• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠疫情后与组织的亲社会分享:帮助动机和时间视角的纵向检验

Prosocial sharing with organizations after the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal test of the role of motives for helping and time perspectives.

机构信息

Institute of Psychology, The Maria Grzegorzewska University, Institute of Psychology, Warsaw, Mazovia, Poland.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Sep 18;19(9):e0310511. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310511. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0310511
PMID:39292685
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11410197/
Abstract

The time after the COVID-19 pandemic posed a threat to engagement in prosocial behaviors within charity organizations. In the current study, we intended to test how three motivational paths: affective empathy-based, life satisfaction-based, and perceived social support-based shaped the change in intentions to give money and time to charity organizations over a yearly period (right after revocation of the most essential anti-COVID-19 laws and at the same time, outbreak of the war in Ukraine in 2022, in May 2022 and after a year, in late April-early May 2023). We also tested how past negative and present hedonistic time perspectives-namely, those most robust in predicting emotional states - shaped the changes in the abovementioned motivational paths and giving intentions. We conducted our longitudinal study on the general population of Poland (N = 566). We found that there has been a significant drop in the willingness to give time to organizations over the year after loosening the COVID-19 restrictions and the outbreak of war in Ukraine. We found that affective empathy helped sustain the intentions to give time to organizations, whereas past negative time perspective contributed to the decrease in such intentions. Our study suggests threats to organizations and highlights potential ways to encourage supporting them and caring for their volunteers' well-being.

摘要

新冠疫情大流行对慈善组织中亲社会行为的参与构成了威胁。在本研究中,我们旨在测试三种动机途径:基于情感同理心、基于生活满意度和基于感知社会支持,如何在一年内(即在取消最重要的反 COVID-19 法律之后,以及 2022 年乌克兰战争爆发之时、2023 年 4 月下旬至 5 月上旬)塑造向慈善组织捐款和捐时的意愿变化。我们还测试了过去的消极和现在的享乐主义时间观——即最能预测情绪状态的时间观——如何塑造上述动机途径和捐赠意愿的变化。我们在波兰的一般人群中进行了纵向研究(N=566)。我们发现,在 COVID-19 限制放松和乌克兰战争爆发后的一年里,人们向组织提供时间的意愿显著下降。我们发现情感同理心有助于维持向组织提供时间的意愿,而过去的消极时间观则导致这种意愿的下降。我们的研究表明了对组织的威胁,并强调了鼓励支持组织和关心其志愿者福祉的潜在途径。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfc6/11410197/bebae0ff6489/pone.0310511.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfc6/11410197/603c03b6196b/pone.0310511.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfc6/11410197/bebae0ff6489/pone.0310511.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfc6/11410197/603c03b6196b/pone.0310511.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfc6/11410197/bebae0ff6489/pone.0310511.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Prosocial sharing with organizations after the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal test of the role of motives for helping and time perspectives.新冠疫情后与组织的亲社会分享:帮助动机和时间视角的纵向检验
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 18;19(9):e0310511. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310511. eCollection 2024.
2
A daily diary study on adolescents' mood, empathy, and prosocial behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic.一项针对青少年在 COVID-19 大流行期间情绪、同理心和亲社会行为的日常日记研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 7;15(10):e0240349. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240349. eCollection 2020.
3
"I help because I want to, not because you tell me to": empathy increases autonomously motivated helping.“我帮忙是因为我想帮,而不是因为你叫我帮”:同理心会自动增加自主助人的动机。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2012 May;38(5):681-9. doi: 10.1177/0146167211435940. Epub 2012 Feb 9.
4
Public health and social measures to mitigate the health and economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in Turkey, Egypt, Ukraine, Kazakhstan, and Poland during 2020-2021: situational analysis.2020-2021 年期间,土耳其、埃及、乌克兰、哈萨克斯坦和波兰为减轻 COVID-19 大流行对健康和经济的影响而采取的公共卫生和社会措施:情况分析。
BMC Public Health. 2022 May 17;22(1):991. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13411-6.
5
Affective empathy predicts self-isolation behaviour acceptance during coronavirus risk exposure.情感共情预测在冠状病毒风险暴露期间的自我隔离行为接受度。
Sci Rep. 2021 May 12;11(1):10153. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89504-w.
6
Aging, Empathy, and Prosocial Behaviors During the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间的衰老、同理心和亲社会行为
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2022 Apr 1;77(4):e57-e63. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbab140.
7
The Link between Subjective Religiosity, Social Support, and Mental Health among Young Students in Eastern Europe during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study of Poland and Ukraine.新冠疫情期间东欧青年学生主观宗教信仰、社会支持与心理健康的关系:波兰和乌克兰的横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 26;19(11):6446. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116446.
8
The role of social connection on the experience of COVID-19 related post-traumatic growth and stress.社会联系在 COVID-19 相关创伤后成长和压力体验中的作用。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 15;16(12):e0261384. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261384. eCollection 2021.
9
Prosocial behavior predicts meaning in life during the COVID-19 pandemic: The longitudinal mediating role of perceived social support.亲社会行为可预测 COVID-19 大流行期间的生活意义:感知社会支持的纵向中介作用。
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 16;11:1115780. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1115780. eCollection 2023.
10
The burden of infectious diseases throughout and after the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2023) and Russo-Ukrainian war migration.COVID-19 大流行(2020-2023 年)及俄乌战争移民期间和之后的传染病负担。
J Med Virol. 2024 May;96(5):e29651. doi: 10.1002/jmv.29651.

