Socioeconomic Inequalities in Frailty Distribution: A Cross-National Comparison of the United States and England.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study is to examine differences in socioeconomic gradients (i.e., education, income, and wealth) in frailty by gender in the United States and England.

METHODS

We used harmonized data from the Health and Retirement Study and the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing in 2016. Frailty status was determined from measured and self-reported signs and symptoms in 5 domains: unintentional weight loss, exhaustion, low physical activity, slow walking speed, and weakness. Respondents were classified as robust (no signs or symptoms of frailty), prefrail (signs or symptoms in 1-2 domains), or frail (signs or symptoms in 3 or more domains). Gender-stratified multinomial logistic regression models were used to assess the relationship between educational attainment, household income, and household wealth with the risk of frailty and prefrailty, with and without covariates. We also calculated the slope index of inequalities on the predicted probabilities of frailty by income and wealth quintiles.

RESULTS

We found socioeconomic gradients in prefrailty and frailty by education, income, and wealth. Furthermore, the educational gradient in frailty was significantly steeper for U.S. women compared to English women, and the income gradient was steeper for U.S. men and women compared to English men and women. The between-country differences were not accounted for by adjusting for race/ethnicity and behavioral factors.

DISCUSSION

Socioeconomic gradients in prefrailty and frailty differ by country setting and gender, suggesting contextual factors such as cultural norms, healthcare access and quality, and economic policy may contribute to the effect of different measures of socioeconomic status on prefrailty and frailty risk.