Wei Tingting, Feng Qiao, A Tingting, Hu Shaohua, Ni Ping, Zhuang Dongmei, Yu Shihui
School of Nursing, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2024 Aug 12;11(10):100571. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2024.100571. eCollection 2024 Oct.
This study aimed to identify latent subgroups of dyadic coping (DC) among colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and their spousal caregivers, and to explore the factors associated with these subgroups.
We conducted a cross-sectional study involving 268 pairs of CRC patients and their spousal caregivers. Participants completed the General Information Questionnaire, the Dyadic Coping Inventory, the Cancer-Related Communication Problems Scale, and the Fear of Progress Questionnaire-Short Form. Latent profile analysis (LPA) of DC among CRC couples was performed using Mplus 8.3. We compared couple illness communication, fear of cancer recurrence (FCR), and demographic characteristics between the identified subgroups and conducted ordinal logistic regression analysis to examine factors associated with these subgroups.
The 268 pairs of CRC patients and their spousal caregivers were classified into four subgroups based on their coping levels: low-DC group (12.3%), low common-DC group (7.1%), moderate-DC group (52.6%), and high-DC group (28.0%). Disease stage, couple illness communication, and spouse's FCR were significantly associated with the four subgroups.
There is considerable variability in DC levels among CRC patients and their spousal caregivers. Patients with advanced disease stages, inadequate communication between spouses, and severe RCR exhibit lower levels of DC. These findings provide a theoretical basis for nursing personnel to develop personalized intervention strategies tailored to the characteristics of these subgroups.
本研究旨在识别结直肠癌(CRC)患者及其配偶照顾者二元应对(DC)的潜在亚组,并探讨与这些亚组相关的因素。
我们进行了一项横断面研究,涉及268对CRC患者及其配偶照顾者。参与者完成了一般信息问卷、二元应对量表、癌症相关沟通问题量表和简化版进展恐惧问卷。使用Mplus 8.3对CRC夫妇的DC进行潜在剖面分析(LPA)。我们比较了已识别亚组之间的夫妻疾病沟通、癌症复发恐惧(FCR)和人口统计学特征,并进行有序逻辑回归分析以检查与这些亚组相关的因素。
根据应对水平,268对CRC患者及其配偶照顾者被分为四个亚组:低DC组(12.3%)、低共同DC组(7.1%)、中度DC组(52.6%)和高DC组(28.0%)。疾病分期、夫妻疾病沟通和配偶的FCR与这四个亚组显著相关。
CRC患者及其配偶照顾者的DC水平存在相当大的差异。疾病晚期、配偶之间沟通不足以及严重的RCR患者表现出较低的DC水平。这些发现为护理人员制定针对这些亚组特征的个性化干预策略提供了理论依据。