• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

按族裔划分的医疗保险捆绑支付计划治疗关节置换术后的结果。

Outcomes by Race and Ethnicity Following a Medicare Bundled Payment Program for Joint Replacement.

机构信息

Leonard Davis School of Gerontology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.

USC Leonard D. Schaeffer Center for Health Policy & Economics, Los Angeles, California.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2433962. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.33962.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.33962
PMID:39287943
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11409153/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

The Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) model, a traditional Medicare bundled payment program for lower-extremity joint replacement, is associated with care for patients outside traditional Medicare. Whether CJR model outcomes have differed by patient race or ethnicity outside of traditional Medicare is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate outcomes associated with the CJR model among Hispanic patients not enrolled in traditional Medicare.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study used hospitalization data from California's Patient Discharge Dataset for all patients who underwent lower-extremity joint replacement in California between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2017. In California, 3 metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) were randomly selected to participate in CJR in April 2016. Hospitals not participating in other Medicare Alternative Payment Models were included in the treated group if they were in these 3 MSAs and in the control group if they were in the remaining 23 MSAs. The data analysis was performed between October 1 and December 31, 2023.

EXPOSURE

Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement program implementation.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The main outcomes were hospital length of stay and home discharge rates by race and ethnicity. Home discharge status included self-care, the use of home health services, and hospice care at home. Event study, difference-in-differences, and triple differences models were used to estimate differential changes in health care service use by race and ethnicity for patients in the treated MSAs compared with the control MSAs before vs after CJR implementation.

RESULTS

Of 309 834 hospitalizations (patient mean [SD] age, 68.3 [11.3] years; 60.6% women; 14.8% Hispanic; 72.4% non-Hispanic White), 48.0% were in treated MSAs and 52.0% in control MSAs. The CJR program was associated with an increase in home discharge rates for patients without traditional Medicare coverage; however, the increase differed by patient race and ethnicity. The increase was 0.05 (95% CI, 0.02-0.08) percentage points higher for Hispanic patients with Medicare Advantage and 0.03 (95% CI, 0.01-0.04) percentage points higher for Hispanic patients without Medicare compared with their non-Hispanic White counterparts.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This cohort study shows that CJR program outcomes differed by race and ethnicity for patients covered outside traditional Medicare, with home discharge rates increasing more for Hispanic compared with non-Hispanic White patients. These findings suggest the importance of considering differential outcomes of Medicare payment policies for racial and ethnic minority patient populations beyond the initially targeted groups.

摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b0e/11409153/658b1302b8c0/jamanetwopen-e2433962-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b0e/11409153/658b1302b8c0/jamanetwopen-e2433962-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b0e/11409153/658b1302b8c0/jamanetwopen-e2433962-g001.jpg

重要性

综合关节置换护理(CJR)模式是一种针对下肢关节置换的传统医疗保险捆绑支付计划,与医疗保险以外的患者护理有关。CJR 模式的结果是否因医疗保险以外的患者的种族或族裔而有所不同尚不清楚。

目的

评估 CJR 模式在未参加传统医疗保险的西班牙裔患者中的结果。

设计、地点和参与者:本队列研究使用了加利福尼亚州患者出院数据集在加利福尼亚州接受下肢关节置换手术的所有患者的住院数据,时间为 2014 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 12 月 31 日。加利福尼亚州有 3 个都会统计区(MSA)于 2016 年 4 月被随机选中参加 CJR。如果医院未参与其他医疗保险替代支付模式,且位于这 3 个 MSA 中,则将其纳入治疗组;如果医院位于其余 23 个 MSA 中,则将其纳入对照组。数据分析于 2023 年 10 月 1 日至 12 月 31 日进行。

暴露因素

综合关节置换护理计划的实施。

主要结局和测量方法

主要结局是根据种族和族裔的住院时间和家庭出院率。家庭出院状况包括自理、家庭健康服务的使用以及在家中的临终关怀。采用事件研究、差异中的差异和三重差异模型,估计在 CJR 实施前后,治疗 MSA 与对照 MSA 中患者的种族和族裔对医疗服务使用的差异变化。

结果

在 309834 例住院治疗中(患者平均[标准差]年龄为 68.3[11.3]岁;60.6%为女性;14.8%为西班牙裔;72.4%为非西班牙裔白人),48.0%来自治疗 MSA,52.0%来自对照 MSA。CJR 计划与未参加传统医疗保险的患者的家庭出院率增加有关;然而,这种增加因患者的种族和族裔而异。与非西班牙裔白人患者相比,参加医疗保险优势计划的西班牙裔患者的增加幅度高 0.05(95%CI,0.02-0.08)个百分点,未参加医疗保险的西班牙裔患者的增加幅度高 0.03(95%CI,0.01-0.04)个百分点。

结论和相关性

本队列研究表明,对于医疗保险覆盖范围以外的患者,CJR 计划的结果因种族和族裔而异,与非西班牙裔白人患者相比,西班牙裔患者的家庭出院率增加更多。这些发现表明,在最初目标群体之外,考虑医疗保险支付政策对少数民族患者群体的不同结果的重要性。

