Yang Wei, Guan Fulin, Yang Lihui, Shou Guangli, Zhu Fangfang, Xu Yuanyuan, Meng Ying, Li Min, Dong Wanli
Department of Neurology, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Department of Neurology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, China.
Front Neurol. 2024 Sep 2;15:1445479. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1445479. eCollection 2024.
Plasma biomarker has the potential to be the reliable and propagable approach in the early stage diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, conventional methods appear powerless in the detection of these biomarkers at low concentrations in plasma. Here, we determined plasma biomarker concentrations of patients across the AD spectrum by an improved digital enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) technique. Confirms the predictive and diagnostic value of this method for AD patients and study the relationships between these biomarkers and cognitive status.
Plasma concentrations of amyloid-beta 40 (Aβ40), amyloid-beta 42 (Aβ42) and plasma phosphorylated tau at threonine 181 (p-tau181) were determined in 43 AD patients, 33 mild cognitive impairment (MCI) patients and 40 normal cognition (NC) subjects as healthy controls using the improved digital ELISA technique. In addition, all subjects were required to receive neuropsychological assessments.
Plasma p-tau181 level showed certain discrepancies between NC and MCI ( 0.05), AD ( 0.01) groups. The level of plasma Aβ42 ( 0.05) and Aβ40 ( 0.01) was significantly different between AD and NC group. The p-tau181 level was able to distinguish AD (AUC = 0.8768) and MCI (AUC = 0.7932) from NC with higher accuracy than Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio (AUC = 0.8343, AUC = 0.6569). Both p-tau181 (CDR: = 0.388 < 0.001; MMSE: = -0.394 < 0.001) and Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio (CDR: = -0.413 < 0.001; MMSE: = 0.358 < 0.001) showed stronger positive correlation with clinical dementia rating (CDR) and mini mental state examination (MMSE) scores than Aβ42 (CDR: = -0.280 = 0.003; MMSE: = 0.266 = 0.005) or Aβ40 (CDR: = 0.373 < 0.001; MMSE: = -0.288 = 0.002) alone.
Plasma p-tau181 level and Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio showed promising values in diagnosis of AD and MCI. Our results indicate that this improved digital ELISA diagnosis approach can facilitate early recognition and management of AD and pre-AD patients.
血浆生物标志物有潜力成为阿尔茨海默病(AD)早期诊断中可靠且可推广的方法。然而,传统方法在检测血浆中低浓度的这些生物标志物时显得无能为力。在此,我们通过一种改进的数字酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)技术测定了AD谱系中患者的血浆生物标志物浓度。证实该方法对AD患者的预测和诊断价值,并研究这些生物标志物与认知状态之间的关系。
使用改进的数字ELISA技术,测定了43例AD患者、33例轻度认知障碍(MCI)患者和40例正常认知(NC)受试者(作为健康对照)血浆中β淀粉样蛋白40(Aβ40)、β淀粉样蛋白42(Aβ42)和苏氨酸181位点的血浆磷酸化tau蛋白(p-tau181)的浓度。此外,所有受试者都需要接受神经心理学评估。
血浆p-tau181水平在NC组和MCI组(P = 0.05)、AD组(P = 0.01)之间显示出一定差异。AD组和NC组之间血浆Aβ42(P = 0.05)和Aβ40(P = 0.01)水平存在显著差异。p-tau181水平能够比Aβ42/Aβ40比值(AUC = 0.8343,AUC = 0.6569)更准确地将AD(AUC = = 0.8768)和MCI(AUC = = 0.7932)与NC区分开来。p-tau181(CDR:r = = 0.388 < 0.001;MMSE:r = = -0.394 < 0.001)和Aβ42/Aβ40比值(CDR:r = = -0.413 < 0.001;MMSE:r = = 0.358 < 0.001)与临床痴呆评定量表(CDR)和简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)评分的正相关性比单独的Aβ42(CDR:r = = -0.280 = = 0.003;MMSE:r = = 0.266 = = 0.005)或Aβ40(CDR:r = = 0.373 < 0.001;MMSE:r = = -0.288 = = 0.002)更强。
血浆p-tau181水平和Aβ42/Aβ40比值在AD和MCI的诊断中显示出有前景的价值。我们的结果表明,这种改进的数字ELISA诊断方法有助于AD和AD前期患者的早期识别和管理。