Suppr超能文献

糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者强化降压与无卒中生存之间的关联

Association between intensive blood pressure lowering and stroke-free survival among patients with and without Diabetes.

作者信息

Zhang Zhuo, Nie Zhiqiang, Chen Kangyu, Shi Rui, Wu Zhenqiang, Li Chao, Zhang Songjie, Chen Tao

机构信息

School of Health Services Management, Xi'an Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.

Hypertension Research Laboratory, Global Health Research Center, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 16;14(1):21551. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-72211-7.

Abstract

This study pooled data from SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) and ACCORD-BP (Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Blood Pressure) trial to estimate the treatment effect of intensive BP on stroke prevention, and investigate whether stroke risk score impacted treatment effect. Of all the potential manifestations of the hypertension, the most severe outcomes were stroke or death. A composite endpoint of time to death or stroke (stroke-free survival [SFS]), whichever occurred first, was defined as the outcome of interest. Participants without prevalent stroke were stratified into stroke risk tertiles based on the predicted revised Framingham Stroke Risk Score. The stratified Cox model was used to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) for the intensive BP treatment. 834 (5.92%) patients had SFS events over a median follow-up of 3.68 years. A reduction in the risk for SFS was observed among the intensive BP group as compared with the standard BP group (HR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.65, 0.89; risk difference: 0.98([0.20, 1.76]). Further analyses demonstrated the significant benefit of intensive BP treatment on SFS only among participants having a high stroke risk (risk tertile 1: 0.76 [0.52, 1.11], number needed to treat [NNT] = 861; risk tertile 2: 0.87[0.65, 1.16], NNT = 91; risk tertile 3: 0.69[0.56, 0.86], NNT = 50). Intensive BP treatment lowered the risk of SFS, particularly for those at high risk of stroke.

摘要

本研究汇总了收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)和糖尿病血压控制心血管风险行动试验(ACCORD - BP)的数据,以评估强化血压治疗对预防中风的效果,并调查中风风险评分是否会影响治疗效果。在高血压的所有潜在表现中,最严重的后果是中风或死亡。将死亡或中风发生时间(无中风生存期[SFS])的复合终点(以先发生者为准)定义为感兴趣的结局。没有中风病史的参与者根据预测的修订版弗明汉姆中风风险评分被分层为中风风险三分位数组。采用分层Cox模型计算强化血压治疗的风险比(HR)。在3.68年的中位随访期内,有834名(5.92%)患者发生了SFS事件。与标准血压组相比,强化血压组的SFS风险有所降低(HR:0.76,95%置信区间:0.65,0.89;风险差异:0.98[0.20,1.76])。进一步分析表明,强化血压治疗仅对中风风险高的参与者的SFS有显著益处(风险三分位数1:0.76[0.52,1.11],需治疗人数[NNT] = 861;风险三分位数2:0.87[0.65,1.16],NNT = 91;风险三分位数3:0.69[0.56,0.86],NNT = 50)。强化血压治疗降低了SFS风险,尤其是对中风高危人群。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb97/11405663/4c2f8acb012f/41598_2024_72211_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验