Cancer Section, Developmental Biology and Cancer Programme, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK.
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Surg Endosc. 2024 Nov;38(11):6227-6236. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11236-5. Epub 2024 Sep 18.
Medical devices for fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS) are becoming available at a fast pace. The main challenge for surgeons lies in the lack of in-depth knowledge of optical imaging, different technical specifications and poor standardisation, and the selection of the best device based on clinical application.
This manuscript aims to provide an up-to-date description of the commercially available fluorescence imaging platforms by comparing their mode of use, required settings, image types, compatible fluorophores, regulatory approval, and cost. We obtained this information by performing a broad literature search on PubMed and by contacting medical companies directly. The data for this review were collected up to November 2023.
Thirty-two devices made by 19 medical companies were identified. Ten systems are surgical microscopes, 5 can be used for both open and minimally invasive surgery (MIS), 6 can only be used for open surgery, and 10 only for MIS. One is a fluorescence system available for the Da Vinci robot. Nineteen devices can provide an overlay between fluorescence and white light image. All devices are compatible with Indocyanine Green, the most common fluorescence dye used intraoperatively. There is significant variability in the hardware and software of each device, which resulted in different sensitivity, fluorescence intensity, and image quality. All devices are CE-mark regulated, and 30 were FDA-approved.
There is a prolific market of devices for FGS and healthcare professionals should have basic knowledge of their technical specifications to use it at best for each clinical indication. Standardisation across devices must be a priority in the field of FGS, and it will enhance external validity for future clinical trials in the field.
荧光引导手术(FGS)的医疗器械正快速面世。对于外科医生来说,主要的挑战在于缺乏对光学成像的深入了解、不同的技术规格和较差的标准化,以及基于临床应用选择最佳设备的能力。
本文旨在通过比较商业上可获得的荧光成像平台的使用方式、所需设置、图像类型、兼容荧光染料、监管批准和成本,对其进行最新描述。我们通过在 PubMed 上进行广泛的文献检索,并直接联系医疗公司,获得了这些信息。本综述的数据收集截至 2023 年 11 月。
确定了 19 家医疗公司的 32 种设备。其中 10 种系统是手术显微镜,5 种可用于开放和微创外科手术(MIS),6 种只能用于开放手术,10 种只能用于 MIS。一种是达芬奇机器人可用的荧光系统。19 种设备可提供荧光和白光图像的叠加。所有设备均与术中常用的荧光染料吲哚菁绿兼容。每种设备的硬件和软件都存在显著差异,导致其灵敏度、荧光强度和图像质量不同。所有设备均获得 CE 标志监管,其中 30 种获得 FDA 批准。
FGS 设备市场繁荣,医疗保健专业人员应基本了解其技术规格,以便在每个临床适应症下最佳地使用。FGS 领域的标准化必须是优先事项,这将提高该领域未来临床试验的外部有效性。