Suppr超能文献

猴子的扫视反应时间:眼动程序的提前准备是快速扫视发生的主要原因。

Saccadic reaction time in the monkey: advanced preparation of oculomotor programs is primarily responsible for express saccade occurrence.

作者信息

Paré M, Munoz D P

机构信息

Department of Physiology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Neurophysiol. 1996 Dec;76(6):3666-81. doi: 10.1152/jn.1996.76.6.3666.

Abstract
  1. The introduction of a period of darkness between the disappearance of an initial fixation target and the appearance of a peripheral saccade target produces a general reduction in saccadic reaction time (SRT)-known as the gap effect- and often very short latency express saccades. To account for these phenomena, premotor processes may be facilitated by release of visual fixation and advanced preparation of saccadic programs. The experiments described in this paper were designed to test the relevance of the ocular fixation disengagement and oculomotor preparation hypotheses by identifying the influence of different factors on SRTs and the occurrence of express saccades in the monkey. 2. The SRTs of two monkeys were measured in two behavioral paradigms. A peripheral saccade target appeared at the time of disappearance of a central fixation target in the no-gap task, whereas a 200-ms period of no stimuli was interposed between the fixation target disappearance and the saccade target appearance in the gap task. The distribution of SRTs in these tasks was generally bimodal; the first and second mode was composed of express and regular saccades, respectively. We measured the mean SRT, mean regular saccade latency, mean express saccade latency, and percentage of express saccades in both tasks. We also estimated the gap effect, i.e., the difference between the SRTs in no-gap trial and the SRTs in gap trials. 3. Once the animals were trained to make saccades to a single target location and produce express saccades, SRTs in both no-gap and gap trials displayed a broad tuning with respect to the spatial location of the trained target when the target location was varied randomly in a block of trials. Express saccades were made only to a restricted region of the visual field surrounding the trained target location. A gap effect was present for nearly all target locations tested, irrespective of express saccade occurrence. Finally, the probability of generating an express saccade at the trained target location decreased with the introduction of uncertainty about target location. 4. The occurrence of express saccades increased with the duration of the visual and nonvisual (gap) fixation that the animal was required to maintain before the onset of a saccade target. The gap duration was effective in reducing the mean SRT for gaps < or = 300 ms, and it was more influential than comparable variation in the visual fixation duration. 5. The occurrence of express saccades made to targets of identical eccentricity increased when the initial eye fixation position was shifted eccentric in a direction opposite to the saccade direction. Concomitantly, mean SRT decreased by approximately 2 ms for each 1-deg change in initial eye fixation position. 6. The occurrence of express saccades depended upon contextual factors, i.e., on both the behavioral task (no-gap or gap) and the latency of the saccade that the monkey executed to the same target in the preceding trial. The highest percentage of express saccades was observed after an express saccade in a no-gap trial, whereas the lowest percentage was obtained after a regular saccade in a gap trial. 7. These findings indicate that training-dependent express saccades are restricted to a specific spatial location dictated by the training target, and their incidence is facilitated by high predictability of target presentation, long-duration foreperiod, absence of visual fixation, eccentric initial eye position opposite to the saccade direction, and express saccade occurrence in the previous trial. The release of fixation afforded by the gap accounts for the general gap effect, but has only a modulatory influence on express saccade generation. We conclude that advanced motor preparation of saccadic programs generally reduces SRT and is primarily responsible for the occurrence of express saccades, which therefore may be caused mainly by neuronal changes restricted to a specific locus-coding for the trained movemen
摘要
  1. 在初始注视目标消失与周边扫视目标出现之间引入一段黑暗期,会使扫视反应时间(SRT)普遍缩短——即所谓的间隙效应——并且常常会出现潜伏期极短的快速扫视。为了解释这些现象,视觉注视的解除以及扫视程序的提前准备可能会促进运动前过程。本文所描述的实验旨在通过确定不同因素对猴子SRT以及快速扫视发生情况的影响,来检验眼动注视解除和眼动准备假说的相关性。2. 在两种行为范式中测量了两只猴子的SRT。在无间隙任务中,周边扫视目标在中央注视目标消失时出现,而在间隙任务中,在注视目标消失与扫视目标出现之间插入了200毫秒的无刺激期。这些任务中SRT的分布通常是双峰的;第一和第二模式分别由快速扫视和常规扫视组成。我们测量了两种任务中的平均SRT、平均常规扫视潜伏期、平均快速扫视潜伏期以及快速扫视的百分比。我们还估计了间隙效应,即无间隙试验中的SRT与间隙试验中的SRT之间的差异。3. 一旦训练动物向单个目标位置进行扫视并产生快速扫视,当在一组试验中随机改变目标位置时,无间隙和间隙试验中的SRT都会随着训练目标的空间位置呈现出广泛的调谐。快速扫视仅出现在围绕训练目标位置的视野受限区域。几乎所有测试的目标位置都存在间隙效应,无论快速扫视是否发生。最后,随着目标位置不确定性的引入,在训练目标位置产生快速扫视的概率降低。4. 快速扫视的发生率随着动物在扫视目标开始之前需要保持的视觉和非视觉(间隙)注视持续时间而增加。间隙持续时间在间隙小于或等于300毫秒时有效地降低了平均SRT,并且它比视觉注视持续时间的可比变化更具影响力。5. 当初始眼注视位置向与扫视方向相反的偏心方向移动时,对相同离心率目标的快速扫视发生率增加。同时,初始眼注视位置每改变1度,平均SRT大约降低2毫秒。6. 快速扫视的发生率取决于情境因素,即取决于行为任务(无间隙或间隙)以及猴子在前一次试验中对同一目标执行的扫视潜伏期。在无间隙试验中的快速扫视之后观察到快速扫视的最高百分比,而在间隙试验中的常规扫视之后获得最低百分比。7. 这些发现表明,依赖训练的快速扫视被限制在由训练目标决定的特定空间位置,并且它们的发生率会因目标呈现的高可预测性、长时前期、无视觉注视、与扫视方向相反的偏心初始眼位置以及前一次试验中快速扫视的发生而增加。间隙所提供的注视解除解释了一般的间隙效应,但对快速扫视的产生仅具有调节作用。我们得出结论,扫视程序的提前运动准备通常会降低SRT,并且主要负责快速扫视的发生,因此快速扫视可能主要是由局限于特定位点的神经元变化引起的——该位点编码训练动作

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验