• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

建议在报告中介分析结果时使用标准化或非标准化方法?

Suggested guidelines in reporting results from mediation analysis, standardized or unstandardized?

机构信息

Division of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Sep 18;19(9):e0310429. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310429. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0310429
PMID:39292656
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11410225/
Abstract

Mediation analysis is commonly implemented in psychological, epidemiological, and social behavior studies to identify potential factors that mediate associations between exposures and physical or psychological outcomes. Various analytical tools are available to perform mediation analyses, among which Mplus is widely used due to its user-friendly interface. In practice, sumptuous results provided by Mplus, such as the estimated standardized and unstandardized effect sizes, can be difficult for researchers to choose to match their studies. Through a comprehensive review and utilizing findings from a proven study, we proposed guidelines and recommendations to help users select between standardized or unstandardized results based on data attributes and users' hypotheses. We also provided guidelines to choose from several types of standardized values based on the types of variables, including exposures, mediators, and outcomes.

摘要

中介分析通常在心理学、流行病学和社会行为研究中实施,以确定暴露与身体或心理结果之间关联的潜在因素。有各种分析工具可用于进行中介分析,其中 Mplus 由于其用户友好的界面而被广泛使用。在实践中,Mplus 提供的丰富结果,例如估计的标准化和非标准化效应大小,可能使研究人员难以选择与他们的研究相匹配的结果。通过全面审查并利用经过验证的研究结果,我们提出了指南和建议,以帮助用户根据数据属性和用户假设在标准化或非标准化结果之间进行选择。我们还根据变量类型(包括暴露、中介和结果)提供了从几种标准化值中进行选择的指南。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a8f/11410225/1de9fc5db916/pone.0310429.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a8f/11410225/16c1a960cfeb/pone.0310429.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a8f/11410225/1de9fc5db916/pone.0310429.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a8f/11410225/16c1a960cfeb/pone.0310429.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a8f/11410225/1de9fc5db916/pone.0310429.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Suggested guidelines in reporting results from mediation analysis, standardized or unstandardized?建议在报告中介分析结果时使用标准化或非标准化方法?
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 18;19(9):e0310429. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310429. eCollection 2024.
2
A Guideline for Reporting Mediation Analyses of Randomized Trials and Observational Studies: The AGReMA Statement.随机试验和观察性研究中介分析报告的指南:AGReMA 声明。
JAMA. 2021 Sep 21;326(11):1045-1056. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.14075.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Development of A Guideline for Reporting Mediation Analyses (AGReMA).制定中介分析报告指南(AGReMA)。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Feb 3;20(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-0915-5.
6
The conduct and reporting of mediation analysis in recently published randomized controlled trials: results from a methodological systematic review.近期发表的随机对照试验中调解分析的实施和报告:方法学系统评价的结果。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Jan;117:78-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.10.001. Epub 2019 Oct 5.
7
Standardized or simple effect size: what should be reported?标准化效应量还是简单效应量:应该报告什么?
Br J Psychol. 2009 Aug;100(Pt 3):603-17. doi: 10.1348/000712608X377117. Epub 2008 Nov 17.
8
Adherence to a standardized protocol for measuring grip strength and appropriate cut-off values in adults over 65 years with sarcopenia: a systematic review protocol.65岁以上患有肌肉减少症的成年人握力测量的标准化方案及适当临界值:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):50-9. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2256.
9
A Systematic Review of the Reporting Quality of Observational Studies That Use Mediation Analyses.采用中介分析的观察性研究报告质量的系统评价
Prev Sci. 2022 Aug;23(6):1041-1052. doi: 10.1007/s11121-022-01349-5. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
10
The 2001 STRICTA recommendations for reporting acupuncture research: a review with implications for improving controlled clinical trial design.2001 年 STRICTA 推荐报告针灸研究的建议:对改进对照临床试验设计的影响的综述。
J Altern Complement Med. 2009 Feb;15(2):147-51. doi: 10.1089/acm.2008.0141.

本文引用的文献

1
Mediation analysis for common binary outcomes.中介分析常见二分类结局。
Stat Med. 2019 Feb 20;38(4):512-529. doi: 10.1002/sim.7945. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
2
Cohort Profile: The Isle Of Wight Whole Population Birth Cohort (IOWBC).队列简介:怀特岛全人群出生队列(IOWBC)。
Int J Epidemiol. 2018 Aug 1;47(4):1043-1044i. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyy023.
3
Addressing Moderated Mediation Hypotheses: Theory, Methods, and Prescriptions.调节中介假设的处理:理论、方法与建议。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2007 Jan-Mar;42(1):185-227. doi: 10.1080/00273170701341316.
4
Should researchers use single indicators, best indicators, or multiple indicators in structural equation models?研究人员应该在结构方程模型中使用单一指标、最佳指标还是多个指标?
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Oct 22;12:159. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-159.
5
Comparing standardized coefficients in structural equation modeling: a model reparameterization approach.结构方程建模中标准化系数的比较:模型重参数化方法。
Behav Res Methods. 2011 Sep;43(3):730-45. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0088-6.
6
Odds ratios for mediation analysis for a dichotomous outcome.二分类结局中介分析的优势比。
Am J Epidemiol. 2010 Dec 15;172(12):1339-48. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq332. Epub 2010 Oct 29.
7
Confidence Limits for the Indirect Effect: Distribution of the Product and Resampling Methods.间接效应的置信区间:乘积分布与重抽样方法
Multivariate Behav Res. 2004 Jan 1;39(1):99. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4.
8
A Simulation Study of Mediated Effect Measures.中介效应测量的模拟研究
Multivariate Behav Res. 1995 Jan 1;30(1):41. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr3001_3.
9
Comparison of methods for constructing confidence intervals of standardized indirect effects.标准化间接效应置信区间构建方法的比较
Behav Res Methods. 2009 May;41(2):425-38. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.2.425.
10
Standardized or simple effect size: what should be reported?标准化效应量还是简单效应量:应该报告什么?
Br J Psychol. 2009 Aug;100(Pt 3):603-17. doi: 10.1348/000712608X377117. Epub 2008 Nov 17.