本文引用的文献

1
People act when they feel obliged. Prosocial intentions toward Ukrainian refugees in Poland during the first two weeks of the war in Ukraine.人们在感到有义务时会采取行动。乌克兰战争头两周波兰民众对乌克兰难民的亲社会意图。
Curr Issues Personal Psychol. 2024 Jan 16;12(3):217-224. doi: 10.5114/cipp/177007. eCollection 2024.
2
Volunteering intentions during social crises: The role of considering the welfare of others and consequences of own behavior.社会危机期间的志愿服务意愿:考虑他人福利和自身行为后果的作用。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2024 Jun;246:104289. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104289. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
3
Positive impacts of perceived social support on prosocial behavior: the chain mediating role of moral identity and moral sensitivity.
感知到的社会支持对亲社会行为的积极影响:道德认同和道德敏感性的链式中介作用。
Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 16;14:1234977. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1234977. eCollection 2023.
4
Associations between adolescents' empathy and prosocial attributes before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.青少年在 COVID-19 大流行前后同理心与亲社会属性之间的关联。
BMC Pediatr. 2023 Apr 3;23(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s12887-023-03977-4.
5
Role of time perspectives and self-control on well-being and ill-being during the COVID-19 pandemic: A multiple mediation model.新冠疫情期间时间观念和自我控制对幸福和痛苦的作用:一个多重中介模型。
BMC Psychol. 2022 Oct 27;10(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-00933-2.
6
A multi-variable model for explaining long-term commitment to volunteering among COVID-19 volunteers.一个用于解释新冠疫情志愿者长期志愿服务投入情况的多变量模型。
Anal Soc Issues Public Policy. 2022 Jul 26. doi: 10.1111/asap.12322.
7
Tracking the nature and trajectory of social support in Facebook mutual aid groups during the COVID-19 pandemic.追踪新冠疫情期间脸书互助群组中社会支持的性质与轨迹。
Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2022 Jun 15;76:103043. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103043. Epub 2022 May 14.
8
Increased generosity under COVID-19 threat.在 COVID-19 威胁下增加慷慨度。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 31;12(1):4886. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08748-2.
9
To Help or Not to Help? Prosocial Behavior, Its Association With Well-Being, and Predictors of Prosocial Behavior During the Coronavirus Disease Pandemic.帮还是不帮?亲社会行为、其与幸福感的关联以及新冠疫情期间亲社会行为的预测因素
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 11;12:775032. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.775032. eCollection 2021.
10
Helping Others Helps Me: Prosocial Behavior and Satisfaction With Life During the COVID-19 Pandemic.帮助他人亦助己:新冠疫情期间的亲社会行为与生活满意度
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 27;13:762445. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.762445. eCollection 2022.