9f5a71e/pone.0310436.g021.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1274/11404824/2b46f8be581b/pone.0310436.g022.jpg

相似文献

1
Evidence for five types of fixation during a random saccade eye tracking task and changes in fixation duration as a function of time-on-task.在随机扫视眼动追踪任务中五种注视类型的证据以及注视持续时间随任务执行时间的变化。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 16;19(9):e0310436. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310436. eCollection 2024.
2
The role of fixation disengagement and oculomotor preparation in gap saccade task is gap-duration dependent.在间隙眼跳任务中,注视脱离和眼动准备的作用与间隙持续时间有关。
J Neurophysiol. 2021 Dec 1;126(6):2053-2064. doi: 10.1152/jn.00259.2021. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
3
Saccadic reaction time in the monkey: advanced preparation of oculomotor programs is primarily responsible for express saccade occurrence.猴子的扫视反应时间:眼动程序的提前准备是快速扫视发生的主要原因。
J Neurophysiol. 1996 Dec;76(6):3666-81. doi: 10.1152/jn.1996.76.6.3666.
4
Saccade programming during short duration fixations: an examination of copy typing, letter detection, and reading.短时间注视期间的扫视编程:对复制打字、字母检测和阅读的一项研究。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 1992 Oct;81(1):1-21. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(92)90008-2.
5
Predictive saccade target selection in superior colliculus during visual search.上丘在视觉搜索中预测性扫视目标选择。
J Neurosci. 2014 Apr 16;34(16):5640-8. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3880-13.2014.
6
Human express saccade makers are impaired at suppressing visually evoked saccades.人类快速眼动扫视生成者在抑制视觉诱发的扫视方面存在缺陷。
J Neurophysiol. 1996 Jul;76(1):199-214. doi: 10.1152/jn.1996.76.1.199.
7
Individuals exhibit idiosyncratic eye-movement behavior profiles across tasks.个体在不同任务中表现出独特的眼动行为模式。
Vision Res. 2013 Aug 30;89:32-8. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2013.07.002. Epub 2013 Jul 16.
8
The role of fixation disengagement in the parallel programming of sequences of saccades.在眼跳序列的并行编程中,固定解除的作用。
Exp Brain Res. 2019 Nov;237(11):3033-3045. doi: 10.1007/s00221-019-05641-9. Epub 2019 Sep 17.
9
Short-latency allocentric control of saccadic eye movements.扫视眼动的短潜伏期以自我为中心控制
J Neurophysiol. 2017 Jan 1;117(1):376-387. doi: 10.1152/jn.00451.2016. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
10
Saccade target selection in visual search: the effect of information from the previous fixation.视觉搜索中的扫视目标选择:来自前一次注视信息的影响。
Vision Res. 2001 Jan;41(1):87-95. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(00)00236-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of Acute Physical Fatigue on Gaze Behavior and Performance During a Badminton Game.急性身体疲劳对羽毛球比赛中注视行为和表现的影响。
Front Sports Act Living. 2021 Oct 5;3:725625. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2021.725625. eCollection 2021.
2
GazeBase, a large-scale, multi-stimulus, longitudinal eye movement dataset.GazeBase,一个大规模、多刺激、纵向眼动数据集。
Sci Data. 2021 Jul 16;8(1):184. doi: 10.1038/s41597-021-00959-y.
3
Fixation duration and the learning process: an eye tracking study with subtitled videos.注视时长与学习过程:一项针对带字幕视频的眼动追踪研究
J Eye Mov Res. 2020 Aug 16;13(6). doi: 10.16910/jemr.13.6.1.
4
Mental fatigue measurement using eye metrics: A systematic literature review.使用眼动测量技术评估精神疲劳:系统文献回顾。
Psychophysiology. 2021 Jun;58(6):e13828. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13828. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
5
Eye movement characteristics reflected fatigue development in both young and elderly individuals.眼动特征反映了年轻和老年个体的疲劳发展。
Sci Rep. 2018 Sep 3;8(1):13148. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-31577-1.
6
A novel evaluation of two related and two independent algorithms for eye movement classification during reading.一种新的评估方法,用于阅读过程中眼动分类的两种相关算法和两种独立算法。
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Aug;50(4):1374-1397. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1050-7.
7
Eye movements discriminate fatigue due to chronotypical factors and time spent on task--a double dissociation.眼球运动可区分由生物钟因素和任务时长导致的疲劳——一种双重解离现象。
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 22;9(1):e87146. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087146. eCollection 2014.
8
The absence of eye muscle fatigue indicates that the nervous system compensates for non-motor disturbances of oculomotor function.眼外肌疲劳的缺失表明神经系统对眼球运动功能的非运动性障碍进行了代偿。
J Neurosci. 2010 Nov 24;30(47):15834-42. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3901-10.2010.
9
Blinks and saccades as indicators of fatigue in sleepiness warnings: looking tired?眨眼和眼球跳动作为困倦警告中疲劳的指标:看起来疲惫吗?
Ergonomics. 2008 Jul;51(7):982-1010. doi: 10.1080/00140130701817062.
10
Total sleep deprivation effect on disengagement of spatial attention as assessed by saccadic eye movements.通过眼跳运动评估完全睡眠剥夺对空间注意力脱离的影响。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 Apr;117(4):894-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.01.003. Epub 2006 Feb 23.