Division of Prevention Science, University of California School of Medicine UCSF, 550 16th Street, 3rd Floor, Box 0886, 94143, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 18;24(1):2537. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19771-5.
Given increased interest and investment in guaranteed income initiatives across North America, it is critical to understand the impact of guaranteed income on health, an understudied outcome. As part of Baltimore, Maryland's guaranteed income pilot, we conducted formative research to understand the influence of increased income on health and develop concrete recommendations for implementation and evaluation of the pilot.
We conducted semi-structured in-depth interviews with Baltimore community residents (n = 8) and community collaborators (n = 8), probing on familiarity with guaranteed income; effect of guaranteed income on overall health and specific health outcomes (e.g., mental health, nutrition); and recommendations for program structure (e.g., eligibility, target population). Data were analyzed thematically using a framework analysis approach.
Respondents agreed that guaranteed income could have beneficial effects on health though some were unsure of specific mechanisms. Respondents emphasized pathways through which guaranteed income could improve health: (1) reduced financial-related stress; (2) improved nutrition through purchase of healthier foods; (3) improved family well-being including child health and parent-child relationships; (4) increased utilization of health services; (5) improved community health through increased community cohesion and decreased violence. Respondents described decreased feelings of time scarcity as a social determinant of health. Most respondents reported that Baltimore's guaranteed income program should prioritize young, low-income families with $1,000/month or more for at least one year.
This formative research on the potential health impacts of guaranteed income in Baltimore highlights important health outcomes and pathways, such as social cohesion and decreased feelings of time scarcity, to prioritize for evaluation.
鉴于北美地区对保证收入计划的兴趣和投资不断增加,了解保证收入对健康的影响至关重要,而健康是一个研究不足的结果。作为马里兰州巴尔的摩保证收入试点项目的一部分,我们进行了形成性研究,以了解增加收入对健康的影响,并为试点项目的实施和评估提出具体建议。
我们对巴尔的摩社区居民(n=8)和社区合作者(n=8)进行了半结构化深入访谈,探讨他们对保证收入的熟悉程度;保证收入对整体健康和特定健康结果(例如心理健康、营养)的影响;以及对计划结构的建议(例如资格、目标人群)。使用框架分析方法对数据进行主题分析。
受访者一致认为保证收入可能对健康产生有益影响,但有些人不确定具体机制。受访者强调了保证收入改善健康的途径:(1)减少与财务相关的压力;(2)通过购买更健康的食品改善营养;(3)改善家庭福祉,包括儿童健康和亲子关系;(4)增加对医疗服务的利用;(5)通过增加社区凝聚力和减少暴力来改善社区健康。受访者描述了减少时间短缺感是健康的一个社会决定因素。大多数受访者报告说,巴尔的摩的保证收入计划应优先考虑年收入至少 1000 美元或以上的年轻低收入家庭。
这项关于巴尔的摩保证收入对健康潜在影响的形成性研究强调了一些重要的健康结果和途径,如社会凝聚力和减少时间短缺感,这些结果和途径应优先进行评估。