Suppr超能文献

低危甲状腺微小乳头状癌患者主动监测与即刻 lobectomy 术后患者报告结局的比较:KoMPASS 队列的初步发现。

Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes Between Active Surveillance and Immediate Lobectomy in Patients with Low-Risk Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma: Initial Findings from the KoMPASS Cohort.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.

Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Thyroid. 2024 Nov;34(11):1371-1378. doi: 10.1089/thy.2024.0264. Epub 2024 Oct 8.

Abstract

Patients diagnosed with low-risk papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC) face the decision between thyroid lobectomy and active surveillance (AS). This study aimed to investigate the factors influencing treatment decisions in low-risk PTMC and to compare the quality of life (QoL) according to the treatment plan. The multicenter prospective cohort study comparing AS and thyroid lobectomy was conducted. Clinical characteristics were compared between the AS and Lobectomy groups. QoL questionnaires were administered every 6 months in the initial year and annually thereafter. A total of 927 patients (453 in the AS group and 474 in the Lobectomy group) with low-risk PTMC were included in this study. The mean age was 47.4 ± 12.2 years, and 72.2% of the patients were women. Older age (odd ratio [OR] 1.04, confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.05, < 0.001), smaller tumor size (OR 0.78, CI 0.69-0.87, < 0.001), family history of thyroid cancer (OR 1.48, CI 1.03-2.12, = 0.035), prior awareness of AS (OR 1.53, CI 1.16-2.02, = 0.003), and higher income (OR 1.79, CI 1.13-2.83, = 0.013) were significantly associated with a higher likelihood of choosing AS. The median follow-up was 27.3 months (23.9-43.9) in the AS group and 28.7 months (20.4-44.5) in the Lobectomy group. During the follow-up period, the AS group showed significantly better QoL scores compared with the Lobectomy group ( 0.17, CI 0.02-0.33, = 0.029). Although baseline QoL scores favored the AS group significantly (7.1 ± 1.2 vs. 6.7 ± 1.2, < 0.001), no significant difference was observed after 12 months (7.2 ± 1.2 vs. 7.1 ± 1.2, = 0.592). This study demonstrated that age, tumor size, family history of thyroid cancer, awareness of AS, and income were associated with patients' treatment choices. Although the overall QoL scores were significantly higher in the AS group, the QoL became similar between the two groups after 12 months. KCT0004935.

摘要

患者被诊断为低危甲状腺微小乳头状癌(PTMC)时,需在甲状腺叶切除术和主动监测(AS)之间做出选择。本研究旨在探讨影响低危 PTMC 治疗决策的因素,并比较根据治疗方案的生活质量(QoL)。本研究采用前瞻性多中心队列研究比较 AS 和甲状腺叶切除术。比较 AS 组和甲状腺叶切除组的临床特征。在最初的一年每 6 个月进行 QoL 问卷评估,之后每年进行一次。共纳入 927 例(AS 组 453 例,甲状腺叶切除组 474 例)低危 PTMC 患者。平均年龄为 47.4 ± 12.2 岁,72.2%为女性。年龄较大(优势比 [OR] 1.04,95%置信区间 [CI] 1.02-1.05, < 0.001)、肿瘤较小(OR 0.78,CI 0.69-0.87, < 0.001)、甲状腺癌家族史(OR 1.48,CI 1.03-2.12, = 0.035)、对 AS 的认知(OR 1.53,CI 1.16-2.02, = 0.003)和较高的收入(OR 1.79,CI 1.13-2.83, = 0.013)与选择 AS 的可能性更高显著相关。AS 组的中位随访时间为 27.3 个月(23.9-43.9),甲状腺叶切除组为 28.7 个月(20.4-44.5)。在随访期间,AS 组的 QoL 评分明显优于甲状腺叶切除组( 0.17,CI 0.02-0.33, = 0.029)。尽管基线 QoL 评分明显有利于 AS 组(7.1 ± 1.2 vs. 6.7 ± 1.2, < 0.001),但 12 个月后无显著差异(7.2 ± 1.2 vs. 7.1 ± 1.2, = 0.592)。本研究表明,年龄、肿瘤大小、甲状腺癌家族史、对 AS 的认识和收入与患者的治疗选择有关。尽管 AS 组的总体 QoL 评分明显较高,但 12 个月后两组的 QoL 变得相似。KCT0004935。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验