Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York.
Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2433145. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.33145.
Utilization of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for hematologic cancers previously demonstrated race, ethnicity, and age-based disparities.
To evaluate utilization over time by race, ethnicity, and age to determine if disparities persist in light of recent significant increases in HCT volume.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This US population-based retrospective cohort study includes patients who received transplants from January 2009 to December 2018. Data collection and cleaning occurred from February 2019 to November 2021, and data analysis occurred from January 2022 to October 2023. Method 1 restricted the analysis to Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) reporting areas for cases and transplants. Method 2 applied SEER age-, race-, and ethnicity-specific incidence rates to corresponding US census population and included all transplants reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research. Race and ethnicity groups were hierarchically defined as Hispanic (any race), non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, and non-Hispanic Other (Asian and American Indian).
Receipt of HCT.
Utilization rate of autologous or allogeneic HCT for patients with hematologic cancers by age, race, and ethnicity.
From 2009 to 2018, 136 280 HCTs were analyzed for 6 hematologic cancers comprising 16.7% pediatric/adolescent/young adults (0-39 years), 83.3% adults (40-84 years), 58% male, 10.3% Hispanic, 11.4% non-Hispanic Black, 3.8% non-Hispanic Other, and 74.5% non-Hispanic White patients, with 49 385 allogeneic and 86 895 autologous HCTs performed. HCT utilization increased over time for all disease, age, race, and ethnic groups. From 2017 to 2018, adult (40-84 years) allogeneic transplant utilization for acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) was similar for Hispanic and non-Hispanic White or Other patients but was lower for non-Hispanic Black patients (acute myeloid leukemia: 19% vs 13%; MDS: 9%-10% vs 5%). Similarly, autologous transplant utilization for lymphoma was similar for all race and ethnicity groups; however, autologous transplant for multiple myeloma was highest for non-Hispanic White patients and lower for all other groups (31% vs 26%-27%). In patients aged 0 to 39 years, utilization of allogeneic transplant for acute lymphoblastic leukemia was highest in Hispanic patients, followed by non-Hispanic White, Black, and Other races (acute lymphoblastic leukemia: 19%, 18%, 17%, and 16%, respectively).
In this cohort study of autologous and allogeneic transplant utilization for hematologic cancers, disparities persisted for non-Hispanic Black patients. Hispanic, non-Hispanic Other, and younger age groups had increased utilization over time that was on par with non-Hispanic White patients in the most recent cohort.
造血细胞移植(HCT)在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用以前存在种族、民族和年龄差异。
评估不同种族、民族和年龄的利用情况随时间的变化,以确定在 HCT 数量最近显著增加的情况下,这些差异是否仍然存在。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项在美国进行的基于人群的回顾性队列研究,纳入了 2009 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月期间接受移植的患者。数据收集和清理于 2019 年 2 月至 2021 年 11 月进行,数据分析于 2022 年 1 月至 2023 年 10 月进行。方法 1 将分析仅限于病例和移植的监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)报告区域。方法 2 将 SEER 年龄、种族和民族特定的发病率应用于相应的美国人口普查,并包括向国际血液和骨髓移植研究中心报告的所有移植。种族和民族群体按层次定义为西班牙裔(任何种族)、非西班牙裔白人、非西班牙裔黑人以及非西班牙裔其他人(亚洲人和美洲印第安人)。
接受 HCT。
根据年龄、种族和民族,分析血液系统恶性肿瘤患者接受自体或同种异体 HCT 的利用情况。
2009 年至 2018 年期间,分析了 136280 例血液系统恶性肿瘤患者的 HCT,包括 16.7%的儿科/青少年/年轻成人(0-39 岁)、83.3%的成人(40-84 岁)、58%的男性、10.3%的西班牙裔、11.4%的非西班牙裔黑人、3.8%的非西班牙裔其他人以及 74.5%的非西班牙裔白人患者,其中 49385 例接受了同种异体 HCT,86895 例接受了自体 HCT。所有疾病、年龄、种族和民族群体的 HCT 利用都随着时间的推移而增加。2017 年至 2018 年,急性髓系白血病和骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)的成人(40-84 岁)同种异体移植的利用在西班牙裔和非西班牙裔白人或其他人中相似,但在非西班牙裔黑人中较低(急性髓系白血病:19%比 13%;MDS:9%-10%比 5%)。同样,淋巴瘤的自体移植利用在所有种族和民族群体中相似;然而,多发性骨髓瘤的自体移植在非西班牙裔白种人中最高,在所有其他群体中较低(31%比 26%-27%)。在 0 至 39 岁的患者中,急性淋巴细胞白血病的同种异体移植在西班牙裔患者中最高,其次是非西班牙裔白人、黑人以及其他种族(急性淋巴细胞白血病:19%、18%、17%和 16%)。
在这项关于血液系统恶性肿瘤自体和同种异体移植利用的队列研究中,非西班牙裔黑人患者的差异仍然存在。西班牙裔、非西班牙裔其他人以及年龄较小的群体随着时间的推移,利用情况有所增加,在最近的队列中,他们与非西班牙裔白人患者的利用情况相当。