Suppr超能文献

现场沟通措施作为户外休闲管理工具:一项系统综述

On-site communication measures as a tool in outdoor recreation management: a systematic map.

作者信息

Selvaag Sofie Kjendlie, Keller Rose, Aas Øystein, Gundersen Vegard, Singsaas Frode Thomassen

机构信息

Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA), Høgskoleringen 9, 7034, Trondheim, Norway.

Faculty for Environment and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), 1432, Ås, Norway.

出版信息

Environ Evid. 2023 Jul 22;12(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s13750-023-00305-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Communication is a central tool used to manage the balance between outdoor recreation and environmental protection in natural areas. Several studies have evaluated different communication measures in case studies, but rarely are these measures compared across contexts. We review the literature guided by the question: what is the scope of evidence of on-site communication to change human behavior towards a more sustainable direction in outdoor recreation? Taking natural areas as our starting point, we map research-based distribution and abundance of communication measures, with emphasis on their outcomes and study design.

METHODS

The target population for our mapping review are outdoor recreationists and nature-based tourists who visit natural or near-natural settings. We examined studies that have crafted written, oral and visual intervention measures to change behavior by using persuasion, education and information rather than legal restrictions or bans. Examples of challenges addressed with communication measures include proper waste disposal, using designated trails, minimizing wear and tear at campsites, avoid disturbing wildlife, and encouraging appropriate and safe behavior. We did not restrict our search geographically. We searched publication databases for peer-reviewed published articles (WoS, Scopus) and forward and backward citation chasing. To identify grey literature we used the database IRMA and internet searches in Google Scholar supplemented with specialist searches. Inclusion criteria and related search terms were based on PICO and included population (P: people participating in outdoor recreation in natural settings), terms that denoted intervention (I: on-site communication measures in situ vs. C: no communication measures) and terms that denoted outcome (O: changed behavior). We screened first by title and abstract and finally full text. For each article selected for full-text screening, metadata was extracted on key variables of interest such as behavior category, context, targeted population, study design and outcomes.

REVIEW FINDINGS

Overall, we identified 54 studies that were assessed in the review. Our review documents growing academic interest looking at actual behavior change in outdoor recreation. Theory is often subsidiary to attempted behavioral change via communication and different situational aspects, such as targeted visitor populations and environmental context, as well as psychological factors remain underexplored in the literature. The primary communication medium in the reviewed papers is passive use of signs. Awareness raising is the dominant communication mode, but other modes such as emotions, identity, and social norms are common. The geographic distribution of the studies is highly skewed to the United States.

CONCLUSIONS

The amassed studies have an uneven focus on different settings and mediums used to change behavior. Research could benefit from investigating different contexts and the state of the natural environment before and after interventions. We advocate for casting a wider disciplinary net and interest in qualitative investigations to produce data-rich studies of where and how sustainable behavior is encouraged and eventually achieved. Collectively, different disciplinary perspectives are required to understand the aspects that contribute to sustainable, and sustained, behavior change. It is important to distinguish what aspects of behavior change could be generalized across settings, and which purely contextual aspects drive behavior change.

摘要

背景

沟通是在自然区域管理户外休闲与环境保护之间平衡的核心手段。多项研究在案例研究中评估了不同的沟通措施,但这些措施很少在不同背景下进行比较。我们以如下问题为导向回顾文献:在户外休闲中,促使人类行为朝着更可持续方向转变的现场沟通的证据范围是什么?以自然区域为出发点,我们绘制基于研究的沟通措施分布及丰富程度图,重点关注其结果和研究设计。

方法

我们的图谱综述的目标人群是前往自然或近自然环境的户外休闲者和以自然为基础的游客。我们考察了那些通过说服、教育和信息而非法律限制或禁令来制定书面、口头和视觉干预措施以改变行为的研究。通过沟通措施解决的挑战示例包括正确的废物处理、使用指定小径、尽量减少露营地的磨损、避免惊扰野生动物以及鼓励适当和安全的行为。我们没有对搜索进行地理限制。我们在出版物数据库中搜索同行评审的已发表文章(Web of Science、Scopus)以及向前和向后的引文追踪。为识别灰色文献,我们使用了IRMA数据库并在谷歌学术中进行互联网搜索,并辅以专业搜索。纳入标准和相关搜索词基于PICO,包括人群(P:参与自然环境中户外休闲的人)、表示干预的术语(I:现场沟通措施与C:无沟通措施)以及表示结果的术语(O:行为改变)。我们首先通过标题和摘要进行筛选,最后进行全文筛选。对于每篇选定进行全文筛选的文章,提取了关于感兴趣的关键变量的元数据,如行为类别、背景、目标人群、研究设计和结果。

综述结果

总体而言,我们在综述中确定了54项研究。我们的综述记录了学术界对户外休闲中实际行为改变的兴趣日益浓厚。理论往往从属于通过沟通尝试实现的行为改变,而不同的情境因素,如目标游客群体和环境背景,以及心理因素在文献中仍未得到充分探索。综述论文中的主要沟通媒介是被动使用标志。提高意识是主要的沟通模式,但其他模式如情感、身份和社会规范也很常见。这些研究的地理分布严重偏向美国。

结论

大量研究对用于改变行为的不同环境和媒介的关注不均衡。研究可从调查不同背景以及干预前后自然环境状况中受益。我们主张扩大学科范围并对定性研究产生兴趣,以开展关于鼓励并最终实现可持续行为的地点和方式的数据丰富的研究。总体而言,需要不同的学科视角来理解促成可持续及持久行为改变的各个方面。区分哪些行为改变方面可以在不同环境中推广,哪些纯粹是情境因素驱动行为改变很重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5f6/11378867/a32b6c8f4d3e/13750_2023_305_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验