Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2024 Oct;30(8):728-737. doi: 10.1017/S1355617724000365. Epub 2024 Sep 18.
This study investigated the relationship between various intrapersonal factors and the discrepancy between subjective and objective cognitive difficulties in adults with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The first aim was to examine these associations in patients with valid cognitive symptom reporting. The next aim was to investigate the same associations in patients with invalid scores on tests of cognitive symptom overreporting.
The sample comprised 154 adults who underwent a neuropsychological evaluation for ADHD. Patients were divided into groups based on whether they had valid cognitive symptom reporting and valid test performance ( = 117) or invalid cognitive symptom overreporting but valid test performance ( = 37). Scores from multiple symptom and performance validity tests were used to group patients. Using patients' scores from a cognitive concerns self-report measure and composite index of objective performance tests, we created a subjective-objective discrepancy index to quantify the extent of cognitive concerns that exceeded difficulties on objective testing. Various measures were used to assess intrapersonal factors thought to influence the subjective-objective cognitive discrepancy, including demographics, estimated premorbid intellectual ability, internalizing symptoms, somatic symptoms, and perceived social support.
Patients reported greater cognitive difficulties on subjective measures than observed on objective testing. The discrepancy between subjective and objective scores was most strongly associated with internalizing and somatic symptoms. These associations were observed in both validity groups.
Subjective cognitive concerns may be more indicative of the extent of internalizing and somatic symptoms than actual cognitive impairment in adults with ADHD, regardless if they have valid scores on cognitive symptom overreporting tests.
本研究旨在探讨个体内部因素与注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)成人主观认知困难与客观认知困难之间差异的关系。第一个目的是在具有有效认知症状报告的患者中检验这些关联。下一个目的是在具有认知症状过度报告测试无效得分的患者中调查相同的关联。
样本包括 154 名接受 ADHD 神经心理评估的成年人。根据他们是否具有有效认知症状报告和有效测试表现(n = 117)或无效认知症状过度报告但有效测试表现(n = 37),将患者分为两组。使用来自多种症状和表现效度测试的分数对患者进行分组。使用患者来自认知关注自我报告量表和客观绩效测试综合指数的分数,我们创建了一个主观-客观差异指数,以量化超出客观测试难度的认知关注程度。使用各种措施评估被认为会影响主观-客观认知差异的个体内部因素,包括人口统计学特征、估计的前期智力能力、内化症状、躯体症状和感知社会支持。
患者报告的主观测量认知困难比客观测试观察到的更严重。主观和客观分数之间的差异与内化和躯体症状密切相关。这些关联在两个有效性组中均有观察到。
在 ADHD 成人中,主观认知关注可能比实际认知障碍更能反映内化和躯体症状的程度,无论他们是否在认知症状过度报告测试中具有有效得分。