• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

术前康复方案对接受肿瘤切除术患者功能能力的影响:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Effect of prehabilitation programmes on functional capacity in patients awaiting oncological resections: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

机构信息

Institute for Lifecourse Development, Centre for Exercise Activity and Rehabilitation, School of Human Science, University of Greenwich, Sparrows Farm (Office SF112B), Sparrows Lane, Avery Hill Campus, Eltham, SE9 2TB, England, UK.

QuestPrehab, London, UK.

出版信息

Support Care Cancer. 2024 Sep 17;32(10):667. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08875-8.

DOI:10.1007/s00520-024-08875-8
PMID:39287834
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11408567/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate the effects of prehabilitation on the perioperative functional capacity of patients awaiting oncological resections.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) checklist and within the databases Cochrane Library, EBSCOhost, Google Scholar, MEDLINE PubMed, and Web of Science. The eligibility criteria were set to include peer-reviewed randomised control trials including only adult (≥ 18 years old) patients undergoing any type of prehabilitation (PREHAB) prior to any type of oncological resection. The studies had to feature at least one control group undergoing standard care (SC) and had to assess functional capacity by means of a 6-min walk distance (6MWD) or peak oxygen uptake (VO) at different stages pre- and post- operatively.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven randomised controlled trials involving 1994 patients were included. After processing the data, the number of patients was 1889. Studies featured different cancer specialties: lung (11), colorectal (5), urological (4), abdominal (3), esophagogastric (2), liver (1), and gastrointestinal (1). Overall, PREHAB enhanced both 6MWD (g = 0.273, 95% CI 0.174 to 0.371, Z = 5.406, p < 0.001) and VO (g = 0.615, 95% CI 0.243 to 0.987, Z = 3.240, p = 0.001) compared with SC. The 6MWD subgroup analysis revealed a small mean effect size favouring both unimodal and multimodal PREHAB interventions.

CONCLUSION

These findings support that prehabilitation, whether implemented as unimodal or multimodal format, elicits small preoperative improvements in functional capacity in patients awaiting oncological resections. PROSPERO registration number CRD42023428676.

摘要

目的

研究术前康复对接受肿瘤切除术患者围手术期功能能力的影响。

方法

根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)检查表,并在 Cochrane 图书馆、EBSCOhost、Google Scholar、MEDLINE PubMed 和 Web of Science 数据库中进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。纳入标准为仅纳入接受任何类型术前康复(PREHAB)的成年(≥18 岁)患者的同行评审随机对照试验。这些研究必须至少有一组对照组接受标准护理(SC),并通过术前和术后不同阶段的 6 分钟步行距离(6MWD)或峰值摄氧量(VO)评估功能能力。

结果

共纳入 27 项随机对照试验,涉及 1994 名患者。处理数据后,患者人数为 1889 人。研究涉及不同的癌症专科:肺(11)、结直肠(5)、泌尿(4)、腹部(3)、食管胃(2)、肝(1)和胃肠(1)。总体而言,与 SC 相比,PREHAB 可提高 6MWD(g=0.273,95%CI 0.174 至 0.371,Z=5.406,p<0.001)和 VO(g=0.615,95%CI 0.243 至 0.987,Z=3.240,p=0.001)。6MWD 亚组分析显示,两种单模态和多模态 PREHAB 干预均有利于产生较小的平均效应量。

