• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

我们能否通过术前 THA 前后位骨盆 X 线片来识别异常骨盆倾斜?

Can we identify abnormal pelvic tilt using pre-THA anteroposterior pelvic radiographs?

机构信息

Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Antwerp, Drie Eikenstraat 655, Edegem, 2650, Antwerp, Belgium.

出版信息

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Nov;144(11):4887-4898. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05575-0. Epub 2024 Sep 17.

DOI:10.1007/s00402-024-05575-0
PMID:39287789
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with increased pelvic tilt (PT) are at risk for instability following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Identification of increased PT using anteroposterior (AP) pelvic radiographs could avoid additional spinopelvic radiographs. This study aimed to (1) describe which AP pelvic parameters most accurately estimate sagittal PT, and (2) determine thresholds for these parameters that can identify patients with increased PT.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, consecutive, cohort study in a tertiary referral hospital on 225 patients (age: 66 ± 12 years-old; 52% female) listed for THA. Patients underwent pre-operative standing AP pelvic radiographs to measure distance- and angular- based parameters from several anatomical landmarks. Sagittal PT was measured on a standing lateral spinopelvic radiograph and considered high when ≥ 20°.

RESULTS

No AP pelvic parameters correlated strongly with sagittal PT. Ratio between horizontal and vertical diameter of the pelvic foramen (C/D ratio) (rho - 0.341; p < 0.001); and vertical distance between trans-SIJ and trans-ASIS line (SITA) (rho 0.307; p < 0.001) correlated moderately with sagittal PT. Sacro-femoral-pubic (SFP) angle < 60° had highest sensitivity (85%), but lowest specificity (52%) to differentiate between patients with and without increased PT. If SITA > 62 mm, C/D ratio < 0.5 and SFP < 60°, specificity increased (88%), but sensitivity was low (49%).

CONCLUSION

In the absence of computerized models, AP pelvic parameters cannot accurately predict sagittal PT. However, an SFP < 60° should alert a hip surgeon that a patient may have an increased PT, and would benefit from additional lateral spinopelvic imaging prior to THA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, diagnostic study.

摘要

背景

骨盆倾斜角(PT)增加的患者在全髋关节置换术后(THA)有不稳定的风险。使用前后位(AP)骨盆 X 线片识别 PT 增加可避免额外的脊柱骨盆 X 线片。本研究旨在:(1)描述哪些 AP 骨盆参数最能准确估计矢状面 PT;(2)确定可识别 PT 增加的这些参数的阈值。

方法

这是在一家三级转诊医院进行的回顾性、连续队列研究,纳入了 225 名接受 THA 的患者(年龄:66±12 岁;52%为女性)。患者接受术前站立位 AP 骨盆 X 线片检查,以测量来自几个解剖标志的距离和角度参数。站立位侧位脊柱骨盆 X 线片测量矢状面 PT,当≥20°时认为 PT 较高。

结果

没有 AP 骨盆参数与矢状面 PT 有很强的相关性。骨盆孔的水平与垂直直径比(C/D 比)(rho-0.341;p<0.001);以及 trans-SIJ 与 trans-ASIS 线之间的垂直距离(SITA)(rho 0.307;p<0.001)与矢状面 PT 中度相关。Sacro-femoral-pubic(SFP)角<60°对区分 PT 增加和无增加的患者具有最高的敏感性(85%),但最低的特异性(52%)。如果 SITA>62mm,C/D 比<0.5 和 SFP<60°,特异性增加(88%),但敏感性低(49%)。

结论

在没有计算机模型的情况下,AP 骨盆参数不能准确预测矢状面 PT。然而,SFP<60°应提醒髋关节外科医生,患者可能存在 PT 增加,并且在接受 THA 之前需要额外的脊柱骨盆侧位成像。

