• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种新型风险评分有助于经导管主动脉瓣植入术中的股动脉穿刺:穿刺评分。

A Novel Risk Score Facilitates Femoral Artery Access in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Passage-Puncture Score.

作者信息

Chen Mi, Michel Jonathan, Stähli Barbara E, Templin Christian, Jakob Philipp, Gilhofer Thomas S, Tanner Felix C, Kasel Albert Markus

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, University Heart Center, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Struct Heart. 2024 Jun 25;8(5):100331. doi: 10.1016/j.shj.2024.100331. eCollection 2024 Sep.

DOI:10.1016/j.shj.2024.100331
PMID:39290681
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11403084/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Vascular complications remain high in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Careful evaluation of the femoral arteries is important to select the optimal access site.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to describe a novel risk score (the passage-puncture score) for transfemoral access using a single suture-based closure system.

METHODS

The passage-puncture score consists of the evaluation of 1) passage feasibility of the ilio-femoral arteries (passage score) and 2) puncture site feasibility (puncture score) based on pre-TAVI computed tomography. All patients underwent fluoroscopy-guided arterial puncture and closure with a suture-based closure system. The primary endpoint was the rate of vascular complications in discharge, including minor and major vascular complications according to the definitions of the Third Valve Academic Research Consortium.

RESULTS

From September 2020 to June 2021, transfemoral TAVI was performed in 98 of 99 patients. Passage score (right) was significantly higher in patients treated by left compared to those treated by right femoral access (3 vs. 1; <0.001). Puncture score was significantly different between patients undergoing mid-femoral as compared to nonmid-femoral puncture (0 vs. 3, <0.001). Minor vascular complications occurred in six (6%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The passage-puncture score is effective in defining the optimal access site for transfemoral TAVI. The systematic evaluation has the potential to further reduce access-site complications.

摘要

背景

经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)的血管并发症发生率仍然很高。仔细评估股动脉对于选择最佳入路部位很重要。

目的

本研究旨在描述一种使用基于单缝线的闭合系统进行经股动脉入路的新型风险评分(通过-穿刺评分)。

方法

通过-穿刺评分包括基于TAVI术前计算机断层扫描对1)髂股动脉的通过可行性(通过评分)和2)穿刺部位可行性(穿刺评分)进行评估。所有患者均在荧光透视引导下进行动脉穿刺,并使用基于缝线的闭合系统进行闭合。主要终点是出院时的血管并发症发生率,包括根据第三届瓣膜学术研究联盟的定义的轻微和严重血管并发症。

结果

2020年9月至2021年6月,99例患者中的98例进行了经股动脉TAVI。与右侧股动脉入路治疗的患者相比,左侧治疗的患者的通过评分(右侧)显著更高(3比1;<0.001)。股中部穿刺患者与非股中部穿刺患者的穿刺评分有显著差异(0比3,<0.001)。6例(6%)患者发生轻微血管并发症。

结论

通过-穿刺评分对于确定经股动脉TAVI的最佳入路部位有效。系统评估有可能进一步降低入路部位并发症。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/352f/11403084/02b3b03d5f13/gr8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/352f/11403084/733d27616368/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/352f/11403084/8faad5d26a67/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/352f/11403084/b73c24168723/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/352f/11403084/68288aecca1b/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/352f/11403084/f9f603bd1187/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/352f/11403084/61da2ee0605d/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/352f/11403084/746c9425b956/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/352f/11403084/704c3b89c40e/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/352f/11403084/02b3b03d5f13/gr8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/352f/11403084/733d27616368/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/352f/11403084/8faad5d26a67/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/352f/11403084/b73c24168723/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/352f/11403084/68288aecca1b/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/352f/11403084/f9f603bd1187/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/352f/11403084/61da2ee0605d/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/352f/11403084/746c9425b956/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/352f/11403084/704c3b89c40e/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/352f/11403084/02b3b03d5f13/gr8.jpg

