Suppr超能文献

免疫治疗后挽救性肺切除术是可行且安全的。

Salvage lung resection after immunotherapy is feasible and safe.

作者信息

Nemeth Attila, Canavan Maureen E, Zhan Peter L, Udelsman Brooks V, Ely Sora, Wigle Dennis A, Martin Linda, Jeffrey Yang Chi-Fu, Boffa Daniel J, Dhanasopon Andrew P

机构信息

Department for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Department of Internal Medicine, Cancer Outcomes Public Policy and Effectiveness Research Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn.

出版信息

JTCVS Open. 2024 Apr 23;20:141-150. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2024.03.018. eCollection 2024 Aug.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with immunotherapy and modern chemoradiation regimens show improved progression-free and overall survival. However, patients with limited oligo-progression represent a potential population in which local therapy such as surgery may have a potential role as salvage treatment. The objectives of our study were to evaluate the feasibility and safety of salvage lung resection after immunotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was queried for patients diagnosed and treated for non-small cell lung cancer stage I to IV, from 2013 to 2020. Patients who underwent surgery as salvage after immunotherapy were defined as undergoing surgery >5 months from the initiation of immunotherapy. As a sensitivity analysis, patients who underwent surgery as salvage after chemoradiation were also analyzed in a similar fashion. Surgical outcomes such as type of surgery, complete resection (R0) rates, and complete pathologic response rates were determined for feasibility. Length of stay, 30-day readmission rates, and 30-day mortality rates were determined and overall survivals were estimated with Kaplan-Meier analysis to evaluate for safety.

RESULTS

Of the 934,093 patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer stage I to IV from 2013 to 2020, 164 patients received immunotherapy and after 5 months underwent surgery. Lobectomy was the most commonly performed operation (74%) and pneumonectomy was required in 9% (n = 15). R0 resection was achieved in 89% (n = 146) and of these patients, 23% (n = 37) had complete pathologic response. Median length of stay was 4 days, 30-day readmission was 5%, and 30-day mortality was 0.6%. In our sensitivity analysis of chemoradiation patients (n = 445), the above data were similar to previously reported cohort studies of patients undergoing chemoradiation and subsequently salvage surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Lung resection after immunotherapy appears to be a feasible salvage treatment option, with lobectomy being most common and with high R0 resection rates. Low patient morbidity and mortality rates also suggest the safety of this approach. Salvage surgery may be considered in patients who have oligo-progression after immunotherapy within the context of a comprehensive multidisciplinary treatment plan.

摘要

目的

接受免疫治疗和现代放化疗方案治疗的非小细胞肺癌患者的无进展生存期和总生存期有所改善。然而,寡转移进展有限的患者是一个潜在群体,手术等局部治疗可能作为挽救性治疗发挥潜在作用。我们研究的目的是评估非小细胞肺癌患者免疫治疗后挽救性肺切除的可行性和安全性。

方法

查询国家癌症数据库中2013年至2020年诊断并治疗的I至IV期非小细胞肺癌患者。免疫治疗后作为挽救性治疗接受手术的患者定义为自免疫治疗开始后>5个月接受手术。作为敏感性分析,对放化疗后作为挽救性治疗接受手术的患者也进行了类似分析。确定手术类型、完全切除(R0)率和完全病理缓解率等手术结果以评估可行性。确定住院时间、30天再入院率和30天死亡率,并采用Kaplan-Meier分析估计总生存期以评估安全性。

结果

在2013年至2020年诊断为I至IV期非小细胞肺癌的934,093例患者中,164例接受免疫治疗,5个月后接受手术。肺叶切除术是最常实施的手术(74%),9%(n = 15)需要全肺切除术。89%(n = 146)实现了R0切除,其中23%(n = 37)有完全病理缓解。中位住院时间为4天,30天再入院率为5%,30天死亡率为0.6%。在我们对放化疗患者(n = 445)的敏感性分析中,上述数据与先前报道的接受放化疗并随后进行挽救性手术的患者队列研究相似。

结论

免疫治疗后肺切除似乎是一种可行的挽救性治疗选择,肺叶切除术最常见且R0切除率高。患者低发病率和死亡率也表明这种方法的安全性。在综合多学科治疗计划的背景下,免疫治疗后出现寡转移进展的患者可考虑进行挽救性手术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf91/11405986/bb1a21851f28/ga1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验