证据水平

II 级,诊断研究。

相似文献

1
Can we identify abnormal pelvic tilt using pre-THA anteroposterior pelvic radiographs?我们能否通过术前 THA 前后位骨盆 X 线片来识别异常骨盆倾斜?
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Nov;144(11):4887-4898. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05575-0. Epub 2024 Sep 17.
2
The accuracy in determining pelvic tilt from anteroposterior pelvic radiographs in patients awaiting hip arthroplasty.等待髋关节置换术患者前后位骨盆X线片中骨盆倾斜度测定的准确性。
J Orthop Res. 2022 Apr;40(4):854-861. doi: 10.1002/jor.25115. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
3
The Berbeo-Sardi Angle (BSA): An Innovative Method to Effectively Estimate Pelvic Retroversion in Anteroposterior Radiographs-A Correlation With Traditional Parameters.贝贝奥-萨尔迪角(BSA):一种在前位X线片中有效估计骨盆后倾的创新方法——与传统参数的相关性
Spine Deform. 2018 Mar-Apr;6(2):105-111. doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2017.08.011. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
4
Pelvic incidence significance relative to spinopelvic risk factors for total hip arthroplasty instability.骨盆入射角与全髋关节置换术不稳定的脊柱骨盆危险因素的相关性。
Bone Joint J. 2022 Mar;104-B(3):352-358. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.104B3.BJJ-2021-0894.R1.
5
Can spinopelvic mobility be predicted in patients awaiting total hip arthroplasty? A prospective, diagnostic study of patients with end-stage hip osteoarthritis.等待全髋关节置换术的患者能否预测脊柱骨盆活动度?终末期髋关节骨关节炎患者的前瞻性诊断研究。
Bone Joint J. 2019 Aug;101-B(8):902-909. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B8.BJJ-2019-0106.R1.
6
Does Periacetabular Osteotomy Change Sagittal Spinopelvic Alignment?髋臼周围截骨术是否改变矢状位脊柱骨盆排列?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1659-1667. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003031. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
7
Pelvic Tilt Evaluation From Frontal Radiographs: The Validity, Interobserver Reliability and Intraobserver Reproducibility of the Sacro-Femoral-Pubic Parameter.基于正位X线片的骨盆倾斜度评估:骶股耻骨参数的有效性、观察者间可靠性和观察者内重复性
J Arthroplasty. 2017 May;32(5):1665-1669. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.11.026. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
8
Does obesity affect acetabular cup position, spinopelvic function and sagittal spinal alignment? A prospective investigation with standing and sitting assessment of primary hip arthroplasty patients.肥胖是否会影响髋臼杯位置、脊柱骨盆功能和矢状位脊柱排列?一项对初次髋关节置换患者进行站立位和坐位评估的前瞻性研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Oct 26;16(1):640. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02716-8.
9
Influence of Spinopelvic Alignment on Pelvic Tilt after Total Hip Arthroplasty.脊柱骨盆对线对全髋关节置换术后骨盆倾斜的影响。
Orthop Surg. 2019 Jun;11(3):438-442. doi: 10.1111/os.12469. Epub 2019 May 31.
10
Importance of the spinopelvic factors on the pelvic inclination from standing to sitting before total hip arthroplasty.全髋关节置换术前从站立到坐姿时,脊柱骨盆因素对骨盆倾斜度的影响。
Eur Spine J. 2016 Nov;25(11):3699-3706. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-4217-2. Epub 2015 Sep 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Spinopelvic challenges in primary total hip arthroplasty.初次全髋关节置换术中的脊柱骨盆挑战
EFORT Open Rev. 2023 May 9;8(5):298-312. doi: 10.1530/EOR-23-0049.
2
The Sacro-femoral-pubic Angle Is Unreliable to Estimate Pelvic Tilt: A Meta-analysis.骶耻-耻骨角估计骨盆倾斜不可靠:一项荟萃分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Oct 1;481(10):1928-1936. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002650. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
3
Pubic Symphysis to Sacrococcygeal Joint: A Poor Correlate to Other Spinopelvic Measurements.耻骨联合至骶尾关节:与其他脊柱骨盆测量值相关性差。
J Arthroplasty. 2023 Aug;38(8):1535-1538. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.01.052. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
4
Measurement of pelvic tilt and rotation on AP radiographs using HipRecon: Validation and comparison to other parameters.使用 HipRecon 测量骨盆倾斜和旋转在 AP 射线上的测量:验证并与其他参数比较。
J Orthop Res. 2023 Aug;41(8):1746-1753. doi: 10.1002/jor.25521. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
5
Spinopelvic Characteristics Normalize 1 Year After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Longitudinal, Case-Controlled Study.全髋关节置换术后1年脊柱骨盆特征恢复正常:一项前瞻性、纵向、病例对照研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2022 Apr 20;104(8):675-683. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.21.01127. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
6
Integrating the Combined Sagittal Index Reduces the Risk of Dislocation Following Total Hip Replacement.整合联合矢状面指数可降低全髋关节置换术后脱位风险。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2022 Mar 2;104(5):397-411. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.21.00432.
7
Rear drop: a new radiographic landmark for estimation of pelvic tilt on pelvis AP radiographs.后方垂直线:骨盆前后位X线片上用于评估骨盆倾斜度的一个新的影像学标志。
J Hip Preserv Surg. 2021 May 5;8(1):58-66. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hnab037. eCollection 2021 Jan.
8
The accuracy in determining pelvic tilt from anteroposterior pelvic radiographs in patients awaiting hip arthroplasty.等待髋关节置换术患者前后位骨盆X线片中骨盆倾斜度测定的准确性。
J Orthop Res. 2022 Apr;40(4):854-861. doi: 10.1002/jor.25115. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
9
The Effect of a Degenerative Spine and Adverse Pelvic Mobility on Prosthetic Impingement in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty.退变性脊柱疾病和骨盆活动不良对全髋关节置换术后假体撞击的影响。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Jul;36(7):2523-2529. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.02.035. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
10
How Does Spinopelvic Mobility and Sagittal Functional Cup Orientation Affect Patient-Reported Outcome 1 Year after THA?-A Prospective Diagnostic Cohort Study.脊柱骨盆活动度和矢状面功能性杯位方向如何影响全髋关节置换术后 1 年的患者报告结局?一项前瞻性诊断队列研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Jul;36(7):2335-2342. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.02.014. Epub 2021 Feb 10.