Abdelghafar Yomna Ali, AbdelQadir Yossef Hassan, Motawea Karam R, Nasr Sara Amr, Omran Hoda Aly Mohamed, Belal Mohamed Mohamed, Elhashash Mohamed Mahdy, AbdelAzim Ahmed Alaa, Shah Jaffer
Faculty of Medicine Alexandria University Alexandria Egypt.
Faculty of Medicine Beni Suef University Beni Suef Egypt.
Health Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 12;5(5):e814. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.814. eCollection 2022 Sep.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Fecal microbiota transfer (FMT) is a potential treatment for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Several randomized trials have tested FMT effects using different routes of administration, doses, and sample sizes. We aim to assess the overall efficacy of FMT for IBS patients and the safety of the intervention. METHODS: We systematically searched four databases for randomized control trials that studied the efficacy and safety of FMT in IBS patients. RESULTS: We included 8 randomized trials (472 patients) that compared FMT with placebo in IBS patients. Pooled results showed no statistically significant difference between FMT and control groups in the overall change in IBS symptom severity (IBS-SSS) at 1 month ( = 0.94), 3/4 months ( = 0.82), and at the end of trials ( = 0.67). No significant difference in the total number of respondents between the FMT and control groups (risk ratios = 1.84, [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.82-2.65], = 0.19). Although the oral route of administration showed a significant difference in the number of respondents ( = 0.004), there was no statistically significant difference in the IBS-SSS when subgrouping the oral route of administration (mean difference = 47.57, [95% CI = -8.74-103.87], = 0.10). CONCLUSION: FMT is not an effective treatment to relieve all the symptoms of IBS. Even in the groups that showed relatively significant improvement after FMT, the effect was proven to wear off over time and the re-administration carries a low success rate. Future research should consider different bacterial-based interventions such as probiotics or specific antibiotics.
背景与目的:粪便微生物群移植(FMT)是肠易激综合征(IBS)的一种潜在治疗方法。多项随机试验使用不同的给药途径、剂量和样本量测试了FMT的效果。我们旨在评估FMT对IBS患者的总体疗效以及干预措施的安全性。 方法:我们系统检索了四个数据库,以查找研究FMT对IBS患者疗效和安全性的随机对照试验。 结果:我们纳入了8项随机试验(472例患者),这些试验比较了IBS患者中FMT与安慰剂的效果。汇总结果显示,在1个月(=0.94)、3/4个月(=0.82)和试验结束时(=0.67),FMT组与对照组在IBS症状严重程度总体变化(IBS-SSS)方面无统计学显著差异。FMT组与对照组的应答者总数无显著差异(风险比=1.84,[95%置信区间(CI)=0.82-2.65],=0.19)。尽管口服给药途径在应答者数量上显示出显著差异(=0.004),但对口服给药途径进行亚组分析时,IBS-SSS无统计学显著差异(平均差异=47.57,[95%CI=-8.74-103.87],=0.10)。 结论:FMT并非缓解IBS所有症状的有效治疗方法。即使在FMT后显示出相对显著改善的组中,效果也被证明会随着时间推移而消失,再次给药的成功率较低。未来的研究应考虑不同的基于细菌的干预措施,如益生菌或特定抗生素。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022
World J Gastroenterol. 2023-5-28
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2021-11
Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2024-8-2
Gastroenterology. 2023-6
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022
Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2021-9
Ther Adv Infect Dis. 2021-1-25
Gastroenterology. 2021-1
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020-7-20