Suppr超能文献

对于心肌梗死后因室性快速心律失常而接受胺碘酮治疗的患者,诱发室颤预示着猝死。

Induction of ventricular fibrillation predicts sudden death in patients treated with amiodarone because of ventricular tachyarrhythmias after a myocardial infarction.

作者信息

Rodríguez L M, Sternick E B, Smeets J L, Timmermans C, den Dulk K, Oreto G, Wellens H J

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, University of Limburg, Academic Hospital, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Heart. 1996 Jan;75(1):23-8. doi: 10.1136/hrt.75.1.23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the value of programmed electrical stimulation of the heart in predicting sudden death in patients receiving amiodarone to treat ventricular tachyarrhythmias after myocardial infarction.

DESIGN

Consecutive patients; retrospective study.

SETTING

Referral centre for cardiology, academic hospital.

PATIENTS

106 patients with ventricular tachycardia (n = 77) or ventricular fibrillation (n = 29) late after myocardial infarction.

INTERVENTIONS

Programmed electrical stimulation was performed while on amiodarone treatment for at least one month.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

In 80/106 patients either ventricular fibrillation (n = 15) or sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (n = 65) was induced. After a mean follow up of 50 (SD 40) months (1-144), 11 patients died suddenly and two used their implantable cardioverter debfibrillator. By multivariate analysis two predictors for sudden death were found: (1) inducibility of ventricular fibrillation under amiodarone treatment (P << 0.001), and (2) a left ventricular ejection fraction of < 40% (P < 0.05). The survival rate at one, two, three, and five years was 70%, 62%, 62%, and 40% respectively for patients in whom ventricular fibrillation was induced, and 98%, 96%, 94%, 94% for patients with induced sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia. Where there was no sustained arrhythmia, five year survival was 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients receiving amiodarone because of life threatening ventricular arrhythmias after myocardial infarction, inducibility of ventricular fibrillation, but not of sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia, indicates a high risk of sudden death.

摘要

目的

探讨心脏程控电刺激在预测心肌梗死后接受胺碘酮治疗室性快速心律失常患者猝死中的价值。

设计

连续病例;回顾性研究。

地点

学术医院心脏病转诊中心。

患者

106例心肌梗死后晚期发生室性心动过速(n = 77)或心室颤动(n = 29)的患者。

干预措施

在接受胺碘酮治疗至少1个月时进行程控电刺激。

测量指标及主要结果

106例患者中,80例诱发出心室颤动(n = 15)或持续性单形性室性心动过速(n = 65)。平均随访50(标准差40)个月(1 - 144个月)后,11例患者猝死,2例患者使用了植入式心脏复律除颤器。多因素分析发现两个猝死预测因素:(1)胺碘酮治疗下诱发出心室颤动(P << 0.001),(2)左心室射血分数<40%(P < 0.05)。诱发出心室颤动的患者1年、2年、3年和5年生存率分别为70%、62%、62%和40%,诱发出持续性单形性室性心动过速的患者分别为98%、96%、94%、94%。未出现持续性心律失常的患者5年生存率为100%。

结论

在因心肌梗死后危及生命的室性心律失常而接受胺碘酮治疗的患者中,诱发出心室颤动而非持续性单形性室性心动过速提示猝死风险高。

相似文献

5
Amiodarone: clinical trials.胺碘酮:临床试验。
Curr Opin Cardiol. 2000 Jan;15(1):64-72. doi: 10.1097/00001573-200001000-00009.

本文引用的文献

6
Amiodarone pharmacokinetics.胺碘酮的药代动力学
Am Heart J. 1983 Oct;106(4 Pt 2):840-7. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(83)90006-6.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验