Department of Stomatology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 253 Gongyedadao Road, Guangzhou, 510282, China.
School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Sep 16;24(1):1095. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04847-w.
This clinical study aimed to evaluate the practical value of integrating an AI diagnostic model into clinical practice for caries detection using intraoral images.
In this prospective study, 4,361 teeth from 191 consecutive patients visiting an endodontics clinic were examined using an intraoral camera. The AI model, combining MobileNet-v3 and U-net architectures, was used for caries detection. The diagnostic performance of the AI model was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy, with the clinical diagnosis by endodontic specialists as the reference standard.
The overall accuracy of the AI-assisted caries detection was 93.40%. The sensitivity and specificity were 81.31% (95% CI 78.22%-84.06%) and 95.65% (95% CI 94.94%-96.26%), respectively. The NPV and PPV were 96.49% (95% CI 95.84%-97.04%) and 77.68% (95% CI 74.49%-80.58%), respectively. The diagnostic accuracy varied depending on tooth position and caries type, with the highest accuracy in anterior teeth (96.04%) and the lowest sensitivity for interproximal caries in anterior teeth and buccal caries in premolars (approximately 10%).
The AI-assisted caries detection tool demonstrated potential for clinical application, with high overall accuracy and specificity. However, the sensitivity varied considerably depending on tooth position and caries type, suggesting the need for further improvement. Integration of multimodal data and development of more advanced AI models may enhance the performance of AI-assisted caries detection in clinical practice.
本临床研究旨在评估将 AI 诊断模型整合到临床实践中,以通过口腔内图像检测龋齿的实用价值。
在这项前瞻性研究中,使用口腔内相机对 191 名连续就诊的患者的 4361 颗牙齿进行了检查。AI 模型结合了 MobileNet-v3 和 U-net 架构,用于龋齿检测。使用敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)和准确性评估 AI 模型的诊断性能,以牙髓病专家的临床诊断为参考标准。
AI 辅助龋齿检测的总体准确率为 93.40%。敏感性和特异性分别为 81.31%(95%CI78.22%-84.06%)和 95.65%(95%CI94.94%-96.26%)。NPV 和 PPV 分别为 96.49%(95%CI95.84%-97.04%)和 77.68%(95%CI94.49%-90.58%)。诊断准确性取决于牙齿位置和龋齿类型,前牙的准确率最高(96.04%),前牙邻面龋齿和前磨牙颊面龋齿的敏感性最低(约 10%)。
AI 辅助龋齿检测工具具有临床应用的潜力,具有较高的总体准确性和特异性。然而,敏感性因牙齿位置和龋齿类型而异,表明需要进一步改进。整合多模态数据和开发更先进的 AI 模型可能会提高 AI 辅助龋齿检测在临床实践中的性能。