Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Clin Neuropsychol. 2024 Apr;38(3):644-667. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2023.2241190. Epub 2023 Jul 30.
This study investigated the relationship between perceived cognitive impairment, objective cognitive performance, and intrapersonal variables thought to influence ratings of perceived cognitive impairment. Study sample comprised 194 nongeriatric adults who were seen in a general outpatient neuropsychology clinic for a variety of referral questions. The cognition subscale score from the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule served as the measure of perceived cognitive impairment. Objective cognitive performance was indexed a composite score derived from a comprehensive neuropsychological battery. Internalizing psychopathology was indexed a composite score derived from anxiety and depression measures. Medical and neuropsychiatric comorbidities were indexed by the number of different ICD diagnostic categories documented in medical records. Demographics included age, sex, race, and years of education. Objective cognitive performance was unrelated to subjective concerns, explaining <1% of the variance in perceived cognitive impairment ratings. Conversely, internalizing psychopathology was significantly predictive, explaining nearly one-third of the variance in perceived cognitive impairment ratings, even after accounting for test performance, demographics, and number of comorbidities. Internalizing psychopathology was also highly associated with a greater discrepancy between scores on perceived and objective cognitive measures among participants with greater cognitive concerns. Clinically significant somatic symptoms uniquely contributed to the explained variance in perceived cognitive impairment (by ∼13%) when analyzed in a model with internalizing symptoms. These findings suggest that perceived cognitive impairment may be more indicative of the extent of internalizing psychopathology and somatic concerns than cognitive ability.
本研究调查了知觉认知障碍、客观认知表现以及被认为影响知觉认知障碍评估的个体内变量之间的关系。研究样本包括 194 名非老年成年人,他们因各种转诊问题在综合门诊神经心理学诊所就诊。知觉认知障碍的评估采用世界卫生组织残疾评估量表中的认知子量表评分。客观认知表现则以综合神经心理学测试中的综合得分来表示。内在心理病理学则通过焦虑和抑郁测量中的综合得分来表示。医疗和神经精神共病则通过医疗记录中记录的不同 ICD 诊断类别数量来表示。人口统计学特征包括年龄、性别、种族和受教育年限。客观认知表现与主观问题无关,仅能解释知觉认知障碍评估得分差异的<1%。相反,内在心理病理学具有显著的预测作用,可解释知觉认知障碍评估得分差异的近三分之一,即使考虑到测试表现、人口统计学特征和共病数量也是如此。内在心理病理学也与具有更大认知问题的参与者知觉和客观认知测量之间的差异高度相关。在分析包含内在症状的模型中,临床显著的躯体症状对知觉认知障碍评估的解释方差有独特的贡献(约 13%)。这些发现表明,知觉认知障碍可能更能反映内在心理病理学和躯体问题的严重程度,而不是认知能力。