• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

近二十年概念隐喻研究的全球文献计量分析

Global bibliometric analysis of conceptual metaphor research over the recent two decades.

作者信息

Zhao Xia, Zheng Yi, Zhao Xincheng

机构信息

School of Foreign Languages, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang, China.

Center for Applied English Studies, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 10;14:1042121. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1042121. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1042121
PMID:36844282
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9951592/
Abstract

Conceptual Metaphor has been a prevalent theme in the linguistic field for the recent twenty years. Numerous scholars worldwide have shown interest in it and published many academic papers from various stances on this topic. However, so far, there have been few rigorous scientific mapping investigations. With the help of bibliometric analysis tool, we selected 1,257 articles on Conceptual Metaphors published from 2002 to 2022, as collected in the Web of Sciences Core Collection database, from unique cognitive perspectives. The global annual scientific output of Conceptual Metaphor, including the cited articles, sources, keywords, and research trends, will be examined in this study. The most notable findings of this study are the following. First, there has been an upward trend in Conceptual Metaphor research over the last two decades. Second, the five most prominent research groups on Conceptual Metaphors are in Spain, the United States of America, China, Great Britain, and Russia. Third, future research on Conceptual Metaphors may focus on corpus linguistics, neurolinguistics, psychology, and critical discourse analysis. The interdisciplinary study may enhance the growth of Conceptual Metaphors.

摘要

概念隐喻在近二十年来一直是语言学领域的一个普遍主题。全球众多学者都对其表现出兴趣,并就该主题从各种立场发表了许多学术论文。然而,到目前为止,很少有严谨的科学图谱研究。借助文献计量分析工具,我们从独特的认知视角,选取了2002年至2022年发表在科学网核心合集数据库中的1257篇关于概念隐喻的文章。本研究将考察概念隐喻的全球年度科学产出,包括被引文章、来源、关键词和研究趋势。本研究最显著的发现如下。第一,在过去二十年里,概念隐喻研究呈上升趋势。第二,关于概念隐喻的五个最突出的研究群体分别在西班牙、美国、中国、英国和俄罗斯。第三,概念隐喻的未来研究可能集中在语料库语言学、神经语言学、心理学和批判性话语分析上。跨学科研究可能会促进概念隐喻研究的发展。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1616/9951592/37dcde299da0/fpsyg-14-1042121-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1616/9951592/dc3d27cb6056/fpsyg-14-1042121-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1616/9951592/e7f7f1b5914b/fpsyg-14-1042121-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1616/9951592/21aac0128620/fpsyg-14-1042121-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1616/9951592/a26e117cc794/fpsyg-14-1042121-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1616/9951592/d47c3b4ce48f/fpsyg-14-1042121-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1616/9951592/5a32b03ee7b7/fpsyg-14-1042121-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1616/9951592/c82ef3a4a705/fpsyg-14-1042121-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1616/9951592/ffc14cbe8688/fpsyg-14-1042121-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1616/9951592/5741c3f89403/fpsyg-14-1042121-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1616/9951592/23e1431ea2ea/fpsyg-14-1042121-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1616/9951592/1cb7605d5468/fpsyg-14-1042121-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1616/9951592/70d67d26c5fd/fpsyg-14-1042121-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1616/9951592/76f52045c32d/fpsyg-14-1042121-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1616/9951592/37dcde299da0/fpsyg-14-1042121-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1616/9951592/dc3d27cb6056/fpsyg-14-1042121-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1616/9951592/e7f7f1b5914b/fpsyg-14-1042121-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1616/9951592/21aac0128620/fpsyg-14-1042121-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1616/9951592/a26e117cc794/fpsyg-14-1042121-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1616/9951592/d47c3b4ce48f/fpsyg-14-1042121-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1616/9951592/5a32b03ee7b7/fpsyg-14-1042121-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1616/9951592/c82ef3a4a705/fpsyg-14-1042121-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1616/9951592/ffc14cbe8688/fpsyg-14-1042121-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1616/9951592/5741c3f89403/fpsyg-14-1042121-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1616/9951592/23e1431ea2ea/fpsyg-14-1042121-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1616/9951592/1cb7605d5468/fpsyg-14-1042121-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1616/9951592/70d67d26c5fd/fpsyg-14-1042121-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1616/9951592/76f52045c32d/fpsyg-14-1042121-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1616/9951592/37dcde299da0/fpsyg-14-1042121-g014.jpg

