Zhao Zhihao, Guo Zeyou, Hu Wenzhong, Long Jie
State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, National Center for Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
J Craniofac Surg. 2025;36(1):84-88. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000010656. Epub 2024 Sep 17.
Although certain orbital fractures are associated with specific clinical symptoms, these relationships should be reviewed comprehensively. The optimal choice between manual preformed mesh implants (MPIs) and patient-specific mesh implants (PSIs) for orbital reconstruction remains undetermined due to inconclusive evidence regarding their effectiveness.
This retrospective study investigated 280 patients with unilateral orbital fractures to explore the correlation between clinical ocular symptoms, including diplopia, enophthalmos, limitation of ocular movement, blindness, and the specific type of orbital fracture. The effects on orbital volume (OV) and orbital volume ratio (OVR) of MPI and PSI with and without the use of navigation were also evaluated in this study. Patients were categorized into 4 groups: MPI, PSI, navigation-assisted MPI, and navigation-assisted PSI. After this categorization, alterations in OV and OVR were analyzed before and after surgical intervention.
Significant correlations were observed between the orbital fracture type and diplopia, enophthalmos, and limitation of ocular movement ( P < 0.05). Patients in the MPI group exhibited a notable difference in the postoperative OV between the injured and normal sides ( P < 0.05), but no statistically significant difference was found in the postoperative OV between the injured and normal sides among the patients in the other 3 groups ( P > 0.05). Moreover, the MPI group demonstrated significantly higher postoperative OVR than the other groups ( P < 0.05). Notably, PSI remained effective with or without navigation, MPI combined with navigation technology achieved a reconstruction quality similar to that of PSI by rectifying positioning errors during surgery.
The authors found significant correlations ( P < 0.05) between orbital fracture type and diplopia, enophthalmos, and limitations of ocular movement. Patient-specific mesh implant plays an important role in orbital reconstruction. It is also a good method for reconstructing orbital fractures using MPI assisted by navigation technology.
尽管某些眼眶骨折与特定的临床症状相关,但这些关系应进行全面回顾。由于关于手动预制网状植入物(MPI)和定制网状植入物(PSI)在眼眶重建中的有效性证据尚无定论,因此两者之间的最佳选择仍未确定。
这项回顾性研究调查了280名单侧眼眶骨折患者,以探讨包括复视、眼球内陷、眼球运动受限、失明等临床眼部症状与眼眶骨折特定类型之间的相关性。本研究还评估了使用和不使用导航的MPI和PSI对眼眶容积(OV)和眼眶容积比(OVR)的影响。患者被分为4组:MPI组、PSI组、导航辅助MPI组和导航辅助PSI组。分组后,分析手术干预前后OV和OVR的变化。
观察到眼眶骨折类型与复视、眼球内陷和眼球运动受限之间存在显著相关性(P<0.05)。MPI组患者伤侧与健侧术后OV有显著差异(P<0.05),但其他3组患者伤侧与健侧术后OV无统计学显著差异(P>0.05)。此外,MPI组术后OVR显著高于其他组(P<0.05)。值得注意的是,PSI无论是否使用导航均有效,MPI结合导航技术通过纠正手术中的定位误差,实现了与PSI相似的重建质量。
作者发现眼眶骨折类型与复视、眼球内陷和眼球运动受限之间存在显著相关性(P<0.05)。定制网状植入物在眼眶重建中起重要作用。使用导航技术辅助的MPI重建眼眶骨折也是一种好方法。