• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于真实世界经验,非达霉素与口服万古霉素治疗复发高风险患者感染的比较。

Fidaxomicin versus oral vancomycin for infection among patients at high risk for recurrence based on real-world experience.

作者信息

Pettit Natasha N, Lew Alison K, Nguyen Cynthia T, Bell Elizabeth, Lehmann Christopher J, Pisano Jennifer

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.

Department of Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases and Global Health, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2024 Oct 4;45(11):1-7. doi: 10.1017/ice.2024.145.

DOI:10.1017/ice.2024.145
PMID:39363592
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11663469/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

infection (CDI) is a common nosocomial infection and is associated with a high healthcare burden due to high rates of recurrence. In 2021 the IDSA/SHEA guideline update recommended fidaxomicin (FDX) as first-line therapy. Our medical center updated our institutional guidelines to follow these recommendations, prioritizing FDX use among patients at high risk for recurrent CDI (rCDI).

METHODS

This pre- post- quasi-experimental study included patients with a presumptive diagnosis of CDI at risk for recurrence (age >/= 65 years, immunocompromised, severe CDI) that received vancomycin (VAN) or FDX between October 2019 to October 2022. Patients who received bezlotoxumab, had fulminant CDI, or received <10 days of the same antibiotic for their full treatment course were excluded. Patients were evaluated for rCDI within 8 weeks of completion of therapy, subsequent episodes of CDI within 12 months, and CDI-related admissions within 30 days.

RESULTS

Of 397 CDI regimens evaluated, 196 received VAN and 201 received FDX. Rates of rCDI (9.2% vs 10%, = 0.86), subsequent CDI within 12 months of therapy completion of therapy (19.4% vs 26%, = 0.12) and 30-day CDI-related readmissions (3% vs 4.5%, = 0.6) were similar between patients who received VAN versus FDX.

CONCLUSION

Outcomes were similar between patients treated with FDX and VAN for the treatment of CDI among those at high risk for rCDI, using our outlined criteria. Although we observed a trend toward lower rates of rCDI among immunocompromised patients, this finding was not significant. Further investigation is needed to determine which patients with CDI may benefit from FDX.

摘要

引言

艰难梭菌感染(CDI)是一种常见的医院感染,由于复发率高,其医疗负担也很高。2021年,美国感染病学会(IDSA)/美国医疗保健流行病学学会(SHEA)指南更新推荐非达霉素(FDX)作为一线治疗药物。我们的医疗中心更新了机构指南以遵循这些建议,优先在复发性CDI(rCDI)高危患者中使用FDX。

方法

这项前后对照的准实验研究纳入了2019年10月至2022年10月期间接受万古霉素(VAN)或FDX治疗、有复发风险的疑似CDI患者(年龄≥65岁、免疫功能低下、严重CDI)。接受贝佐妥单抗治疗、暴发性CDI或整个治疗疗程使用同一种抗生素少于10天的患者被排除。在治疗完成后8周内评估患者的rCDI情况,治疗完成后12个月内评估后续CDI发作情况,30天内评估与CDI相关的住院情况。

结果

在评估的397种CDI治疗方案中,196例接受了VAN治疗,201例接受了FDX治疗。接受VAN治疗与接受FDX治疗的患者之间,rCDI发生率(9.2%对10%,P = 0.86)、治疗完成后12个月内的后续CDI发生率(19.4%对26%,P = 0.12)以及30天内与CDI相关的再入院率(3%对4.5%,P = 0.6)相似。

结论

根据我们制定的标准,在rCDI高危患者中,使用FDX和VAN治疗CDI的患者结局相似。虽然我们观察到免疫功能低下患者的rCDI发生率有降低趋势,但这一发现并不显著。需要进一步研究以确定哪些CDI患者可能从FDX治疗中获益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f10/11663469/579c825fb2b3/S0899823X24001454_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f10/11663469/579c825fb2b3/S0899823X24001454_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f10/11663469/579c825fb2b3/S0899823X24001454_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Fidaxomicin versus oral vancomycin for infection among patients at high risk for recurrence based on real-world experience.基于真实世界经验,非达霉素与口服万古霉素治疗复发高风险患者感染的比较。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2024 Oct 4;45(11):1-7. doi: 10.1017/ice.2024.145.
2
Real-world effectiveness of fidaxomicin in patients at high risk of recurrence.非达霉素在复发高风险患者中的真实世界疗效。
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2024 Sep 11;4(1):e127. doi: 10.1017/ash.2024.381. eCollection 2024.
3
Evaluating Bezlotoxumab-Fidaxomicin Combination Therapy in Clostridioides Infection: A Single-Center Retrospective Study from Aichi Prefecture, Japan.评估贝佐妥昔单抗-非达霉素联合疗法治疗艰难梭菌感染:来自日本爱知县的一项单中心回顾性研究。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2025 Feb 24;14(3):228. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics14030228.
4
Efficacy of Bezlotoxumab in Participants Receiving Metronidazole, Vancomycin, or Fidaxomicin for Treatment of () Infection.贝佐妥昔单抗在接受甲硝唑、万古霉素或非达霉素治疗()感染的参与者中的疗效。
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020 Jun 2;7(6):ofaa157. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa157. eCollection 2020 Jun.
5
Oral fidaxomicin versus vancomycin for the treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.口服 fidaxomicin 与万古霉素治疗艰难梭菌感染:系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Infect Chemother. 2022 Nov;28(11):1536-1545. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2022.08.008. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
6
The management of infection: from empirism to evidence.感染的管理:从经验主义到循证医学
Med Pharm Rep. 2024 Jan;97(1):5-11. doi: 10.15386/mpr-2622. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
7
Fidaxomicin versus metronidazole, vancomycin and their combination for initial episode, first recurrence and severe Clostridioides difficile infection - An observational cohort study. fidaxomicin 与甲硝唑、万古霉素及其联合治疗首发、首次复发和严重艰难梭菌感染的疗效比较:一项观察性队列研究。
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Feb;103:226-233. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.11.004. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
8
Partial Courses of Fidaxomicin Followed by Oral Vancomycin and the Effect on Recurrence of Infections.非达霉素部分疗程后序贯口服万古霉素及其对感染复发的影响
Ann Pharmacother. 2025 May 6:10600280251332946. doi: 10.1177/10600280251332946.
9
Defining optimal treatment for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (OpTION study): A randomized, double-blind comparison of three antibiotic regimens for patients with a first or second recurrence.定义复发性艰难梭菌感染的最佳治疗方法(OpTION 研究):首次或第二次复发患者的三种抗生素方案的随机、双盲比较。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 May;116:106756. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106756. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
10
A Retrospective Assessment of Guideline Adherence and Treatment Outcomes From Infection Following the IDSA 2021 Clinical Guideline Update: Infection.对遵循美国感染病学会(IDSA)2021年临床指南更新中感染相关内容的指南依从性和治疗结果的回顾性评估:感染
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024 Sep 30;11(10):ofae524. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofae524. eCollection 2024 Oct.

