• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用 MRI 得出的大病灶比率评估股骨头坏死塌陷的风险:一项回顾性队列研究。

Risk assessment for femoral head collapse in osteonecrosis utilizing MRI-derived large lesion ratio: a retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

Zhongshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhongshan, Guangdong, China.

Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Sep 16;25(1):740. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07787-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12891-024-07787-2
PMID:39285271
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11403879/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed to developed a novel and practical method to quantify the involvement of lesion in osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). We hypothesized that the new metric large lesion ratio (LLR) had promising prognostic value.

METHODS

A total of 131 hips with non-traumatic ONFH were included in this retrospective study. Patient aged 18-60 with MRI-confirmed diagnosis, and a minimum of 2-year follow-up or radiographic collapse progression during follow-up were included. Patients with prior hip surgery, incomplete data or advanced ONFH at baseline (femoral head collapse > 2 mm or osteoarthritis) were excluded. Involvement of necrotic lesion was evaluated by calculating LLR. The differences of LLR between collapse progression and non-progression groups were investigated, and the differences among different scanning parameters groups were also examined. Prognostic value of LLR was examined by multivariate regression analysis. Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) were constructed and areas under the curve (AUC) were compared.

RESULTS

The median of LLR was 66.67% in the collapse progression group, which was significantly higher compared with 25.00% in the non-progression group (P < 0.001). Subgroups analysis showed that LLR were significantly higher in the collapse progression group of Japanese Investigation Committee type C1 (P < 0.001)and C2 (P = 0.002). Multivariate regression showed that LLR were independently correlated with collapse progression (OR, 1.46 [95% CI, 1.24-1.78]; P < 0.001). ROC analysis showed that the AUC for LLR was 0.84, outperforming the 0.74 AUC OF the JIC classification.

CONCLUSION

LLR could served as a efficient tool to assess the risk of collapse progression and guide the selection of treatment strategy.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在开发一种新颖实用的方法来量化股骨头坏死(ONFH)病变的受累程度。我们假设新的指标大病变比(LLR)具有有前途的预后价值。

方法

本回顾性研究共纳入 131 髋非创伤性 ONFH 患者。纳入标准为:年龄 18-60 岁,MRI 确诊,随访至少 2 年或随访过程中出现影像学塌陷进展;排除标准为:既往髋关节手术史、资料不完整或基线时存在晚期 ONFH(股骨头塌陷>2mm 或骨关节炎)。通过计算 LLR 评估坏死病变的受累情况。研究比较了塌陷进展组与非进展组之间的 LLR 差异,同时还比较了不同扫描参数组之间的差异。采用多变量回归分析探讨了 LLR 的预后价值。构建了受试者工作特征曲线(ROC),并比较了曲线下面积(AUC)。

结果

塌陷进展组的 LLR 中位数为 66.67%,明显高于非进展组的 25.00%(P<0.001)。亚组分析显示,日本研究委员会(JIC)分型 C1 (P<0.001)和 C2 (P=0.002)组的塌陷进展组 LLR 明显更高。多变量回归分析显示,LLR 与塌陷进展独立相关(OR,1.46[95%CI,1.24-1.78];P<0.001)。ROC 分析显示,LLR 的 AUC 为 0.84,优于 JIC 分类的 0.74 AUC。

