• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

参与式情景在生态恢复中的作用:一项系统综述方案

The role of participatory scenarios in ecological restoration: a systematic map protocol.

作者信息

Moore Eleanor, Howson Pete, Grainger Matthew, Teh Yit Arn, Pfeifer Marion

机构信息

School of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

Department of Social Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

出版信息

Environ Evid. 2022 Jun 22;11(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13750-022-00276-w.

DOI:10.1186/s13750-022-00276-w
PMID:39294769
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11378783/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The scale of land degradation worldwide has led the UN to declare the Decade of Ecosystem Restoration and movements such as the Bonn Challenge ( https://www.bonnchallenge.org/ ), have placed ecological restoration on the global policy agenda. Achieving such ambitious policy targets and restoration goals will necessitate complex trade-offs against limited time, competing knowledge, costs, resources, and varying societal preferences among different stakeholders. Participatory scenarios are a tool to navigate uncertainties surrounding future trajectories and simultaneously incorporate different stakeholder perspectives. They can provide a path to identify collaborative solutions best suited for the local cultures and societies they are tied to. However, there is no systematic understanding of how participatory scenarios are being used in ecological restoration planning to navigate trade-offs in restoration outcomes. We will fill this research gap by mapping the existing evidence from participatory restoration scenarios to answer the primary research question 'How are outcomes explored in participatory ecological restoration scenarios?'. This will be done through five sub-questions focussing on characteristics of the evidence base, types of study design, how outcomes and trade-offs in those are explored, and an examination of the role of participants in the scenario process and outcome determination.

METHODS

This protocol outlines the methods for a systematic map to identify studies that have used participatory scenarios in restoration planning. A comprehensive and reproducible search strategy will be undertaken across bibliographic databases, web-based engines, and targeted searches in organisational online libraries. Searches will be done online in English, but results in all languages will be screened. Search results will go through a two-step screening process of against pre-determined criteria of inclusion and exclusion, for title and abstract and then full-text. Data will be extracted from eligible studies using a standardised data extraction spreadsheet where details on study characteristics, design and outcomes will be recorded. A searchable database of studies and mapping outcomes will be available upon completion of the work. The aim is to inform how scenarios can be better used as a decision-making tool to increase stakeholder participation and account for trade-offs in restoration outcomes across social, ecological, and economic dimensions.

摘要

背景

全球土地退化的规模促使联合国宣布了生态系统恢复十年计划,诸如波恩挑战(https://www.bonnchallenge.org/)等行动已将生态恢复提上全球政策议程。要实现如此宏伟的政策目标和恢复目标,就必须在有限的时间、相互竞争的知识、成本、资源以及不同利益相关者之间各异的社会偏好之间进行复杂的权衡。参与式情景分析是一种应对未来发展轨迹不确定性的工具,同时能纳入不同利益相关者的观点。它们可以提供一条途径,以确定最适合与其相关的当地文化和社会的合作解决方案。然而,对于参与式情景分析如何在生态恢复规划中用于权衡恢复结果,目前尚无系统的认识。我们将通过梳理参与式恢复情景分析的现有证据来填补这一研究空白,以回答主要研究问题:“在参与式生态恢复情景分析中如何探索结果?”。这将通过五个子问题来完成,重点关注证据基础的特征、研究设计类型、如何探索其中的结果和权衡,以及考察参与者在情景分析过程和结果确定中的作用。

方法

本方案概述了一项系统图谱研究的方法,以识别在恢复规划中使用参与式情景分析的研究。将在书目数据库、网络搜索引擎以及组织在线图书馆的定向搜索中开展全面且可重复的搜索策略。搜索将以英语在线进行,但所有语言的结果都将进行筛选。搜索结果将经过两步筛选过程,首先根据预先确定的纳入和排除标准对标题和摘要进行筛选,然后对全文进行筛选。将使用标准化的数据提取电子表格从符合条件的研究中提取数据,记录研究特征有关详细信息、设计和结果。工作完成后将建立一个可搜索的研究数据库和映射结果。目的是为如何更好地将情景分析用作决策工具提供信息,以增加利益相关者的参与,并在社会、生态和经济层面权衡恢复结果。

相似文献

1
The role of participatory scenarios in ecological restoration: a systematic map protocol.参与式情景在生态恢复中的作用:一项系统综述方案
Environ Evid. 2022 Jun 22;11(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13750-022-00276-w.
2
Existing evidence on the use of participatory scenarios in ecological restoration: a systematic map.生态恢复中参与式情景使用的现有证据:一份系统综述
Environ Evid. 2023 Nov 30;12(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13750-023-00314-1.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
5
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
6
Evidence on the ecological and physical effects of built structures in shallow, tropical coral reefs: a systematic map.浅海热带珊瑚礁中建筑结构的生态和物理影响证据:一项系统综述
Environ Evid. 2024 May 14;13(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13750-024-00336-3.
7
Using Optimal Land-Use Scenarios to Assess Trade-Offs between Conservation, Development, and Social Values.利用最优土地利用情景评估保护、发展和社会价值之间的权衡。
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 30;11(6):e0158350. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158350. eCollection 2016.
8
Non-familial intergenerational interventions and their impact on social and mental wellbeing of both younger and older people-A mapping review and evidence and gap map.非家庭代际干预及其对年轻人和老年人社会与心理健康的影响——一项映射综述以及证据与差距图谱
Campbell Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 16;19(1):e1306. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1306. eCollection 2023 Mar.
9
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
10
What is the volume, quality and characteristics of evidence relating to the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of multi-disciplinary occupational health interventions aiming to improve work-related outcomes for employed adults? An evidence and gap map of systematic reviews.旨在改善成年就业者与工作相关结果的多学科职业健康干预措施的有效性和成本效益相关证据的数量、质量及特征是什么?一项系统评价的证据与差距图谱。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 May 14;20(2):e1412. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1412. eCollection 2024 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Ecological restoration should be redefined for the twenty-first century.生态修复应在21世纪重新定义。
Restor Ecol. 2017 Sep 24;25(5):668-673. doi: 10.1111/rec.12554.
2
Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews.Rayyan——一款用于系统评价的网络和移动应用程序。
Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 5;5(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4.
3
Evaluating taboo trade-offs in ecosystems services and human well-being.评估生态系统服务与人类福祉中的禁忌权衡。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Jun 2;112(22):6949-54. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1414900112. Epub 2015 May 18.
4
Beyond PICO: the SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis.超越 PICO:用于定性证据综合的 SPIDER 工具。
Qual Health Res. 2012 Oct;22(10):1435-43. doi: 10.1177/1049732312452938. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
5
Social and ecological synergy: local rulemaking, forest livelihoods, and biodiversity conservation.社会与生态协同:地方规则制定、森林生计与生物多样性保护。
Science. 2011 Mar 25;331(6024):1606-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1199343.