a Department of Eukaryotic Microbiology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Universitätsstrasse 5 S05 R04 H83 D-45141 Essen, Germany.
b Swedish Museum of Natural History, Department of Zoology, Box 50007, 104 05 Stockholm, Sweden.
Genome. 2019 Mar;62(3):147-159. doi: 10.1139/gen-2018-0096. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
The rapid loss of biodiversity, coupled with difficulties in species identification, call for innovative approaches to assess biodiversity. Insects make up a substantial proportion of extant diversity and play fundamental roles in any given ecosystem. To complement morphological species identification, new techniques such as metabarcoding make it possible to quantify insect diversity and insect-ecosystem interactions through DNA sequencing. Here we examine the potential of bulk insect samples (i.e., containing many non-sorted specimens) to assess prokaryote and eukaryote biodiversity and to complement the taxonomic coverage of soil samples. We sampled 25 sites on three continents and in various ecosystems, collecting insects with SLAM traps (Brazil) and Malaise traps (South Africa and Sweden). We then compared our diversity estimates with the results obtained with biodiversity data from soil samples from the same localities. We found a largely different taxonomic composition between the soil and insect samples, testifying to the potential of bulk insect samples to complement soil samples. Finally, we found that non-destructive DNA extraction protocols, which preserve insect specimens for morphological studies, constitute a promising choice for cost-effective biodiversity assessments. We propose that the sampling and sequencing of insect samples should become a standard complement for biodiversity studies based on environmental DNA.
生物多样性的迅速丧失,加上物种鉴定的困难,呼吁我们采用创新方法来评估生物多样性。昆虫在现存多样性中占很大比例,在任何给定的生态系统中都起着基础性作用。为了补充形态学物种鉴定,代谢组学等新技术使我们有可能通过 DNA 测序来量化昆虫多样性和昆虫-生态系统的相互作用。在这里,我们研究了大量昆虫样本(即包含许多未分类标本)评估原核生物和真核生物生物多样性的潜力,并补充土壤样本的分类覆盖范围。我们在三大洲的不同生态系统中采样了 25 个地点,使用 SLAM 陷阱(巴西)和 Malaise 陷阱(南非和瑞典)收集昆虫。然后,我们将我们的多样性估计与来自同一地点的土壤样本的生物多样性数据的结果进行了比较。我们发现土壤和昆虫样本之间的分类组成有很大的不同,证明了大量昆虫样本补充土壤样本的潜力。最后,我们发现,不破坏昆虫标本的 DNA 提取方法对于形态学研究来说是一个有前途的选择,对于具有成本效益的生物多样性评估来说是一个有前途的选择。我们建议,基于环境 DNA 的生物多样性研究应将昆虫样本的采样和测序作为标准补充。