相似文献

1
Global bibliometric analysis of conceptual metaphor research over the recent two decades.近二十年概念隐喻研究的全球文献计量分析
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 10;14:1042121. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1042121. eCollection 2023.
2
Bibliometric assessment of world scholars' international publications related to conceptual metaphor.关于概念隐喻的世界学者国际出版物的文献计量评估
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 22;13:1071121. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1071121. eCollection 2022.
3
Research trends in multimodal metaphor: a bibliometric analysis.多模态隐喻的研究趋势:文献计量分析
Front Psychol. 2023 Apr 17;14:1144725. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1144725. eCollection 2023.
4
"Invader or Inhabitant?" - Competing Metaphors for the COVID-19 Pandemic.“入侵者还是居住者?”- 新冠疫情的竞争隐喻。
Health Commun. 2023 Oct;38(10):2099-2105. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2022.2054101. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
5
Current perspectives and trends of CD39-CD73-eAdo/A2aR research in tumor microenvironment: a bibliometric analysis.肿瘤微环境中 CD39-CD73-eAdo/A2aR 研究的现状和趋势:文献计量学分析。
Front Immunol. 2024 Aug 12;15:1427380. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1427380. eCollection 2024.
6
The Language of Infographics: Toward Understanding Conceptual Metaphor Use in Scientific Storytelling.信息图表的语言:迈向理解科学叙事中概念隐喻的运用
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2025 Jan;31(1):371-381. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2024.3456327. Epub 2024 Nov 25.
7
Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization Mapping of Anthrax Vaccine Publications from 1991 through 2021.1991年至2021年炭疽疫苗出版物的文献计量分析与可视化图谱
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Jun 23;10(7):1007. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10071007.
8
Bibliometric, network, and thematic mapping analyses of metaphor and discourse in COVID-19 publications from 2020 to 2022.2020年至2022年新冠疫情出版物中隐喻和话语的文献计量、网络和主题映射分析。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 16;13:1062943. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1062943. eCollection 2022.
9
A Bibliometric and Scientific Knowledge Map Study of Migraine Treatment from 2013 to 2022.2013年至2022年偏头痛治疗的文献计量学与科学知识图谱研究
J Pain Res. 2023 Sep 15;16:3169-3184. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S412158. eCollection 2023.
10
Global Trends in Research of Gouty Arthritis Over Past Decade: A Bibliometric Analysis.过去十年痛风性关节炎研究的全球趋势:文献计量分析。
Front Immunol. 2022 Jun 10;13:910400. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.910400. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
COVID-19 research in management: An updated bibliometric analysis.管理学领域的新冠疫情研究:最新文献计量分析
J Bus Res. 2022 Oct;149:795-810. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.082. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
2
Editorial: Experimental Approaches to Pragmatics.社论:语用学的实验方法
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 19;13:865737. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.865737. eCollection 2022.
3
Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Review of Global Coronavirus Research Trends Before COVID-19: Prospects and Implications for COVID-19 Research.COVID-19 之前全球冠状病毒研究趋势的文献计量分析与系统综述:对 COVID-19 研究的展望与启示
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Nov 16;8:729138. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.729138. eCollection 2021.
4
Mapping research strands of ethics of artificial intelligence in healthcare: A bibliometric and content analysis.绘制医疗人工智能伦理研究脉络:文献计量与内容分析。
Comput Biol Med. 2021 Aug;135:104660. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104660. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
5
Conceptual Conflicts in Metaphors and Pragmatic Strategies for Their Translation.隐喻中的概念冲突及其翻译的语用策略
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 13;12:662276. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.662276. eCollection 2021.
6
Bibliometric analysis of the refractive error field.屈光不正领域的文献计量分析
Clin Exp Optom. 2021 Jul;104(5):641-643. doi: 10.1080/08164622.2021.1880868. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
7
A Bibliometric Analysis of Advanced Healthcare Materials: Research Trends of Biomaterials in Healthcare Application.先进医疗材料的文献计量分析:生物材料在医疗应用中的研究趋势。
Adv Healthc Mater. 2021 May;10(10):e2002222. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202002222. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
8
Invoking culture in medical education research: A critical review and metaphor analysis.在医学教育研究中引入文化因素:批判性评价与隐喻分析。
Med Educ. 2021 Aug;55(8):903-911. doi: 10.1111/medu.14464. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
9
Analysis of environmental taxes publications: a bibliometric and systematic literature review.环境税文献分析:文献计量和系统综述。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Apr;28(16):20700-20716. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-12123-x. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
10
Investigating the emerging COVID-19 research trends in the field of business and management: A bibliometric analysis approach.探究商业与管理领域中新兴的新冠病毒研究趋势:一种文献计量分析方法。
J Bus Res. 2020 Sep;118:253-261. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.057. Epub 2020 Jul 2.