结论

LLR 可作为评估塌陷进展风险和指导治疗策略选择的有效工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fed/11403879/48690b2d394e/12891_2024_7787_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fed/11403879/13edc741d71e/12891_2024_7787_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fed/11403879/1c7fc9dd255f/12891_2024_7787_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fed/11403879/48690b2d394e/12891_2024_7787_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fed/11403879/13edc741d71e/12891_2024_7787_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fed/11403879/1c7fc9dd255f/12891_2024_7787_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fed/11403879/48690b2d394e/12891_2024_7787_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk assessment for femoral head collapse in osteonecrosis utilizing MRI-derived large lesion ratio: a retrospective cohort study.利用 MRI 得出的大病灶比率评估股骨头坏死塌陷的风险:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Sep 16;25(1):740. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07787-2.
2
[A novel lateral classification of osteonecrosis of femoral head based on CT recons-truction of necrotic area and its clinical verification].[基于股骨头坏死区CT重建的一种新型股骨头坏死外侧分型及其临床验证]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Apr 15;37(4):423-430. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202212082.
3
Which Classification System Is Most Useful for Classifying Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head?哪种分类系统最有助于分类股骨头坏死?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Jun;476(6):1240-1249. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000245.
4
Evaluation of the predictive values of collapse and necrotic lesion boundary for osteonecrosis of the femoral head prognosis.塌陷和坏死病灶边界对股骨头坏死预后的预测价值评估。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Mar 13;14:1137786. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1137786. eCollection 2023.
5
Prognostic analysis of different morphology of the necrotic-viable interface in osteonecrosis of the femoral head.股骨头坏死中坏死-存活界面不同形态的预后分析
Int Orthop. 2018 Jan;42(1):133-139. doi: 10.1007/s00264-017-3679-8. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
6
High Pelvic Incidence Is Associated with Disease Progression in Nontraumatic Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head.高位骨盆倾斜与非创伤性股骨头坏死的疾病进展相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Aug;478(8):1870-1876. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001155.
7
[Predictive effect of femoral neck strength composite indexes on femoral head collapse in non-traumatic osteonecrosis of femoral head].[股骨颈强度复合指标对非创伤性股骨头坏死股骨头塌陷的预测作用]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Aug 15;35(8):967-972. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202103168.
8
Factors related to collapse progression in Japanese Investigation Committee classification type B osteonecrosis of the femoral head.日本调查委员会分类中股骨头B型骨坏死塌陷进展的相关因素
Int Orthop. 2024 Aug;48(8):2033-2040. doi: 10.1007/s00264-024-06221-5. Epub 2024 May 28.
9
Diagnostic value of necrotic lesion boundary in bone collapse of femoral head osteonecrosis.股骨头坏死塌陷中骨坏死病变边界对诊断的价值。
Int Orthop. 2022 Mar;46(3):423-431. doi: 10.1007/s00264-021-05081-7. Epub 2021 May 27.
10
Sclerosis rim volume ratio and Japanese Investigation Committee classification as predictive factors for femoral head collapse progression after non-vascularized fibular grafting in osteonecrosis patients.硬化边缘体积比和日本调查委员会分类作为非血管化腓骨移植术后股骨头坏死患者股骨头塌陷进展的预测因素。
Asian J Surg. 2024 Jan;47(1):250-255. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2023.08.107. Epub 2023 Sep 2.

本文引用的文献

1
The Value of the Frog Lateral View Radiograph for Detecting Collapse of Femur Head Necrosis: A Retrospective Study of 1001 Cases.蛙式位X线片对检测股骨头坏死塌陷的价值:1001例回顾性研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Mar 29;9:811644. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.811644. eCollection 2022.
2
Predicting Collapse in Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head Using a New Method: Preserved Angles of Anterior and Lateral Femoral Head.使用新方法预测股骨头坏死的塌陷:保留股骨头前侧和外侧角。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2022 Apr 6;104(Suppl 2):47-53. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.00507.
3
The 2021 Association Research Circulation Osseous Classification for Early-Stage Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head to Computed Tomography-Based Study.
2021 年髋关节骨坏死的协会研究循环骨质分类与基于计算机断层扫描的研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Jun;37(6):1074-1082. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.02.009. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
4
Diagnostic value of necrotic lesion boundary in bone collapse of femoral head osteonecrosis.股骨头坏死塌陷中骨坏死病变边界对诊断的价值。
Int Orthop. 2022 Mar;46(3):423-431. doi: 10.1007/s00264-021-05081-7. Epub 2021 May 27.
5
Japanese Orthopaedic Association 2019 Guidelines for osteonecrosis of the femoral head.日本矫形外科学会 2019 年股骨头坏死治疗指南。
J Orthop Sci. 2021 Jan;26(1):46-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2020.06.013. Epub 2020 Dec 30.
6
Nontraumatic Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head: Where Do We Stand Today?: A 5-Year Update.非创伤性股骨头坏死:今天我们站在哪里?:5 年更新。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 Jun 17;102(12):1084-1099. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.19.01271.
7
The 2019 Revised Version of Association Research Circulation Osseous Staging System of Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head.2019 年版股骨头坏死的协会研究循环性骨坏死分期系统。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Apr;35(4):933-940. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.11.029. Epub 2019 Nov 27.
8
Classification of osteonecrosis of the femoral head: Who should have surgery?股骨头坏死的分类:谁应该接受手术?
Bone Joint Res. 2019 Nov 2;8(10):451-458. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.810.BJR-2019-0022.R1. eCollection 2019 Oct.
9
Osteonecrosis of the femoral head: pathophysiology and current concepts of treatment.股骨头坏死:病理生理学与当前治疗理念
EFORT Open Rev. 2019 Mar 15;4(3):85-97. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180036. eCollection 2019 Mar.
10
Classification systems of hip osteonecrosis: an updated review.髋关节骨坏死的分类系统:最新综述。
Int Orthop. 2019 May;43(5):1089-1095. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4018-4. Epub 2018 Jun 18.