Suppr超能文献

粪便微生物群移植治疗肠易激综合征的临床疗效和安全性:系统评价、荟萃分析和试验序贯分析。

Clinical efficacy and safety of faecal microbiota transplantation in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

机构信息

Education Centre, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, National Cheng Kung University, No.138, Sheng Li Road, Tainan, 704, Taiwan.

Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.

出版信息

Eur J Med Res. 2024 Sep 18;29(1):464. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-02046-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS).

METHODS

We searched four databases for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared FMT with a control intervention in patients with IBS. The revised Cochrane risk-of-bias (RoB) tool was chosen for appraisal. Meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis (TSA) was conducted. Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was used to assess the certainty of evidence (CoE).

RESULTS

We included 12 RCTs with a total of 615 participants. Meta-analyses showed no significant difference between the FMT and control groups in terms of clinical responses (relative risk [RR] = 1.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88-2.33) and changes in IBS Severity Scoring System (IBS-SSS) scores (standardised mean difference [SMD] =  - 0.31, 95% CI  - 0.72 to 0.09) and IBS Quality of Life (IBS-QOL) scores (SMD = 0.30, 95% CI  - 0.09 to 0.69). Subgroup analysis revealed that in studies with low RoB and using endoscopy, nasojejunal tube and rectal enema delivery, FMT led to a significant improvement in clinical responses and changes in IBS-SSS and IBS-QOL scores. TSA suggested that the current evidence is inconclusive and that the CoE is very low.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that patients with IBS may benefit from FMT especially when it is administered via endoscopy, nasojejunal tube or rectal enema. However, the certainty of evidence is very low. Further research is needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of FMT for IBS treatment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO registration number CRD42020211002.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估粪便微生物群移植(FMT)治疗肠易激综合征(IBS)的疗效和安全性。

方法

我们检索了四个数据库,以寻找比较 FMT 与 IBS 患者对照干预的随机对照试验(RCT)。选择修订后的 Cochrane 偏倚风险(RoB)工具进行评估。进行荟萃分析和试验序贯分析(TSA)。使用推荐评估、制定与评价(GRADE)方法学来评估证据确定性(CoE)。

结果

我们纳入了 12 项 RCT,共 615 名参与者。荟萃分析显示,FMT 组与对照组在临床反应(相对风险 [RR] = 1.44,95%置信区间 [CI] 0.88-2.33)和 IBS 严重程度评分系统(IBS-SSS)评分(标准化均数差 [SMD] = -0.31,95%CI -0.72 至 0.09)和 IBS 生活质量(IBS-QOL)评分(SMD = 0.30,95%CI -0.09 至 0.69)方面无显著差异。亚组分析显示,在 RoB 较低且使用内镜、鼻空肠管和直肠灌肠给药的研究中,FMT 可显著改善临床反应以及 IBS-SSS 和 IBS-QOL 评分的变化。TSA 提示,目前证据尚无定论,CoE 非常低。

结论

本研究表明,IBS 患者可能受益于 FMT,尤其是当通过内镜、鼻空肠管或直肠灌肠给药时。然而,证据的确定性非常低。需要进一步的研究来证实 FMT 治疗 IBS 的疗效和安全性。

试验注册

PROSPERO 注册号 CRD42020211002。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/666d/11409544/bdc4722d9a4e/40001_2024_2046_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验