Independent researcher, Hamilton, Bermuda.
Department of Public Health, Coventry University, Coventry, England.
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 17;19(9):e0279792. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279792. eCollection 2024.
This paper utilizes an ontological approach to conduct a qualitative literature review in order to investigate the emotional impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on nurses internationally. After identifying common themes in the literature review, primary research is conducted to investigate the emotional impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on nurses working in Bermuda´s only acute healthcare facility.
The literature review used the FRAMEWORK approach (Richie and Spencer, 1994, as cited in Hackett et al. (2018) to select a total of 16 papers for review, each of them qualitative primary research, aside from one paper reviewing international literature. Within the second part of this paper, investigating the experience of nurses in Bermuda, a grounded theory approach was utilised to collect primary data. Convenience sampling was used to recruit subjects to participate in one-on-one semi-structured interviews. Data saturation was achieved after 9 interviews. The FRAMEWORK method was utilised to analyse the interview transcripts, and identify, organise and collate themes.
The literature review highlights that nurses have strong emotional responses to caring for patients during the Covid-19 pandemic. Specific responses include: higher stress levels at work due to higher, more challenging workload, and a reliance on clinical leaders to assuage this stress. Stigma experienced outside of work lead to feelings of anxiety and isolation. Despite this, there was a common theme that nurses felt a satisfaction within their role to ´play their part´ in the pandemic. The primary research conducted in Bermuda demonstrates that there was an initial fear of Covid-19, receding as the pandemic developed. Much anxiety was due to a perceived lack of knowledge about the disease, lack of a coherent strategy, and inadequate equipment to protect staff, and properly care for patients. An increased level of cooperation amongst staff, and mutual support amongst nurses was noted, as was social stigma leading to feelings of isolation and anxiety. Social interactions and holistic activities were identified as primary resources to alleviate stress and uncertainty.
Nurses in Bermuda elicited many of the same emotional responses as their international colleagues, as a result of caring for patients during the pandemic. These manifested as a result of higher, more challenging workload, and uncertainty about preparedness plan and quickly changing situations within the working environment. The results from this study can help formulate changes in policy to ensure smoother transitions to pandemic preparedness in the future.
本文利用本体论方法对国际护士在新冠疫情期间的情绪影响进行定性文献综述。在文献综述中确定共同主题后,进行了初步研究,以调查在百慕大唯一的急性医疗机构工作的护士在新冠疫情期间的情绪影响。
文献综述使用 FRAMEWORK 方法(富奇和斯宾塞,1994 年,哈克特等人引用(2018 年)选择了总共 16 篇论文进行综述,除了一篇综述国际文献的论文外,其余都是定性的原始研究。在本文的第二部分,调查百慕大护士的经验,使用扎根理论方法收集原始数据。采用便利抽样招募受试者参加一对一的半结构化访谈。在 9 次访谈后达到数据饱和。使用 FRAMEWORK 方法分析访谈记录,识别、组织和整理主题。
文献综述强调,护士在新冠疫情期间照顾患者时会产生强烈的情绪反应。具体反应包括:由于工作量更高、更具挑战性,工作压力更高,以及依赖临床领导来缓解这种压力。工作之外的污名化导致焦虑和孤立感。尽管如此,有一种共同的主题是,护士感到在疫情中“发挥自己的作用”有一种满足感。在百慕大进行的初步研究表明,最初对新冠疫情感到恐惧,随着疫情的发展而消退。由于对疾病缺乏了解、缺乏协调一致的策略以及设备不足来保护员工和妥善照顾患者,导致了很多焦虑。工作人员之间的合作水平提高,护士之间相互支持,同时也存在社会污名化导致的孤立和焦虑感。社会互动和整体活动被确定为缓解压力和不确定性的主要资源。
百慕大的护士与国际同行一样,由于在疫情期间照顾患者,产生了许多相同的情绪反应。这些反应是由于工作量更高、更具挑战性,以及对准备计划和工作环境中快速变化的情况的不确定性所致。这项研究的结果可以帮助制定政策变化,以确保未来更顺利地过渡到大流行准备状态。