Centre for Law and Genetics, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
Faculty of Business and Law, Australian Centre for Health Law Research, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 17;14(1):21685. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-72653-z.
One of the most common terms that is used to describe entities responsible for sharing genomic data for research purposes is 'genomic research consortium'. However, there is a lack of clarity around the language used by consortia to describe their data sharing arrangements. Calls have been made for more uniform terminology. This article reports on a review of the genomic research consortium literature illustrating a wide diversity in the language that has been used over time to describe the access arrangements of these entities. The second component of this research involved an examination of publicly available information from a dataset of 98 consortia. This analysis further illustrates the wide diversity in the access arrangements adopted by genomic research consortia. A total of 12 different access arrangements were identified, including four simple forms (open, consortium, managed and registered access) and eight more complex tiered forms (for example, a combination of consortium, managed and open access). The majority of consortia utilised some form of tiered access, often following the policy requirements of funders like the US National Institutes of Health and the UK Wellcome Trust. It was not always easy to precisely identify the access arrangements of individual consortia. Greater consistency, clarity and transparency is likely to be of benefit to donors, depositors and accessors alike. More work needs to be done to achieve this end.
用于描述负责为研究目的共享基因组数据的实体的最常见术语之一是“基因组研究联盟”。然而,对于联盟用来描述其数据共享安排的语言,存在着缺乏明确性的问题。有人呼吁使用更统一的术语。本文报告了对基因组研究联盟文献的审查,该文献说明了随着时间的推移,用于描述这些实体访问安排的语言存在广泛的多样性。这项研究的第二部分涉及对 98 个联盟的数据集的公开信息进行检查。这一分析进一步说明了基因组研究联盟所采用的访问安排的广泛多样性。共确定了 12 种不同的访问安排,包括四种简单形式(开放、联盟、管理和注册访问)和八种更复杂的分层形式(例如,联盟、管理和开放访问的组合)。大多数联盟都采用了某种形式的分层访问,通常遵循美国国立卫生研究院和英国惠康信托基金会等资助者的政策要求。要准确识别个别联盟的访问安排并不总是那么容易。更大的一致性、清晰度和透明度可能对捐赠者、存放者和访问者都有好处。需要做更多的工作来实现这一目标。