引用本文的文献

1
Trends and Efficacy in Clostridioides difficile Infection Management at a Polish Clinical Hospital.波兰一家临床医院艰难梭菌感染管理的趋势与疗效
Med Sci Monit. 2025 Aug 7;31:e948254. doi: 10.12659/MSM.948254.
2
Evaluating Bezlotoxumab-Fidaxomicin Combination Therapy in Clostridioides Infection: A Single-Center Retrospective Study from Aichi Prefecture, Japan.评估贝佐妥昔单抗-非达霉素联合疗法治疗艰难梭菌感染:来自日本爱知县的一项单中心回顾性研究。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2025 Feb 24;14(3):228. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics14030228.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative Effectiveness of Fidaxomicin vs Vancomycin in Populations With Immunocompromising Conditions for the Treatment of Infection: A Single-Center Study.非达霉素与万古霉素在免疫功能低下人群中治疗感染的疗效比较:一项单中心研究
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023 Dec 8;11(1):ofad622. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofad622. eCollection 2024 Jan.
2
An Open-Label, Randomized Trial Comparing Fidaxomicin With Oral Vancomycin for the Treatment of Clostridioides difficile Infection in Hospitalized Patients Receiving Concomitant Antibiotics for Concurrent Infections.一项开放性、随机临床试验比较 fidaxomicin 与口服万古霉素治疗同时接受抗生素治疗合并感染的住院患者的艰难梭菌感染。
Clin Infect Dis. 2024 Feb 17;78(2):277-282. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad606.
3
Insights into the Evolving Epidemiology of Infection and Treatment: A Global Perspective.《感染与治疗的演变流行病学洞察:全球视角》
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Jul 1;12(7):1141. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12071141.
4
Path of least recurrence: A systematic review and meta-analysis of fidaxomicin versus vancomycin for Clostridioides difficile infection.最小复发路径: fidaxomicin 与万古霉素治疗艰难梭菌感染的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pharmacotherapy. 2022 Nov;42(11):810-827. doi: 10.1002/phar.2734. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
5
Clinical Practice Guideline by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA): 2021 Focused Update Guidelines on Management of Clostridioides difficile Infection in Adults.美国传染病学会 (IDSA) 和美国医疗保健流行病学学会 (SHEA) 的临床实践指南:2021 年关于成人艰难梭菌感染管理的重点更新指南。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Sep 7;73(5):755-757. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab718.
6
ACG Clinical Guidelines: Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Clostridioides difficile Infections.ACG 临床指南:艰难梭菌感染的预防、诊断和治疗。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 Jun 1;116(6):1124-1147. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001278.
7
Extended-pulsed fidaxomicin versus vancomycin for Clostridium difficile infection: EXTEND study subgroup analyses.延长脉冲 fidaxomicin 与万古霉素治疗艰难梭菌感染:EXTEND 研究亚组分析。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019 Jun;38(6):1187-1194. doi: 10.1007/s10096-019-03525-y. Epub 2019 Mar 25.
8
Efficacy and safety of fidaxomicin for the treatment of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile infection in a randomized, double-blind, comparative Phase III study in Japan.在日本进行的一项随机、双盲、对照III期研究中,非达霉素治疗艰难梭菌感染的疗效和安全性。
J Infect Chemother. 2018 Sep;24(9):744-752. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2018.05.010. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
9
Extended-pulsed fidaxomicin versus vancomycin for Clostridium difficile infection in patients 60 years and older (EXTEND): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3b/4 trial.延长脉冲 fidaxomicin 与万古霉素治疗 60 岁及以上患者艰难梭菌感染(EXTEND):一项随机、对照、开放性标签、3b/4 期试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 Mar;18(3):296-307. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30751-X. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
10
Effect of Fidaxomicin versus Vancomycin on Susceptibility to Intestinal Colonization with Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci and Klebsiella pneumoniae in Mice.非达霉素与万古霉素对小鼠肠道被耐万古霉素肠球菌和肺炎克雷伯菌定植易感性的影响。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016 Jun 20;60(7):3988-93. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02590-15. Print 2016 Jul.