Koenig Felix R M, Raudner Marcus, Juras Vladimir, Szomolanyi Pavol, Vetchy Veronika, Kittinger Jakob, Zadeh Ehsan Safai, Watzenböck Martin L, Trattnig Siegfried
Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, High-Field MR Centre, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Eur Radiol. 2025 Apr;35(4):1808-1817. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-11078-8. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
Bone marrow edema-like signal (BMELS) after cartilage repair is common, but its clinical significance remains uncertain. This study aimed to investigate the clinical and structural significance of BMELS following microfracturing (MFX) and matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI).
In this multicenter study, MRI examinations were performed over a period of 5 years after cartilage repair surgery (MFX n = 17; MACI n = 28) in 45 patients. Morphological assessments, including the MOCART 2.0 (magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue), quantitative imaging biomarkers (QIB) with T2 mapping of the repair tissue, and, specifically, assessment of the presence and size of BMELS, were conducted along with patient-reported outcome measures, such as the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC). BMELS structural and clinical assessments were obtained after 3 months, 12 months, and 60 months. Statistical analysis included the Mann-Whitney U-test, Wilcoxon rank test, Shapiro-Wilk test, and simulation-based power analysis.
BMELS were a common finding 60 months after cartilage repair. The size of BMELS differed significantly only between MACI and MFX patients after 3 months, with larger BMELS occurring in the MFX group. There were no significant differences in patients with or without BMELS regarding the T2 ratio of the treated area, the MOCART 2.0, or clinical scores.
BMELS frequently appeared after cartilage repair procedures. We could show that the postoperative size and change in the size of BMELS after MACI and MFX did not affect clinical scores, morphological MRI results, or biochemical properties of the treated area after 60 months.
Question What is the clinical significance of bone marrow edema-like signal (BMELS) appearance after matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI) or microfracture (MFX)? Finding There were no significant differences in patients with or without BMELS regarding the T2 ratio of the treated area, the MOCART 2.0, or clinical scores. Clinical relevance BMELS frequently appeared after cartilage repair, the appearance or the size dynamic after MACI and MFX did not affect clinical scores, morphological MRI results, or biochemical properties after 60 months.
软骨修复后骨髓水肿样信号(BMELS)较为常见,但其临床意义仍不明确。本研究旨在探讨微骨折术(MFX)和基质诱导自体软骨细胞植入术(MACI)后BMELS的临床及结构意义。
在这项多中心研究中,对45例接受软骨修复手术(MFX组17例;MACI组28例)的患者在术后5年期间进行了MRI检查。进行了形态学评估,包括MOCART 2.0(软骨修复组织的磁共振观察)、对修复组织进行T2映射的定量成像生物标志物(QIB),特别是对BMELS的存在和大小进行评估,并同时采用患者报告的结局指标,如膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结局评分(KOOS)以及国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)评分。在术后3个月、12个月和60个月时获得BMELS的结构和临床评估结果。统计分析包括曼-惠特尼U检验、威尔科克森秩和检验、夏皮罗-威尔克检验以及基于模拟的效能分析。
BMELS是软骨修复60个月后的常见表现。仅在术后3个月时,MACI组和MFX组患者的BMELS大小存在显著差异,MFX组的BMELS更大。有或无BMELS的患者在治疗区域的T2比值、MOCART 2.0评分或临床评分方面均无显著差异。
BMELS在软骨修复手术后经常出现。我们发现,MACI和MFX术后BMELS的大小及大小变化在60个月后并未影响临床评分、MRI形态学结果或治疗区域的生化特性。
问题:基质诱导自体软骨细胞植入术(MACI)或微骨折术(MFX)后出现的骨髓水肿样信号(BMELS)的临床意义是什么?发现:有或无BMELS的患者在治疗区域的T2比值、MOCART 2.0评分或临床评分方面均无显著差异。临床意义:BMELS在软骨修复后经常出现,MACI和MFX后其出现或大小动态变化在60个月后并未影响临床评分、MRI形态学结果或生化特性。