• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Data access arrangements in genomic research consortia.基因组研究联盟的数据访问安排。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 17;14(1):21685. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-72653-z.
2
From the principles of genomic data sharing to the practices of data access committees.从基因组数据共享的原则到数据访问委员会的实践。
EMBO Mol Med. 2015 May;7(5):507-9. doi: 10.15252/emmm.201405002.
3
Noncommercial US Funders' Policies on Trial Registration, Access to Summary Results, and Individual Patient Data Availability.非商业性美国资助者的试验注册、摘要结果获取和个体患者数据可及性政策。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jan 4;2(1):e187498. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.7498.
4
Balancing the local and the universal in maintaining ethical access to a genomics biobank.在维持对基因组生物样本库的伦理获取方面平衡地方与普遍因素。
BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Dec 28;18(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0240-7.
5
Data sharing in large research consortia: experiences and recommendations from ENGAGE.大型研究联盟中的数据共享:ENGAGE 的经验与建议。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2014 Mar;22(3):317-21. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2013.131. Epub 2013 Jun 19.
6
The Bermuda Triangle: The Pragmatics, Policies, and Principles for Data Sharing in the History of the Human Genome Project.百慕大三角:人类基因组计划历史中数据共享的语用学、政策与原则
J Hist Biol. 2018 Dec;51(4):693-805. doi: 10.1007/s10739-018-9538-7.
7
A human rights approach to an international code of conduct for genomic and clinical data sharing.一种基于人权视角的基因组和临床数据共享国际行为准则。
Hum Genet. 2014 Jul;133(7):895-903. doi: 10.1007/s00439-014-1432-6. Epub 2014 Feb 27.
8
Demonstrating trustworthiness when collecting and sharing genomic data: public views across 22 countries.在收集和共享基因组数据时展示可信度:22 个国家的公众观点。
Genome Med. 2021 May 25;13(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s13073-021-00903-0.
9
Public attitudes towards genomic data sharing: results from a provincial online survey in Canada.公众对基因组数据共享的态度:加拿大某省在线调查结果
BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Oct 7;24(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00967-0.
10
Developing reproducible bioinformatics analysis workflows for heterogeneous computing environments to support African genomics.为异构计算环境开发可重现的生物信息学分析工作流程,以支持非洲基因组学。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2018 Nov 29;19(1):457. doi: 10.1186/s12859-018-2446-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Cancer genomics and bioinformatics in Latin American countries: applications, challenges, and perspectives.拉丁美洲国家的癌症基因组学与生物信息学:应用、挑战与前景
Front Oncol. 2025 Jul 9;15:1584178. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1584178. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Achieving Procedural Parity in Managing Access to Genomic and Related Health Data: A Global Survey of Data Access Committee Members.实现管理基因组和相关健康数据访问程序的平等:数据访问委员会成员的全球调查。
Biopreserv Biobank. 2024 Apr;22(2):123-129. doi: 10.1089/bio.2022.0205. Epub 2023 May 16.
2
International federation of genomic medicine databases using GA4GH standards.使用全球基因组与健康联盟(GA4GH)标准的国际基因组医学数据库联合会。
Cell Genom. 2021 Nov 10;1(2). doi: 10.1016/j.xgen.2021.100032.
3
GA4GH: International policies and standards for data sharing across genomic research and healthcare.全球基因组与健康联盟(GA4GH):跨基因组研究与医疗保健领域数据共享的国际政策与标准。
Cell Genom. 2021 Nov 10;1(2). doi: 10.1016/j.xgen.2021.100029.
4
Toward better governance of human genomic data.迈向人类基因组数据更好的治理。
Nat Genet. 2021 Jan;53(1):2-8. doi: 10.1038/s41588-020-00742-6.
5
Characterizing the Biomedical Data-Sharing Landscape.描述生物医学数据共享领域。
J Law Med Ethics. 2019 Mar;47(1):21-30. doi: 10.1177/1073110519840481.
6
Federated discovery and sharing of genomic data using Beacons.使用信标进行基因组数据的联合发现与共享。
Nat Biotechnol. 2019 Mar;37(3):220-224. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0046-x.
7
Integrating Genomics into Healthcare: A Global Responsibility.将基因组学融入医疗保健:全球的责任。
Am J Hum Genet. 2019 Jan 3;104(1):13-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.11.014.
8
Policies and strategies to facilitate secondary use of research data in the health sciences.促进健康科学研究数据二次利用的政策与策略。
Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Dec 1;46(6):1729-1733. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyx195.
9
Federation in genomics pipelines: techniques and challenges.基因组学管道中的联盟:技术与挑战。
Brief Bioinform. 2019 Jan 18;20(1):235-244. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbx102.
10
Sharing Data to Build a Medical Information Commons: From Bermuda to the Global Alliance.共享数据以构建医学信息共享库:从百慕大到全球联盟。
Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2017 Aug 31;18:389-415. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genom-083115-022515. Epub 2017 Apr 17.

基因组研究联盟的数据访问安排。

Data access arrangements in genomic research consortia.

机构信息

Centre for Law and Genetics, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.

Faculty of Business and Law, Australian Centre for Health Law Research, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 17;14(1):21685. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-72653-z.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-72653-z
PMID:39289472
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11408512/
Abstract

One of the most common terms that is used to describe entities responsible for sharing genomic data for research purposes is 'genomic research consortium'. However, there is a lack of clarity around the language used by consortia to describe their data sharing arrangements. Calls have been made for more uniform terminology. This article reports on a review of the genomic research consortium literature illustrating a wide diversity in the language that has been used over time to describe the access arrangements of these entities. The second component of this research involved an examination of publicly available information from a dataset of 98 consortia. This analysis further illustrates the wide diversity in the access arrangements adopted by genomic research consortia. A total of 12 different access arrangements were identified, including four simple forms (open, consortium, managed and registered access) and eight more complex tiered forms (for example, a combination of consortium, managed and open access). The majority of consortia utilised some form of tiered access, often following the policy requirements of funders like the US National Institutes of Health and the UK Wellcome Trust. It was not always easy to precisely identify the access arrangements of individual consortia. Greater consistency, clarity and transparency is likely to be of benefit to donors, depositors and accessors alike. More work needs to be done to achieve this end.

摘要

用于描述负责为研究目的共享基因组数据的实体的最常见术语之一是“基因组研究联盟”。然而,对于联盟用来描述其数据共享安排的语言,存在着缺乏明确性的问题。有人呼吁使用更统一的术语。本文报告了对基因组研究联盟文献的审查,该文献说明了随着时间的推移,用于描述这些实体访问安排的语言存在广泛的多样性。这项研究的第二部分涉及对 98 个联盟的数据集的公开信息进行检查。这一分析进一步说明了基因组研究联盟所采用的访问安排的广泛多样性。共确定了 12 种不同的访问安排,包括四种简单形式(开放、联盟、管理和注册访问)和八种更复杂的分层形式(例如,联盟、管理和开放访问的组合)。大多数联盟都采用了某种形式的分层访问,通常遵循美国国立卫生研究院和英国惠康信托基金会等资助者的政策要求。要准确识别个别联盟的访问安排并不总是那么容易。更大的一致性、清晰度和透明度可能对捐赠者、存放者和访问者都有好处。需要做更多的工作来实现这一目标。