Naccarelli G V, Fineberg N S, Zipes D P, Heger J J, Duncan G, Prystowsky E N
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1985 Oct;6(4):814-21. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(85)80488-5.
Ventricular tachycardia induced by programmed electrical stimulation during amiodarone therapy often does not preclude a good clinical response. The purpose of this study was to determine whether use of discriminant analysis could distinguish patients who remained asymptomatic from those who subsequently developed symptomatic ventricular tachycardia or cardiac arrest. Studies were performed in 37 patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia who still had ventricular tachycardia induced during programmed electrical stimulation during amiodarone therapy. The mean follow-up time was 14.1 +/- 1.3 months (+/- SEM). Twenty-three patients remained asymptomatic, whereas 14 patients had symptomatic recurrence of their ventricular tachycardia. In patients with recurrence of arrhythmia compared with asymptomatic patients, administration of amiodarone caused a longer ventricular effective refractory period (296 +/- 8 versus 271 +/- 7 ms, p less than 0.05) and a greater change in corrected QT [QTc] interval (90 +/- 18 versus 44 +/- 9 ms, p less than 0.02), but no difference in the decrease in premature ventricular complexes after treatment with amiodarone. During amiodarone therapy, nonbundle branch reentrant repetitive ventricular responses were induced by a single ventricular extrastimulus during sinus rhythm in 9 of 14 patients with recurrent arrhythmias compared with 2 of 21 asymptomatic patients (p = 0.001). Also, less aggressive pacing techniques were required to induce ventricular tachycardia in 9 of 14 symptomatic patients compared with 4 of 23 asymptomatic patients (p less than 0.02).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
在胺碘酮治疗期间,程序性电刺激诱发的室性心动过速通常并不排除良好的临床反应。本研究的目的是确定使用判别分析能否区分仍无症状的患者与随后发生有症状室性心动过速或心脏骤停的患者。对37例持续性室性心动过速患者进行了研究,这些患者在胺碘酮治疗期间进行程序性电刺激时仍可诱发室性心动过速。平均随访时间为14.1±1.3个月(±标准误)。23例患者无症状,而14例患者室性心动过速有症状复发。与无症状患者相比,心律失常复发患者使用胺碘酮后心室有效不应期更长(296±8对271±7毫秒,p<0.05),校正QT[QTc]间期变化更大(90±18对44±9毫秒,p<0.02),但胺碘酮治疗后室性早搏减少无差异。在胺碘酮治疗期间,14例心律失常复发患者中有9例在窦性心律时由单个心室期外刺激诱发非束支折返性反复心室反应,而21例无症状患者中有2例(p = 0.001)。此外,与23例无症状患者中的4例相比,14例有症状患者中有9例诱发室性心动过速所需的起搏技术不那么激进(p<0.02)。(摘要截断于250字)