Suppr超能文献

非达霉素在复发高风险患者中的真实世界疗效。

Real-world effectiveness of fidaxomicin in patients at high risk of recurrence.

作者信息

Colwell Benjamin, Aguilar Jennifer, Hughes Frances, Goriacko Pavel, Chen Victor, Chang Mei, Bartash Rachel, Guo Yi

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.

Department of Pharmacy, UC San Diego Health, San Diego, CA, USA.

出版信息

Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2024 Sep 11;4(1):e127. doi: 10.1017/ash.2024.381. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Compare the real-world impact of fidaxomicin (FDX) and vancomycin (VAN) on infection (CDI) recurrence in a high-risk patient population.

DESIGN

A retrospective, matched-cohort study evaluating hospitalized patients with CDI from January 1, 2016, to November 1, 2022, within a tertiary academic medical center.

PATIENTS

Adult patients with at least 1 prior CDI case who received either FDX or VAN for non-fulminant CDI while admitted, and had at least 1 additional risk factor for recurrence. Risk factors included age >70, solid organ or bone marrow transplant recipients, broad-spectrum antibiotic use within 30 days, or receipt of chemotherapy/immune-modulating agents within 30 days of admission. FDX and VAN patients were matched according to risk factors.

RESULTS

A total of 415 patient admissions were identified. After the exclusion of 92 patients for fulminant CDI, diarrhea from another cause, or use of VAN taper therapy, and 15 unmatched patients, 308 patient admissions were included (68 FDX and 240 VAN patients). There were no significant differences in 4-week recurrence (26% vs 23%; OR 1.1; = .51), 90-day CDI readmission (29% vs 23%; = .65), or 90-day all-cause readmission (54% vs 53%; = .91). There was a significant 17% decrease in 90-day mortality associated with the use of FDX (OR .3; = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

In a real-world high-risk patient population, the use of FDX compared to oral VAN did not result in decreased CDI recurrence within 4 weeks or fewer hospital readmissions within 90 days. Further research is needed to better assess the value of FDX in this patient population.

摘要

目的

比较非达霉素(FDX)和万古霉素(VAN)对高危患者群体艰难梭菌感染(CDI)复发的实际影响。

设计

一项回顾性配对队列研究,评估2016年1月1日至2022年11月1日在一家三级学术医疗中心住院的CDI患者。

患者

成年患者,既往至少有1例CDI病例,住院期间因非暴发性CDI接受FDX或VAN治疗,且至少有1个复发的额外危险因素。危险因素包括年龄>70岁、实体器官或骨髓移植受者、30天内使用广谱抗生素,或入院后30天内接受化疗/免疫调节剂治疗。FDX组和VAN组患者根据危险因素进行配对。

结果

共确定415例患者入院。排除92例暴发性CDI、其他原因引起的腹泻或使用VAN递减疗法的患者,以及15例未配对患者后,纳入308例患者入院病例(68例FDX组患者和240例VAN组患者)。4周复发率(26%对23%;OR 1.1;P = 0.51)、90天CDI再入院率(29%对23%;P = 0.65)或90天全因再入院率(54%对53%;P = 0.91)无显著差异。使用FDX可使90天死亡率显著降低17%(OR 0.3;P = 0.04)。

结论

在实际的高危患者群体中,与口服VAN相比,使用FDX并未导致4周内CDI复发率降低或90天内住院再入院次数减少。需要进一步研究以更好地评估FDX在该患者群体中的价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d175/11406562/0e777b8791fd/S2732494X24003814_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验