• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

警戒的战略分配理论。

The strategic allocation theory of vigilance.

机构信息

Laboratorio de Juicios y Emociones Morales, Universidad de Los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia.

Department of Philosophy, Providence College, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.

出版信息

Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2024 Nov-Dec;15(6):e1693. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1693. Epub 2024 Sep 18.

DOI:10.1002/wcs.1693
PMID:39295156
Abstract

Despite its importance in different occupational and everyday contexts, vigilance, typically defined as the capacity to sustain attention over time, is remarkably limited. What explains these limits? Two theories have been proposed. The Overload Theory states that being vigilant consumes limited information-processing resources; when depleted, task performance degrades. The Underload Theory states that motivation to perform vigilance tasks declines over time, thereby prompting attentional shifts and hindering performance. We highlight some conceptual and empirical problems for both theories and propose an alternative: the Strategic Allocation Theory. For the Strategic Allocation Theory, performance on vigilance tasks optimizes as a function of intrinsic and extrinsic motivations, including metacognitive factors such as the expected value of effort and the expected value of planning. Limited capacities must be deployed across task sets to maximize expected reward. The observed limits of vigilance reflect changes in the perceived value of, among other things, sustaining attention to a task rather than attending to something else. Drawing from recent computational theories of cognitive control and meta-reasoning, we argue that the Strategic Allocation Theory explains more phenomena related to vigilance behavior than other theories, including self-report data. Finally, we outline some of the testable predictions the theory makes across several experimental paradigms. This article is categorized under: Philosophy > Foundations of Cognitive Science Psychology > Attention.

摘要

尽管在不同的职业和日常环境中都很重要,但警觉——通常被定义为长时间保持注意力的能力——却惊人地有限。这些限制的原因是什么?有两种理论被提出来解释这个现象。过载理论认为,警觉需要消耗有限的信息处理资源;当这些资源被耗尽时,任务表现就会下降。低负荷理论则认为,执行警觉任务的动机随着时间的推移而下降,从而促使注意力转移,并阻碍表现。我们强调了这两种理论的一些概念和实证问题,并提出了一个替代理论:策略分配理论。对于策略分配理论,警觉任务的表现是作为内在和外在动机的函数而优化的,包括元认知因素,如努力的预期价值和计划的预期价值。必须在任务集中分配有限的能力,以最大化预期奖励。警觉的观察到的限制反映了维持对任务的注意力而不是关注其他事物的感知价值的变化。借鉴最近关于认知控制和元推理的计算理论,我们认为,与其他理论相比,策略分配理论可以解释更多与警觉行为相关的现象,包括自我报告数据。最后,我们概述了该理论在几个实验范式中可以做出的一些可测试的预测。本文属于以下分类:哲学 >认知科学基础心理学 >注意

相似文献

1
The strategic allocation theory of vigilance.警戒的战略分配理论。
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2024 Nov-Dec;15(6):e1693. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1693. Epub 2024 Sep 18.
2
Effects of state motivation in overload and underload vigilance task scenarios.状态动机在超负荷和低负荷警觉任务场景中的影响。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2019 Jun;197:106-114. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.05.007. Epub 2019 May 24.
3
An integrative effort: Bridging motivational intensity theory and recent neurocomputational and neuronal models of effort and control allocation.一项综合性的努力:弥合动机强度理论与最近的神经计算和神经元努力与控制分配模型之间的差距。
Psychol Rev. 2023 Jul;130(4):1081-1103. doi: 10.1037/rev0000372. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
4
Is Semantic Vigilance Impaired by Narrative Memory Demands? Theory and Applications.语义警觉是否会受到叙事记忆需求的影响?理论与应用。
Hum Factors. 2019 May;61(3):451-461. doi: 10.1177/0018720818805602. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
5
Mind-wandering, cognition, and performance: a theory-driven meta-analysis of attention regulation.思维漫游、认知和表现:注意力调节的理论驱动元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2014 Nov;140(6):1411-1431. doi: 10.1037/a0037428. Epub 2014 Aug 4.
6
The role of reward and task demand in value-based strategic allocation of auditory comprehension effort.奖励和任务需求在基于价值的听觉理解努力的策略分配中的作用。
Hear Res. 2019 Sep 15;381:107775. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2019.107775. Epub 2019 Aug 2.
7
Predicting battlefield vigilance: a multivariate approach to assessment of attentional resources.预测战场警觉性:一种评估注意力资源的多变量方法。
Ergonomics. 2014;57(6):856-75. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2014.899630. Epub 2014 Mar 31.
8
The Abbreviated Vigilance Task and Its Attentional Contributors.简易警觉任务及其注意力贡献者。
Hum Factors. 2019 May;61(3):426-439. doi: 10.1177/0018720818822350. Epub 2019 Jan 25.
9
Will the real resource theory please stand up! Vigilance is a renewable resource and should be modeled as such.真正的资源理论能站出来吗!警觉是一种可再生资源,应该如此建模。
Exp Brain Res. 2023 May;241(5):1263-1270. doi: 10.1007/s00221-023-06604-x. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
10
Sustaining attention for a prolonged period of time increases temporal variability in cortical responses.长时间保持注意力会增加皮质反应的时间变异性。
Cortex. 2019 Aug;117:16-32. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.02.016. Epub 2019 Mar 1.

引用本文的文献

1
A Novel Hybrid Approach for Drowsiness Detection Using EEG Scalograms to Overcome Inter-Subject Variability.一种使用脑电图频谱图检测嗜睡的新型混合方法,以克服个体间差异。
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Sep 5;25(17):5530. doi: 10.3390/s25175530.