González-Martín Antonio, Rubio María Jesús, Heitz Florian, Depont Christensen René, Colombo Nicoletta, Van Gorp Toon, Romeo Margarita, Ray-Coquard Isabelle, Gaba Lydia, Leary Alexandra, De Sande Luis Miguel, Lebreton Coriolan, Redondo Andrés, Fabbro Michel, Barretina Ginesta Maria-Pilar, Follana Philippe, Pérez-Fidalgo J Alejandro, Rodrigues Manuel, Santaballa Ana, Sabatier Renaud, Bermejo-Pérez Maria José, Lotz Jean-Pierre, Pardo Beatriz, Marquina Gloria, Sánchez-Lorenzo Luisa, Quindós María, Estévez-García Purificación, Guerra Alía Eva, Manso Luis, Casado Victoria, Kommoss Stefan, Tognon Germana, Henry Stéphanie, Bruchim Ilan, Oaknin Ana, Selle Frédéric
Medical Oncology Department, Translational Oncology Group, CIMA, Universidad de Navarra, Cancer Center Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain.
Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer ginecológicO (GEICO), Madrid, Spain.
J Clin Oncol. 2024 Dec 20;42(36):4294-4304. doi: 10.1200/JCO.24.00668. Epub 2024 Sep 18.
To evaluate atezolizumab combined with platinum-based chemotherapy (CT) followed by maintenance niraparib for late-relapsing recurrent ovarian cancer.
The multicenter placebo-controlled double-blind randomized phase III ENGOT-OV41/GEICO 69-O/ANITA trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03598270) enrolled patients with measurable high-grade serous, endometrioid, or undifferentiated recurrent ovarian cancer who had received one or two previous CT lines (most recent including platinum) and had a treatment-free interval since last platinum (TFIp) of >6 months. Patients were stratified by investigator-selected carboplatin doublet, TFIp, status, and PD-L1 status in de novo biopsy and randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either atezolizumab or placebo throughout standard therapy comprising six cycles of a carboplatin doublet followed (in patients with response/stable disease) by maintenance niraparib until progression. The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) per RECIST v1.1.
Between November 2018 and January 2022, 417 patients were randomly assigned (15% mutated, 36% PD-L1-positive, 66% TFIp >12 months, 11% previous poly [ADP-ribose] polymerase inhibitor after frontline CT, and 53% previous bevacizumab). Median follow-up was 28.6 months (95% CI, 26.6 to 30.5 months). Atezolizumab did not significantly improve PFS (hazard ratio, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.71 to 1.10]; = .28). Median PFS was 11.2 months (95% CI, 10.1 to 12.1 months) with atezolizumab versus 10.1 months (95% CI, 9.2 to 11.2 months) with standard therapy. Subgroup analyses generally showed consistent results, including analyses by PD-L1 status. The objective response rate (ORR) was 45% (95% CI, 39 to 52) with atezolizumab and 43% (95% CI, 36 to 49) with standard therapy. The safety profile was as expected from previous experience of these drugs.
Combining atezolizumab with CT and maintenance niraparib for late-relapsing recurrent ovarian cancer did not significantly improve PFS or the ORR.
评估阿替利珠单抗联合铂类化疗(CT),随后使用尼拉帕利维持治疗晚期复发性卵巢癌的疗效。
多中心安慰剂对照双盲随机III期ENGOT-OV41/GEICO 69-O/ANITA试验(ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03598270)纳入了可测量的高级别浆液性、子宫内膜样或未分化复发性卵巢癌患者,这些患者既往接受过1或2线CT治疗(最近一次包括铂类),且自上次铂类治疗后的无治疗间隔期(TFIp)>6个月。患者根据研究者选择的卡铂双联方案、TFIp、状态以及初诊活检中的程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)状态进行分层,并以1:1的比例随机分配,在包括六个周期卡铂双联方案的标准治疗期间接受阿替利珠单抗或安慰剂治疗(对有反应/疾病稳定的患者),随后使用尼拉帕利维持治疗直至疾病进展。主要终点是研究者根据实体瘤疗效评价标准(RECIST)v1.1评估的无进展生存期(PFS)。
2018年11月至2022年1月期间,417例患者被随机分配(15%发生突变,36%为PD-L1阳性,66%的TFIp>12个月,11%在一线CT治疗后曾使用过聚(ADP-核糖)聚合酶抑制剂,53%曾使用过贝伐单抗)。中位随访时间为28.6个月(95%置信区间,26.6至30.5个月)。阿替利珠单抗未显著改善PFS(风险比,0.89 [95%置信区间,0.71至1.10];P = 0.28)。阿替利珠单抗组的中位PFS为11.2个月(95%置信区间,10.1至12.1个月),而标准治疗组为10.1个月(95%置信区间,9.2至11.2个月)。亚组分析总体显示结果一致,包括按PD-L1状态进行的分析。阿替利珠单抗组的客观缓解率(ORR)为45%(95%置信区间,39至52),标准治疗组为43%(95%置信区间,36至49)。安全性与这些药物先前的经验预期一致。
对于晚期复发性卵巢癌,将阿替利珠单抗与CT及尼拉帕利维持治疗联合使用并未显著改善PFS或ORR。