相似文献

1
Outcomes by Race and Ethnicity Following a Medicare Bundled Payment Program for Joint Replacement.按族裔划分的医疗保险捆绑支付计划治疗关节置换术后的结果。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2433962. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.33962.
2
Association of the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement Model With Disparities in the Use of Total Hip and Total Knee Replacement.综合关节置换护理模式与全髋关节和全膝关节置换使用差异的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e2111858. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.11858.
3
Mandatory Medicare Bundled Payment Program for Lower Extremity Joint Replacement and Discharge to Institutional Postacute Care: Interim Analysis of the First Year of a 5-Year Randomized Trial.强制性医疗保险捆绑支付计划,用于下肢关节置换和转至机构性康复治疗:一项 5 年随机试验的第一年中期分析。
JAMA. 2018 Sep 4;320(9):892-900. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.12346.
4
Medicare's comprehensive care for joint replacement model increased public hospitals' inpatient length of stay.医疗保险的全面关节置换护理模式增加了公立医院的住院时间。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 28;24(1):1495. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11905-0.
5
Association of Medicare Mandatory Bundled Payment System for Hip and Knee Joint Replacement With Racial/Ethnic Difference in Joint Replacement Care.医疗保险强制性捆绑支付系统与髋关节和膝关节置换护理的种族/民族差异之间的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Sep 1;3(9):e2014475. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.14475.
6
Association of Medicare Mandatory Bundled Payment Program With the Receipt of Elective Hip and Knee Replacement in White, Black, and Hispanic Beneficiaries.医疗保险强制性捆绑支付计划与白种人、黑种人和西班牙裔受益人接受选择性髋关节和膝关节置换的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Mar 1;4(3):e211772. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.1772.
7
The spillover effects of Medicare's comprehensive care for joint replacement (CJR) model in California.医疗保险关节置换综合护理(CJR)模式在加利福尼亚州的溢出效应。
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 17;20(4):e0319582. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319582. eCollection 2025.
8
Evaluation of Economic and Clinical Outcomes Under Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Mandatory Bundled Payments for Joint Replacements.医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心强制性联合支付对关节置换术的经济和临床结果的评估。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Jul 1;179(7):924-931. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0480.
9
Association of Medicare Mandatory Bundled Payment Reform With Joint Replacement Surgery Use for Beneficiaries With Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias.医疗保险强制性捆绑支付改革与阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆症受益人的关节置换手术使用的关联。
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Feb 11;3(2):e215111. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.5111. eCollection 2022 Feb.
10
Hospital Responses to Incentives in Episode-Based Payment for Joint Surgery: A Controlled Population-Based Study.基于病例组支付的关节手术激励措施下医院的反应:一项基于人群的对照研究。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Jul 1;181(7):932-940. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.1897.

引用本文的文献

1
Pharmacological Intervention with 4-Phenylbutyrate Ameliorates TiAl6V4 Nanoparticles-Induced Inflammatory Osteolysis by Promoting Macrophage Apoptosis.4-苯基丁酸的药理干预通过促进巨噬细胞凋亡减轻TiAl6V4纳米颗粒诱导的炎性骨溶解。
Bioengineering (Basel). 2025 Jun 27;12(7):701. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12070701.
2
Association between metallic implants and stroke in US adults from NHANES 2015-2023 a cross-sectional study.2015 - 2023年美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)中成年人体内金属植入物与中风之间的关联:一项横断面研究
Front Aging Neurosci. 2024 Dec 20;16:1505645. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2024.1505645. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Race and Sex Disparities in Lower Extremity Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Database Study.下肢全关节置换术中的种族和性别差异:一项回顾性数据库研究。
Cureus. 2023 Jul 26;15(7):e42485. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42485. eCollection 2023 Jul.
2
Racial Differences in Care and Outcomes After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasties: Did the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement Program Make a Difference?种族差异对全髋关节和膝关节置换术后的护理和结局的影响:综合关节置换护理计划是否有影响?
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2022 Jun 1;104(11):949-958. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.21.00465. Epub 2022 Apr 15.
3
Association of Medicare bundled payment model with joint replacement care for people with dementia.
Medicare's comprehensive care for joint replacement model increased public hospitals' inpatient length of stay.
医疗保险的全面关节置换护理模式增加了公立医院的住院时间。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 28;24(1):1495. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11905-0.
医疗保险捆绑支付模式与痴呆患者关节置换护理的关联。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Sep;70(9):2571-2581. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17836. Epub 2022 May 30.
4
Impact of the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement model on patient-reported outcomes.综合关节置换护理模式对患者报告结局的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2022 Oct;57(5):1094-1103. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13966. Epub 2022 May 4.
5
Race, Utilization, and Outcomes in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review on Health-Care Disparities.种族、利用情况和全髋关节及膝关节置换术的结局:卫生保健差异的系统评价。
JBJS Rev. 2022 Mar 1;10(3):01874474-202203000-00003. doi: e21.00161.
6
Patient selection in the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement model.关节置换综合护理模式中的患者选择。
Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb;57(1):72-90. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13880. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
7
Hospital Responses to Incentives in Episode-Based Payment for Joint Surgery: A Controlled Population-Based Study.基于病例组支付的关节手术激励措施下医院的反应:一项基于人群的对照研究。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Jul 1;181(7):932-940. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.1897.
8
Association of Medicare Mandatory Bundled Payment System for Hip and Knee Joint Replacement With Racial/Ethnic Difference in Joint Replacement Care.医疗保险强制性捆绑支付系统与髋关节和膝关节置换护理的种族/民族差异之间的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Sep 1;3(9):e2014475. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.14475.
9
Randomized trial shows healthcare payment reform has equal-sized spillover effects on patients not targeted by reform.随机试验表明,医疗保健支付改革对未被改革针对的患者产生了同等规模的溢出效应。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Aug 11;117(32):18939-18947. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2004759117. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
10
Association of Mandatory Bundled Payments for Joint Replacement With Use of Postacute Care Among Medicare Advantage Enrollees.强制性捆绑支付对医疗保险优势计划参保者人工关节置换术后使用后期护理的影响。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Dec 2;2(12):e1918535. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18535.