School of Architecture, Design and Planning, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Population Wellbeing and Environment Research Lab (PowerLab), Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Population Wellbeing and Environment Research Lab (PowerLab), Sydney, NSW, Australia; School of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Environ Res. 2024 Dec 15;263(Pt 1):120016. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.120016. Epub 2024 Sep 14.
Nature prescribing - a written recommendation by a health professional for a person to spend more time in nature for health reasons - is being heralded by some as a potential solution to loneliness, defined as a felt deprivation of meaningful connection, companionship, and camaraderie. However, such recommendations currently lack evidence on how much time in natural environments is needed to tackle loneliness and over what timescale.
General, emotional, and social loneliness were measured using De Jong Gierveld's 6-item scale in a nationally representative sample of 3043 Australian participants at baseline (October 2020), with 2421 and 2123 completing follow-ups at 4 months (February 2021) and 16 months (February 2022), respectively. Multilevel logistic regressions examined the odds of change in loneliness status between baseline and follow-up in relation to hours spent in nature in the 7 days prior to the baseline survey, adjusting for confounding factors that influence time spent in nature and the risk of feeling lonely.
Relief from general loneliness in those experiencing it at baseline was 22.4% at month 4 and 29.4% at month 16. The equivalent findings for relief from social loneliness and emotional loneliness were 21.2% and 24.6%, and 34.2% and 41.2% at months 4 and 16, respectively. Incidence of loneliness at 4 months was 21.8% (general), 26.1% (social), and 11.8% (emotional), and at 16 months was 22.7% (general), 25.6% (social), and 12% (emotional). At each time point, the prevalence of loneliness was lower among participants with more time in nature. Just 1-2 h per week in nature (versus <1) was associated with relief from social loneliness at 4 months (Odds Ratio [OR] 1.69, 95%CI 1.10, 2.65) and at 16 months (OR 2.10, 95%CI 1.34, 3.30). Higher odds of relief from emotional loneliness were observed at 3-4 h spent in nature at 4 months (OR 1.84, 95%CI 1.11, 3.06) and at 16 months (OR 1.82, 95%CI 1.09, 3.07). Incidence of loneliness was not associated with nature contact.
Increasing time in nature may an effective non-medical prescription for people who are lonely to find durable relief within a relatively short space of time. Findings from this longitudinal study can inform further investigation through randomised trials of co-designed nature prescriptions targeting relief from loneliness in vulnerable populations.
自然疗法——一种由健康专家开出的书面建议,建议人们为了健康而花更多的时间在大自然中——被一些人誉为解决孤独感的潜在方法,孤独感被定义为一种对有意义的联系、陪伴和友谊的缺失感。然而,目前此类建议缺乏关于需要在自然环境中花费多少时间才能解决孤独感以及需要多长时间才能产生效果的证据。
在一个具有全国代表性的 3043 名澳大利亚参与者的样本中,使用 Jong Gierveld 的 6 项量表测量一般、情感和社会孤独感,其中 2421 名和 2123 名参与者分别在 4 个月(2021 年 2 月)和 16 个月(2022 年 2 月)进行了随访。多水平逻辑回归分析了基线和随访之间孤独感状况变化与基线调查前 7 天内花在自然环境中的时间之间的关系,同时调整了影响花在自然环境中时间和感到孤独风险的混杂因素。
在基线时感到孤独的人中,在 4 个月时缓解的比例为 22.4%,在 16 个月时缓解的比例为 29.4%。社交孤独感和情感孤独感的相应缓解比例分别为 21.2%和 24.6%,以及 34.2%和 41.2%,在 4 个月和 16 个月时分别缓解。4 个月时的孤独感发生率为 21.8%(一般)、26.1%(社交)和 11.8%(情感),16 个月时的孤独感发生率为 22.7%(一般)、25.6%(社交)和 12%(情感)。在每个时间点,花在自然环境中的时间较多的参与者中,孤独感的发生率较低。每周仅 1-2 小时的自然接触(与每周<1 小时相比)与 4 个月时的社交孤独感缓解相关(优势比 [OR] 1.69,95%置信区间 [CI] 1.10-2.65)和 16 个月时的缓解相关(OR 2.10,95%CI 1.34-3.30)。在 4 个月时,每 3-4 小时的自然接触与情感孤独感的缓解相关(OR 1.84,95%CI 1.11-3.06)和 16 个月时缓解相关(OR 1.82,95%CI 1.09-3.07)。孤独感的发生率与自然接触无关。
增加在自然环境中的时间可能是一种有效的非药物处方,可让孤独的人在相对较短的时间内找到持久的缓解。这项纵向研究的结果可以通过针对弱势群体的孤独感缓解的联合设计自然处方的随机试验来进一步研究。