Suppr超能文献

职业棒球投手在采用绕环投球法和伸展投球法投球时,产生的球速和运动学特征相似:一项生物力学分析。

Professional baseball pitchers produce similar ball velocity and kinematics when pitching from the wind-up and stretch deliveries: a biomechanical analysis.

作者信息

Hodakowski Alexander, Dowling Brittany, Brusalis Christopher M, Olmanson Bjorn A, Streepy John T, McCormick Johnathon R, Dowling Brockton A, Verma Nikhil N, Garrigues Grant E

机构信息

Rush Medical College, Chicago, IL, USA.

Sports Medicine, Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Sports Biomech. 2024 Dec;23(12):3680-3692. doi: 10.1080/14763141.2024.2398507. Epub 2024 Sep 18.

Abstract

Historically, the wind-up delivery is considered a more biomechanically advantageous pitching motion compared to the stretch. Recently, some pitchers have shifted to pitching exclusively from the stretch regardless of the game situation. The goal of this study was to compare temporal, kinematic and kinetic variables between the wind-up and stretch deliveries. Professional pitchers ( = 52, 189.1 ± 4.8 cm, 92.8 ± 8.4 kg) threw fastballs evaluated by 3D-motion capture (480 Hz) from both the wind-up and stretch deliveries. Within a pitcher, there was no significant difference in ball velocity between the two deliveries ( = 0.15). The stretch delivery was significantly quicker to ball release at toe off 2 ( < 0.001) (the last frame the pitcher's foot contacts the ground before progressing to maximum knee height) and maximum knee height ( < 0.001). The majority of differences occurred prior to foot contact. The wind-up delivery produced greater maximum shoulder external rotation ( < 0.001) and lead knee flexion at ball release ( < 0.001). Pitching from the stretch incurred greater shoulder superior force ( < 0.001). It remains unknown if this is clinically significant as pooled means show only a 2% difference. Therefore, pitching a fastball from either the wind-up or stretch delivery provides comparable mechanics and throwing arm load with likely comparable risk of injury.

摘要

从历史上看,与伸展式投球相比,绕环式投球被认为在生物力学上是更具优势的投球动作。最近,一些投手无论比赛情况如何,都完全改为从伸展式开始投球。本研究的目的是比较绕环式和伸展式投球之间的时间、运动学和动力学变量。职业投手(n = 52,身高189.1 ± 4.8厘米,体重92.8 ± 8.4千克)通过3D运动捕捉(480赫兹)从绕环式和伸展式投球两种方式投出快球。在一名投手内部,两种投球方式的球速没有显著差异(p = 0.15)。在离地2(p < 0.001)(投手的脚在达到最大膝盖高度之前最后一次接触地面的帧)和最大膝盖高度(p < 0.001)时,伸展式投球到球释放的速度明显更快。大多数差异发生在脚接触之前。绕环式投球在球释放时产生更大的肩部最大外旋(p < 0.001)和前导膝屈曲(p < 0.001)。从伸展式投球会产生更大的肩部上向力(p < 0.001)。由于汇总平均值仅显示2%的差异,目前尚不清楚这在临床上是否具有显著意义。因此,无论是从绕环式还是伸展式投出快球,都能提供相当的力学原理和投掷手臂负荷,受伤风险可能相当。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验