Department of Orthopedics, Deyang Hospital Affiliated to Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Deyang, Sichuan, China.
Department of Rehabilitation, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Sep 2;15:1463587. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1463587. eCollection 2024.
The purpose of this study was to compare different intensities of aerobic exercise for patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in terms of glycemic control, pain relief, and functional outcomes.
A prospective randomized open-label parallel multicenter clinical trial conducted at two hospitals in Shanghai and Sichuan that included 228 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and knee osteoarthritis (KOA). Enrollment occurred between January 2021 and February 2023, and follow-up was completed in September 2023. Participants were randomized to threshold training/high-intensive stationary cycling training (n=76), intensive endurance/moderate-intensive stationary cycling training (n=77), and regular rehabilitation programs (n=75). The primary outcome at the 6-month follow-up was the HbA1c level. Key secondary outcomes included the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscale of pain and quality of life.
Of 228 patients, 212 (93%) completed the trial. The mean adjusted (sex, baseline BMI, and baseline outcome measures) HbA1c level at the 6-month follow-up decreased significantly in the high-intensive training group compared with other groups (high-intensity group vs. control group; difference, 0.51%, 95% confidence interval, 0.05% to 1.15%). Mean KOOS subscales of pain and quality of life were statistically significantly different between the control group and moderate-intensity or high-intensity groups, but no statistical differences were noted between the different intensities of aerobic exercise. Patients in all groups achieved a greater reduction in BMI but no significant differences were observed between groups.
In KOA and T2DM patients, high-intensity stationary cycling can significantly improve glycemic control compared with moderate-intensity and regular rehabilitation programs. However, high-intensity stationary cycling does not exert a superior effect on pain relief and functional improvement for KOA compared with moderate-intensity and regular rehabilitation programs.
本研究旨在比较膝骨关节炎(KOA)合并 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)患者不同强度的有氧运动对血糖控制、疼痛缓解和功能结局的影响。
这是一项在上海和四川的两家医院进行的前瞻性随机开放标签平行多中心临床试验,共纳入 228 例 T2DM 合并 KOA 患者。招募时间为 2021 年 1 月至 2023 年 2 月,随访于 2023 年 9 月完成。患者被随机分为阈强度/高负荷固定自行车训练组(n=76)、高强度耐力/中负荷固定自行车训练组(n=77)和常规康复组(n=75)。主要终点是 6 个月随访时的糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平。次要终点包括膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分(KOOS)量表中的疼痛和生活质量子量表。
在 228 例患者中,有 212 例(93%)完成了试验。与其他组相比,高负荷训练组在 6 个月随访时的 HbA1c 水平调整后(性别、基线 BMI 和基线结局测量)显著下降(高强度组与对照组相比,差值为 0.51%,95%置信区间为 0.05%~1.15%)。与对照组相比,中负荷或高负荷组的 KOOS 量表中的疼痛和生活质量子量表的平均值有统计学差异,但不同强度的有氧运动之间没有统计学差异。所有组的 BMI 都有更大程度的降低,但组间没有显著差异。
在 KOA 和 T2DM 患者中,与中强度和常规康复方案相比,高负荷固定自行车运动可显著改善血糖控制。然而,与中强度和常规康复方案相比,高负荷固定自行车运动对 KOA 的疼痛缓解和功能改善没有更好的效果。