强化与标准血压控制对脑卒中亚型的影响。
Effect of Intensive Versus Standard Blood Pressure Control on Stroke Subtypes.
机构信息
From the Division of Clinical Research, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (C.B.W.).
Department of Neurology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson (A.P.A.).
出版信息
Hypertension. 2021 Apr;77(4):1391-1398. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.16027. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
Abstract
[Figure: see text].
摘要
[图：见正文]。
相似文献
1
Effect of Intensive Versus Standard Blood Pressure Control on Stroke Subtypes.强化与标准血压控制对脑卒中亚型的影响。
Hypertension. 2021 Apr;77(4):1391-1398. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.16027. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
2
Intensive Blood Pressure Control and Diabetes Mellitus-Related Limb Events in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Reanalysis of ACCORD.强化血压控制与2型糖尿病患者糖尿病相关肢体事件：ACCORD研究的重新分析
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Aug 3;10(15):e021407. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.021407. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
3
Antihypertensive Drugs for Secondary Prevention After Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.降压药物在缺血性卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作后的二级预防中的应用：系统评价和荟萃分析。
Stroke. 2021 Jun;52(6):1974-1982. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.031945. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
4
Baseline Serum Bilirubin and Risk of First Stroke in Hypertensive Patients.高血压患者基线血清胆红素与首次卒中风险的关系。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Jun 16;9(12):e015799. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.015799. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
5
Impact of Therapeutic Inertia on Long-Term Blood Pressure Control: A Monte Carlo Simulation Study.治疗惰性对长期血压控制的影响：一项蒙特卡罗模拟研究。
Hypertension. 2021 Apr;77(4):1350-1359. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.15866. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
6
Visit-to-Visit Systolic Blood Pressure Variability and Risk of Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Stroke.就诊间收缩压变异性与缺血性和出血性卒中风险
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Feb 4;61(2):267. doi: 10.3390/medicina61020267.
7
Empowerment and mobile technology in the detection and treatment of main cardiovascular risk factors of patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack: a protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial (CARDIOSTROKE).缺血性中风或短暂性脑缺血发作患者主要心血管危险因素检测与治疗中的赋权与移动技术：一项多中心随机对照试验（CARDIOSTROKE）方案
Trials. 2025 Mar 14;26(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-08778-x.
8
A U-shaped association between serum betaine and incident risk of first ischemic stroke in hypertensive patients.血清甜菜碱与高血压患者首发缺血性脑卒中事件风险之间呈 U 型关联。
Clin Nutr. 2020 Aug;39(8):2517-2524. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2019.11.011. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
9
Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) and Target Systolic Blood Pressure in Future Hypertension Guidelines.收缩压干预试验（SPRINT）与未来高血压指南中的目标收缩压
Hypertension. 2016 Aug;68(2):318-23. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.116.07575. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
10
2020 International Society of Hypertension Global Hypertension Practice Guidelines.2020年国际高血压学会全球高血压实践指南
Hypertension. 2020 Jun;75(6):1334-1357. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.15026. Epub 2020 May 6.
引用本文的文献
1
Association between intensive blood pressure lowering and stroke-free survival among patients with and without Diabetes.糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者强化降压与无卒中生存之间的关联
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 16;14(1):21551. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-72211-7.
2
Optimal target blood pressure for the primary prevention of hemorrhagic stroke: a nationwide observational study.原发性预防出血性卒中的最佳目标血压：一项全国性观察性研究。
Front Neurol. 2023 Oct 9;14:1268542. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1268542. eCollection 2023.
本文引用的文献
1
Association of Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control With Cerebral White Matter Lesions.强化与标准血压控制与脑白质病变的关联。
JAMA. 2019 Aug 13;322(6):524-534. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.10551.
2
Visit-to-Visit Blood Pressure Variability, Coronary Atheroma Progression, and Clinical Outcomes.血压变异性与冠状动脉粥样硬化进展及临床转归的关系
JAMA Cardiol. 2019 May 1;4(5):437-443. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.0751.
3
Effect of Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control on Probable Dementia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.强化与标准血压控制对可能发生的痴呆的影响：一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2019 Feb 12;321(6):553-561. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.21442.
4
Effects of Intensive Systolic Blood Pressure Lowering on Cardiovascular Events and Mortality in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus on Standard Glycemic Control and in Those Without Diabetes Mellitus: Reconciling Results From ACCORD BP and SPRINT.强化收缩压降压治疗对标准血糖控制的 2 型糖尿病患者及无糖尿病患者心血管事件和死亡率的影响：来自 ACCORD BP 和 SPRINT 的结果再分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Sep 18;7(18):e009326. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009326.
5
Assessment of the Predictive Validity of Etiologic Stroke Classification.病因性卒中分类的预测效度评估。
JAMA Neurol. 2017 Apr 1;74(4):419-426. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.5815.
6
Loci associated with ischaemic stroke and its subtypes (SiGN): a genome-wide association study.与缺血性中风及其亚型相关的基因座（SiGN）：一项全基因组关联研究。
Lancet Neurol. 2016 Feb;15(2):174-184. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00338-5. Epub 2015 Dec 19.
7
A Randomized Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control.强化与标准血压控制的随机试验
N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 26;373(22):2103-16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1511939. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
8
Pathogenic ischemic stroke phenotypes in the NINDS-stroke genetics network.美国国立神经疾病与中风研究所中风遗传学网络中的致病性缺血性中风表型
Stroke. 2014 Dec;45(12):3589-96. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.007362. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
9
Guidelines for the primary prevention of stroke: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.《卒中一级预防指南：美国心脏协会/美国卒中协会给医疗保健专业人员的声明》
Stroke. 2014 Dec;45(12):3754-832. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000046. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
10
The design and rationale of a multicenter clinical trial comparing two strategies for control of systolic blood pressure: the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT).一项比较两种收缩压控制策略的多中心临床试验的设计与原理：收缩压干预试验（SPRINT）
Clin Trials. 2014 Oct;11(5):532-46. doi: 10.1177/1740774514537404. Epub 2014 Jun 5.
Zotero 插件