相似文献

1
A Novel Risk Score Facilitates Femoral Artery Access in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Passage-Puncture Score.一种新型风险评分有助于经导管主动脉瓣植入术中的股动脉穿刺:穿刺评分。
Struct Heart. 2024 Jun 25;8(5):100331. doi: 10.1016/j.shj.2024.100331. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Impact of femoral artery puncture using digital subtraction angiography and road mapping on vascular and bleeding complications after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation.数字减影血管造影和路径图引导下股动脉穿刺对经股动脉导管主动脉瓣植入术后血管及出血并发症的影响
EuroIntervention. 2017 Jan 20;12(13):1667-1673. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-15-00412.
3
Impact of suture mediated femoral access site closure with the Prostar XL compared to the ProGlide system on outcome in transfemoral aortic valve implantation.与ProGlide系统相比,使用Prostar XL进行缝线介导的股动脉穿刺部位闭合对经股动脉主动脉瓣植入术结局的影响。
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Nov 15;223:564-567. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.08.193. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
4
Ultrasound-guided deployment of ProGlide™ device in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation and risk reduction of vascular complications: A propensity-matched cohort study.超声引导 ProGlideTM 装置在经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣植入术中的应用及血管并发症风险降低:一项倾向匹配队列研究。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Apr;103(5):771-781. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30999. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
5
Comparison of a Pure Plug-Based Versus a Primary Suture-Based Vascular Closure Device Strategy for Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: The CHOICE-CLOSURE Randomized Clinical Trial.经股动脉主动脉瓣置换术中纯封堵器与主缝合法血管闭合装置策略的比较:CHOICE-CLOSURE 随机临床试验。
Circulation. 2022 Jan 18;145(3):170-183. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.057856. Epub 2021 Nov 5.
6
Femoral Arterial Calcification and Plug- vs. Suture-Based Closure Device Strategies Post-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Insights From CHOICE-CLOSURE.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后股动脉钙化及基于封堵器与缝合器的闭合装置策略:来自CHOICE-CLOSURE研究的见解
Struct Heart. 2023 Dec 7;8(2):100236. doi: 10.1016/j.shj.2023.100236. eCollection 2024 Mar.
7
The role of external iliac artery diameter indexed to BSA score in predicting vascular access complications after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation.以体表面积评分校正的髂外动脉直径在预测经股动脉导管主动脉瓣植入术后血管通路并发症中的作用。
Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2024 Mar;20(1):76-83. doi: 10.5114/aic.2024.136407. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
8
Percutaneous plug-based vascular closure device in 1000 consecutive transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantations.在连续1000例经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣植入术中使用基于封堵器的经皮血管闭合装置。
Int J Cardiol. 2022 Jul 15;359:7-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.04.033. Epub 2022 Apr 12.
9
Angiographic Analysis of Vascular Integrity After Percutaneous Closure Using Prostar XL Device During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术中使用Prostar XL装置经皮闭合后血管完整性的血管造影分析
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2017 Jul;51(5):282-287. doi: 10.1177/1538574417705285. Epub 2017 May 5.
10
Minimalistic Approach for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI): Open Vascular Vs. Fully Percutaneous Approach.经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)的极简方法:开放血管法与完全经皮法
Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki). 2019 Oct 1;40(2):5-14. doi: 10.2478/prilozi-2019-0009.

引用本文的文献

1
Complex Transfemoral Access During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Narrative Review of Management, Complexity Scores, and Alternative Access.经导管主动脉瓣置换术中的复杂经股动脉入路:管理、复杂性评分及替代入路的叙述性综述
Life (Basel). 2025 May 19;15(5):810. doi: 10.3390/life15050810.

本文引用的文献

1
Ultrasound- Versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Strategy for Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Access: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.超声引导与透视引导经股动脉入路行经导管主动脉瓣置换术的策略比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Oct;14(10):e010742. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.121.010742. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
2
Valve Academic Research Consortium 3: updated endpoint definitions for aortic valve clinical research.瓣膜学术研究联合会 3 期:主动脉瓣临床研究更新的终点定义。
Eur Heart J. 2021 May 14;42(19):1825-1857. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa799.
3
Standardized Measurement of Femoral Artery Depth by Computed Tomography to Predict Vascular Complications After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.
通过计算机断层扫描对股动脉深度进行标准化测量以预测经导管主动脉瓣植入术后的血管并发症。
Am J Cardiol. 2021 Apr 15;145:119-127. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.12.089. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
4
Suture- or Plug-Based Large-Bore Arteriotomy Closure: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.缝线或塞子式大口径动脉切开术闭合:一项先导随机对照试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jan 25;14(2):149-157. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.09.052. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
5
A Novel Iliac Morphology Score Predicts Procedural Mortality and Major Vascular Complications in Transfemoral Aortic Valve Replacement.一种新型髂部形态学评分可预测经股动脉主动脉瓣置换术的手术死亡率和主要血管并发症。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2018 Jan;46:208-217. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2017.06.137. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
6
Trends in Vascular Complications in High-Risk Patients Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in the United States.
Am J Cardiol. 2017 May 1;119(9):1433-1437. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.01.028. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
7
Comparison of vascular closure devices for access site closure after transfemoral aortic valve implantation.经股主动脉瓣置换术后血管入路封堵器比较。
Eur Heart J. 2015 Dec 14;36(47):3370-9. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv417. Epub 2015 Aug 26.
8
Endograft limb occlusion in EVAR: iliac tortuosity quantified by three different indices on the basis of preoperative CTA.覆膜支架分支闭塞在腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术中:基于术前 CTA 采用三种不同指数定量评估髂动脉迂曲。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014 Nov;48(5):527-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.04.018. Epub 2014 May 28.
9
Transfemoral aortic valve implantation new criteria to predict vascular complications.经股主动脉瓣植入术预测血管并发症的新标准。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Aug;4(8):851-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.03.019.
10
Real-time ultrasound guidance facilitates femoral arterial access and reduces vascular complications: FAUST (Femoral Arterial Access With Ultrasound Trial).实时超声引导有助于股动脉入路并减少血管并发症:FAUST(超声引导股动脉入路试验)。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Jul;3(7):751-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.04.015.