Gross Sophia, Ihlow Jana, Busack Leonie, Adamiak Kacper, Schrezenmeier Jens, Jesse Julia, Schwarz Michaela, Flörcken Anne, Vuong Lam Giang, Rieger Kathrin, Krönke Jan, le Coutre Philipp, Boldt Vivien, von Brünneck Ann-Christin, Horst David, Burmeister Thomas, Blau Igor-Wolfgang, Keller Ulrich, Bullinger Lars, Westermann Jörg
Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Campus Virchow Clinic, Campus Charité-Mitte and Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Institute of Pathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Blood Cancer J. 2024 Sep 16;14(1):160. doi: 10.1038/s41408-024-01140-5.
Therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (t-AML) often exhibits adverse (genetic) features. There is ongoing discussion on the impact of t-AML on long-term outcome in AML. Therefore, we retrospectively analyzed clinical and biological characteristics of 1133 AML patients (225 t-AML patients and 908 de novo AML patients) with a median follow-up of 81.8 months. T-AML patients showed more adverse genetic alterations, higher age and more comorbidities as compared to de novo AML. Median OS in intensively treated t-AML patients was 13.7 months as compared to 39.4 months in de novo AML (p < 0.001). With non-intensive therapy, OS did not differ significantly (p = 0.394). With intensive therapy, significant differences in favor of de novo AML were observed in the ELN intermediate I/II (p = 0.009) and adverse (p = 0.016) risk groups but not within favorable risk groups (APL p = 0.927, ELN favorable p = 0.714). However, t-AML was no independent risk factor for OS (p = 0.103), RR (p = 0.982) and NRM (p = 0.320) in the multivariate analysis. A limitation of our study is an ELN 2010 risk stratification due to a lack of more comprehensive molecular data according to ELN 2022. We conclude that therapeutic algorithms in t-AML, in particular with regard to allo-HSCT, should be guided by ELN genetic risk rather than classification as t-AML alone. Our data support the WHO and ICC 2022 classifications, which include t-AML as diagnostic qualifier rather than a separate subcategory.
治疗相关的急性髓系白血病(t-AML)常表现出不良(遗传)特征。关于t-AML对AML长期预后的影响,目前仍在讨论中。因此,我们回顾性分析了1133例AML患者(225例t-AML患者和908例初发AML患者)的临床和生物学特征,中位随访时间为81.8个月。与初发AML相比,t-AML患者表现出更多不良基因改变、更高的年龄和更多的合并症。接受强化治疗的t-AML患者的中位总生存期为13.7个月,而初发AML患者为39.4个月(p < 0.001)。采用非强化治疗时,总生存期无显著差异(p = 0.394)。采用强化治疗时,在欧洲白血病网(ELN)中危I/II(p = 0.009)和高危(p = 0.016)风险组中观察到有利于初发AML的显著差异,但在低危风险组中未观察到(急性早幼粒细胞白血病p = 0.927,ELN低危p = 0.714)。然而,在多变量分析中,t-AML并非总生存期(p = 0.103)、复发风险(p = 0.982)和非复发死亡率(p = 0.320)的独立危险因素。我们研究的一个局限性是由于缺乏符合ELN 2022标准的更全面分子数据,采用的是ELN 2010风险分层。我们得出结论,t-AML的治疗算法,特别是关于异基因造血干细胞移植,应以ELN遗传风险为指导,而不是仅根据t-AML分类。我们的数据支持世界卫生组织(WHO)和国际癌症研究机构(ICC)2022年的分类,其中将t-AML作为诊断限定词而非单独的亚类。