Suppr超能文献

接触自然、自然疗法和孤独:来自澳大利亚、印度、新加坡、英国和美国成年人国际调查的证据。

Contact with nature, nature prescriptions, and loneliness: Evidence from an international survey of adults in Australia, India, Singapore, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

机构信息

School of Architecture, Design, and Planning, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Population Wellbeing and Environment Research Lab (PowerLab), Sydney, Australia.

US Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Philadelphia, United States.

出版信息

Health Place. 2024 Nov;90:103331. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2024.103331. Epub 2024 Oct 7.

Abstract

Evidence to support nature contact and nature prescriptions to reduce loneliness is scant. A total of 2100 individuals took part in a survey conducted in Australia (n = 525, mean age = 34.1), India (n = 526, mean age = 29.5), Singapore (n = 523, mean age = 36.1), the UK (n = 526, mean age = 37.3), and the US (n = 525, mean age = 43.6) in 2022 (overall age range 18-89yrs). Multilevel logistic regressions adjusted for confounding indicated mean levels of overall loneliness tended to be higher in India (Odds Ratio [OR] 1.21, 95% Confidence Interval [95%CI] 0.90-1.62), Singapore (OR = 1.54, 95%CI = 1.15-2.07), the UK (OR = 1.26, 95%CI = 0.96-1.67) and the US (OR = 1.24, 95%CI = 0.94-1.64) compared with Australia. Notable differences were observed by loneliness type, for example, with lower odds of social loneliness (OR = 0.57, 95%CI = 0.41-0.79) and higher odds of emotional loneliness (OR = 1.57, 95%CI = 1.14-2.06) in India compared with Australia. Findings with regards to loneliness and nature contact varied between country. In general, social loneliness was lower in participants who visited natural surroundings regularly (OR = 0.81, 95%CI = 0.61-0.98) and spent two hours or more per week in nature (OR = 0.65, 95%CI = 0.49-0.81). Overall loneliness (OR = 1.98, 95%CI = 1.48-2.47) and emotional loneliness (OR = 2.84, 95%CI = 2.13-3.51) were substantially higher among those who felt having no-one to go with was a barrier to spending time in nature. Emotional loneliness was higher in those who had more time in nature (OR = 1.32, 95%CI = 0.94-1.75) or more frequent visits (OR = 1.24, 95%CI = 0.94-1.49), which may be indicative of selective processes by which some people who feel emotionally lonely seek meaningful sources of connection or solace in natural environments. In sum, these findings highlight potentially important contingencies in how people feel lonely in different countries, and the potential of contact with nature as a means to address this critical issue of modern times. Randomised trials of nature prescription interventions for loneliness co-designed with respect to contrasting cultural, economic, and climatic contexts are needed to ensure programs intended to reconnect people with nature are effective, equitable, and acceptable for everyone.

摘要

支持接触自然和开自然处方以减少孤独感的证据很少。2022 年,澳大利亚(n=525,平均年龄=34.1)、印度(n=526,平均年龄=29.5)、新加坡(n=523,平均年龄=36.1)、英国(n=526,平均年龄=37.3)和美国(n=525,平均年龄=43.6)共有 2100 人参加了一项调查。(总体年龄范围为 18-89 岁)。多水平逻辑回归调整混杂因素后表明,整体孤独感水平在印度(优势比 [OR] 1.21,95%置信区间 [95%CI] 0.90-1.62)、新加坡(OR=1.54,95%CI=1.15-2.07)、英国(OR=1.26,95%CI=0.96-1.67)和美国(OR=1.24,95%CI=0.94-1.64)中往往更高。根据孤独类型观察到了显著差异,例如,与澳大利亚相比,印度的社交孤独感(OR=0.57,95%CI=0.41-0.79)和情绪孤独感(OR=1.57,95%CI=1.14-2.06)的可能性较低。关于孤独感和与自然接触的发现因国家而异。一般来说,经常参观自然环境的参与者(OR=0.81,95%CI=0.61-0.98)和每周在自然环境中花费两小时或更长时间(OR=0.65,95%CI=0.49-0.81)的社交孤独感较低。整体孤独感(OR=1.98,95%CI=1.48-2.47)和情绪孤独感(OR=2.84,95%CI=2.13-3.51)在那些觉得无人陪伴是阻碍他们花时间在自然环境中的人中要高得多。情绪孤独感在那些在自然环境中花费更多时间(OR=1.32,95%CI=0.94-1.75)或更频繁访问(OR=1.24,95%CI=0.94-1.49)的人中更高,这可能表明,一些感到情绪孤独的人通过有选择性的过程,在自然环境中寻求有意义的联系或慰藉。总之,这些发现强调了不同国家人们感到孤独的潜在重要因素,以及接触自然作为解决现代这一关键问题的一种手段的潜在可能性。需要针对具有文化、经济和气候差异的自然处方干预措施进行随机试验,以确保旨在重新将人们与自然联系起来的计划对每个人都是有效、公平和可接受的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验