结论

这些发现支持术前康复,无论是采用单模态还是多模态形式,都能在接受肿瘤切除术的患者中术前改善功能能力。PROSPERO 注册号 CRD42023428676。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d871/11408567/fb5b52c0f07f/520_2024_8875_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d871/11408567/904c31180386/520_2024_8875_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d871/11408567/2ec9a3115515/520_2024_8875_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d871/11408567/df96c1025f47/520_2024_8875_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d871/11408567/2e558e5697dc/520_2024_8875_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d871/11408567/fb5b52c0f07f/520_2024_8875_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d871/11408567/904c31180386/520_2024_8875_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d871/11408567/2ec9a3115515/520_2024_8875_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d871/11408567/df96c1025f47/520_2024_8875_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d871/11408567/2e558e5697dc/520_2024_8875_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d871/11408567/fb5b52c0f07f/520_2024_8875_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of prehabilitation programmes on functional capacity in patients awaiting oncological resections: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.术前康复方案对接受肿瘤切除术患者功能能力的影响:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Sep 17;32(10):667. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08875-8.
2
The effectiveness of exercise prehabilitation on aerobic capacity, muscle strength and body composition in patients with cirrhosis awaiting liver transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.运动康复对等待肝移植的肝硬化患者有氧能力、肌肉力量和身体成分的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
Syst Rev. 2024 Sep 3;13(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02608-y.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Effects of preoperative nutrition and multimodal prehabilitation on functional capacity and postoperative complications in surgical lung cancer patients: a systematic review.术前营养和多模式术前康复对肺癌手术患者功能能力和术后并发症的影响:系统评价。
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Oct;29(10):5597-5610. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06161-5. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
5
Prehabilitation versus no prehabilitation to improve functional capacity, reduce postoperative complications and improve quality of life in colorectal cancer surgery.术前康复与无术前康复在改善结直肠癌手术患者的功能能力、减少术后并发症和提高生活质量方面的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 19;5(5):CD013259. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013259.pub2.
6
Prehabilitation versus no prehabilitation to improve functional capacity, reduce postoperative complications and improve quality of life in colorectal cancer surgery.术前康复与无术前康复比较:改善结直肠癌手术患者的功能能力、减少术后并发症和提高生活质量。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 10;5(5):CD013259. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013259.pub3.
7
A systematic review of prehabilitation programs in abdominal cancer surgery.腹部癌症手术前康复计划的系统评价。
Int J Surg. 2017 Mar;39:156-162. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.01.111. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
8
Effects and duration of exercise-based prehabilitation in surgical therapy of colon and rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.基于运动的术前康复在结直肠癌手术治疗中的效果和持续时间:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2022 Sep;148(9):2187-2213. doi: 10.1007/s00432-022-04088-w. Epub 2022 Jun 13.
9
The effect of preoperative behaviour change interventions on pre- and post-surgery health behaviours, health outcomes, and health inequalities in adults: A systematic review and meta-analyses.术前行为改变干预对成年人手术前后健康行为、健康结果和健康不平等的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 5;18(7):e0286757. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286757. eCollection 2023.
10
Multimodal prehabilitation in elective oncological colorectal surgery enhances postoperative functional recovery: A secondary analysis of the PREHAB randomized clinical trial.择期肿瘤结直肠手术的多模式预康复可增强术后功能恢复:PREHAB 随机临床试验的二次分析。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2024 Jun;50(6):108270. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108270. Epub 2024 Mar 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring factors affecting the implementation of prehabilitation: a descriptive qualitative study from nurses' perspective.探索影响术前康复实施的因素:一项基于护士视角的描述性定性研究
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jul 2;24(1):821. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03466-2.
2
[App-based prehabilitation: implementation and adherence].[基于应用程序的术前康复:实施与依从性]
Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2025 Jun;96(6):459-463. doi: 10.1007/s00104-025-02296-x. Epub 2025 May 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Prehabilitation in colorectal cancer surgery improves outcome and reduces hospital costs.结直肠癌手术前康复可改善预后并降低住院费用。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2024 Jan;50(1):107302. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.107302. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
2
Commentary: Key Aspects of Multimodal Prehabilitation in Surgical Patients With Cancer. A Practical Approach to Integrating Resistance Exercise Programs.述评:癌症手术患者多模式术前康复的要点。整合抗阻运动方案的实用方法。
Eval Health Prof. 2024 Sep;47(3):336-342. doi: 10.1177/01632787231218993. Epub 2023 Nov 30.
3
The effect of physical exercise on anticancer immunity.
体育锻炼对抗癌免疫的影响。
Nat Rev Immunol. 2024 Apr;24(4):282-293. doi: 10.1038/s41577-023-00943-0. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
4
Effect of home-based prehabilitation on postoperative complications after surgery for gastric cancer: randomized clinical trial.基于家庭的术前康复对胃癌手术后术后并发症的影响:随机临床试验。
Br J Surg. 2023 Nov 9;110(12):1800-1807. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad312.
5
Effect of Multimodal Prehabilitation on Reducing Postoperative Complications and Enhancing Functional Capacity Following Colorectal Cancer Surgery: The PREHAB Randomized Clinical Trial.多模式术前康复对减少结直肠癌手术后并发症和增强功能能力的影响:PREHAB 随机临床试验。
JAMA Surg. 2023 Jun 1;158(6):572-581. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.0198.
6
Exercise and quality of life in cancer.癌症患者的运动与生活质量
J Sport Health Sci. 2023 Jul;12(4):489-490. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2023.01.001. Epub 2023 Jan 6.
7
Effects and duration of exercise-based prehabilitation in surgical therapy of colon and rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.基于运动的术前康复在结直肠癌手术治疗中的效果和持续时间:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2022 Sep;148(9):2187-2213. doi: 10.1007/s00432-022-04088-w. Epub 2022 Jun 13.
8
Prehabilitation versus no prehabilitation to improve functional capacity, reduce postoperative complications and improve quality of life in colorectal cancer surgery.术前康复与无术前康复在改善结直肠癌手术患者的功能能力、减少术后并发症和提高生活质量方面的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 19;5(5):CD013259. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013259.pub2.
9
'Fit for surgery': the relationship between cardiorespiratory fitness and postoperative outcomes.“适合手术”:心肺适能与术后结果的关系。
Exp Physiol. 2022 Aug;107(8):787-799. doi: 10.1113/EP090156. Epub 2022 Jun 5.
10
Fit4Surgery for cancer patients during covid-19 lockdown - A systematic review and meta-analysis.新冠疫情封锁期间癌症患者的 Fit4Surgery - 系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2022 Jun;48(6):1189-1197. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.02.010. Epub 2022 Feb 9.