Suppr超能文献

DNA 条码、标准条码和形态学方法在昆虫生物多样性鉴定中的性能比较。

Performance of DNA metabarcoding, standard barcoding and morphological approaches in the identification of insect biodiversity.

机构信息

Department of Biology and Environmental Sciences, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden.

出版信息

Mol Ecol Resour. 2024 Nov;24(8):e14018. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.14018. Epub 2024 Sep 16.

Abstract

For two decades, DNA barcoding and, more recently, DNA metabarcoding have been used for molecular species identification and estimating biodiversity. Despite their growing use, few studies have systematically evaluated these methods. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of barcoding methods in identifying species and estimating biodiversity, by assessing their consistency with traditional morphological identification and evaluating how assignment consistency is influenced by taxonomic group, sequence similarity thresholds and geographic distance. We first analysed 951 insect specimens across three taxonomic groups: butterflies, bumblebees and parasitic wasps, using both morphological taxonomy and single-specimen COI DNA barcoding. An additional 25,047 butterfly specimens were identified by COI DNA metabarcoding. Finally, we performed a systematic review of 99 studies to assess average consistency between insect species identity assigned via morphology and COI barcoding and to examine the distribution of research effort. Species assignment consistency was influenced by taxonomic group, sequence similarity thresholds and geographic distance. An average assignment consistency of 49% was found across taxonomic groups, with parasitic wasps displaying lower consistency due to taxonomic impediment. The number of missing matches doubled with a 100% sequence similarity threshold and COI intraspecific variation increased with geographic distance. Metabarcoding results aligned well with morphological biodiversity estimates and a strong positive correlation between sequence reads and species abundance was found. The systematic review revealed an 89% average consistency and also indicated taxonomic and geographic biases in research effort. Together, our findings demonstrate that while problems persist, barcoding approaches offer robust alternatives to traditional taxonomy for biodiversity assessment.

摘要

二十年来,DNA 条码技术(DNA barcoding)和最近的 DNA 元条码技术(DNA metabarcoding)已被用于分子物种鉴定和生物多样性估计。尽管这些技术的应用越来越广泛,但很少有研究系统地评估这些方法。本研究旨在通过评估条码方法与传统形态学鉴定的一致性,并评估分类群、序列相似性阈值和地理距离如何影响分配一致性,来评估条码方法在物种鉴定和生物多样性估计方面的功效。我们首先分析了三个分类群(蝴蝶、熊蜂和寄生蜂)的 951 个昆虫标本,同时使用形态分类学和单个标本 COI DNA 条码技术。还通过 COI DNA 元条码技术鉴定了另外 25047 个蝴蝶标本。最后,我们对 99 项研究进行了系统综述,以评估通过形态学和 COI 条码鉴定的昆虫物种身份的平均一致性,并检查研究工作的分布情况。物种分配一致性受到分类群、序列相似性阈值和地理距离的影响。在分类群之间发现平均分配一致性为 49%,寄生蜂由于分类障碍而显示出较低的一致性。当序列相似性阈值为 100%时,缺失匹配的数量增加了一倍,而 COI 种内变异随着地理距离的增加而增加。元条码技术的结果与形态生物多样性估计值吻合良好,并且发现序列读数与物种丰度之间存在强烈的正相关关系。系统综述显示平均一致性为 89%,并表明研究工作存在分类和地理偏见。总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,尽管存在问题,但条码方法为生物多样性评估提供了替代传统分类学的可靠方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验