• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

信息图表的语言:迈向理解科学叙事中概念隐喻的运用

The Language of Infographics: Toward Understanding Conceptual Metaphor Use in Scientific Storytelling.

作者信息

Pokojna Hana, Isenberg Tobias, Bruckner Stefan, Kozlikova Barbora, Garrison Laura

出版信息

IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2025 Jan;31(1):371-381. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2024.3456327. Epub 2024 Nov 25.

DOI:10.1109/TVCG.2024.3456327
PMID:39288063
Abstract

We apply an approach from cognitive linguistics by mapping Conceptual Metaphor Theory (CMT) to the visualization domain to address patterns of visual conceptual metaphors that are often used in science infographics. Metaphors play an essential part in visual communication and are frequently employed to explain complex concepts. However, their use is often based on intuition, rather than following a formal process. At present, we lack tools and language for understanding and describing metaphor use in visualization to the extent where taxonomy and grammar could guide the creation of visual components, e.g., infographics. Our classification of the visual conceptual mappings within scientific representations is based on the breakdown of visual components in existing scientific infographics. We demonstrate the development of this mapping through a detailed analysis of data collected from four domains (biomedicine, climate, space, and anthropology) that represent a diverse range of visual conceptual metaphors used in the visual communication of science. This work allows us to identify patterns of visual conceptual metaphor use within the domains, resolve ambiguities about why specific conceptual metaphors are used, and develop a better overall understanding of visual metaphor use in scientific infographics. Our analysis shows that ontological and orientational conceptual metaphors are the most widely applied to translate complex scientific concepts. To support our findings we developed a visual exploratory tool based on the collected database that places the individual infographics on a spatio-temporal scale and illustrates the breakdown of visual conceptual metaphors.

摘要

我们运用认知语言学的方法,将概念隐喻理论(CMT)映射到可视化领域,以研究科学信息图表中常用的视觉概念隐喻模式。隐喻在视觉传达中起着至关重要的作用,常用于解释复杂概念。然而,其使用往往基于直觉,而非遵循正式流程。目前,我们缺乏理解和描述可视化中隐喻使用的工具和语言,以至于分类法和语法无法指导视觉组件(如信息图表)的创建。我们对科学表征中的视觉概念映射进行分类,是基于对现有科学信息图表中视觉组件的分解。我们通过对从四个领域(生物医学、气候、空间和人类学)收集的数据进行详细分析,展示了这种映射的发展,这四个领域代表了科学视觉传达中使用的各种视觉概念隐喻。这项工作使我们能够识别各领域内视觉概念隐喻的使用模式,解决关于为何使用特定概念隐喻的歧义,并更好地全面理解科学信息图表中视觉隐喻的使用。我们的分析表明,本体论和方位概念隐喻最广泛地用于翻译复杂的科学概念。为支持我们的研究结果,我们基于收集的数据库开发了一个视觉探索工具,该工具将各个信息图表置于时空尺度上,并展示视觉概念隐喻的分解情况。

相似文献

1
The Language of Infographics: Toward Understanding Conceptual Metaphor Use in Scientific Storytelling.信息图表的语言:迈向理解科学叙事中概念隐喻的运用
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2025 Jan;31(1):371-381. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2024.3456327. Epub 2024 Nov 25.
2
Perspectives on the insidious nature of pain metaphor: we literally need to change our metaphors.关于疼痛隐喻的潜在本质的观点:我们确实需要改变我们的隐喻。
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2023 Sep 15;4:1224139. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2023.1224139. eCollection 2023.
3
The career of metaphor.隐喻的历程。
Psychol Rev. 2005 Jan;112(1):193-216. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.112.1.193.
4
Are metaphors embodied? The neural evidence.隐喻是否具有身体性?神经学证据。
Psychol Res. 2022 Nov;86(8):2417-2433. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01604-4.
5
Metaphors as models: Towards a typology of metaphor in ancient science.隐喻作为模型:探索古代科学中隐喻的类型学。
Hist Philos Life Sci. 2021 Aug 18;43(3):101. doi: 10.1007/s40656-021-00450-2.
6
Metaphor processing is supramodal semantic processing: The role of the bilateral lateral temporal regions in multimodal communication.隐喻处理是超模态语义处理:双侧颞叶区域在多模态交流中的作用。
Brain Lang. 2020 Jun;205:104772. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2020.104772. Epub 2020 Feb 29.
7
Of magnitudes and metaphors: explaining cognitive interactions between space, time, and number.论数量与隐喻:解释空间、时间和数字之间的认知交互
Cortex. 2015 Mar;64:209-24. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2014.10.015. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
8
Hemispheric Processing of Chinese Scientific Metaphors: Evidence Hemifield Presentation.中文科学隐喻的半球加工:来自半视野呈现的证据
Front Psychol. 2022 May 26;13:894715. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.894715. eCollection 2022.
9
Global bibliometric analysis of conceptual metaphor research over the recent two decades.近二十年概念隐喻研究的全球文献计量分析
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 10;14:1042121. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1042121. eCollection 2023.
10
ERP evidence for conceptual mappings and comparison processes during the comprehension of conventional and novel metaphors.ERP 研究证据表明,在理解常规隐喻和新颖隐喻时,存在概念映射和比较过程。
Brain Lang. 2013 Dec;127(3):484-96. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2013.09.010. Epub 2013 Oct 29.