• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

硬膜外类固醇注射后多久能预测患者的反应?

How soon after an epidural steroid injection can you predict the patient's response?

作者信息

Schneider Byron J, Chukwuma Valentine U, Fechtel Blake M, Kennedy David J

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

出版信息

Interv Pain Med. 2024 Sep 7;3(3):100435. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2024.100435. eCollection 2024 Sep.

DOI:10.1016/j.inpm.2024.100435
PMID:39296675
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11407044/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Epidural steroid injections (ESI) are utilized for the management of radicular pain, but there are no previous published studies that detail the specific timeline of patient response to an ESI.

PURPOSE

To describe patients' temporal response in pain relief following an ESI.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Prospective in vivo study of consecutive patients at an outpatient physical medicine and rehabilitation clinic at a single academic spine center.

PATIENT SAMPLE

134 consecutive patients who received an ESI between January 2020 through June 2020.

METHODS

Patients were contacted every 3 days ± 1 day for 21 days post ESI to assess pain as measured via 11-point numeric pain score and subjective percentage pain relief question.

RESULTS

134 consecutive patients were enrolled, with 108 (80.6 %) having follow-up data through 3 weeks post ESI. At 3 weeks, 51/108 patients (47.2 %) had reported a successful response as defined by at least 50 % reduction of their pain index. Of these 51 patients, 37 (72.5 %) reported >50 % relief on day 1, a further 11 (21.6 %) first reported >50 % relief on day 4, and the remaining 3 (5.9 %) successes first reported >50 % relief on days 13, 16, and 22. 57/108 patients (52.8 %) were non-responders, most of whom never reached the 50 % threshold at any time point. Of these non-responders, 19/57 (33.3 %) did report >50 % relief on day 1. Those patient's pain relief fell below 50 % on day 4 (12/19 patients, 63.2 %), day 7 (5/19 patients, 26.3 %), day 13 (1 patient, 5.3 %), and day 16 (1 patient, 5.3 %). A positive response or negative response at each follow up point was looked at as a predictor of a concordant three-week outcome for the population. The positive likelihood ratio at follow-up day 1, day 4, day 7, and day 10, was 2.14, 6.12, 7.97, and 40 respectively. The negative likelihood ratio at follow-up day 1, day 4, day 7, and day 10 was 0.42, 0.15, 0.16, and 0.24 respectively.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: This is the first study to meticulously follow up patients every 72 h after ESI. A patient's response on day 4, either positive or negative, is predictive of their 3-week outcome. Sustained relief at day 7 or 10 further increases the likelihood of a positive 3-week outcome.

摘要

背景

硬膜外类固醇注射(ESI)用于治疗神经根性疼痛,但此前尚无已发表的研究详细说明患者对 ESI 反应的具体时间线。

目的

描述患者在接受 ESI 后疼痛缓解的时间反应。

研究设计/地点:在单一学术脊柱中心的门诊物理医学与康复诊所对连续患者进行的前瞻性体内研究。

患者样本

2020 年 1 月至 2020 年 6 月期间连续接受 ESI 的 134 名患者。

方法

在 ESI 后 21 天内,每 3 天±1 天联系患者,通过 11 点数字疼痛评分和主观疼痛缓解百分比问题评估疼痛情况。

结果

连续纳入 134 名患者,其中 108 名(80.6%)在 ESI 后 3 周有随访数据。在 3 周时,51/108 名患者(47.2%)报告有成功反应,定义为疼痛指数至少降低 50%。在这 51 名患者中,37 名(72.5%)在第 1 天报告疼痛缓解>50%,另外 11 名(21.6%)在第 4 天首次报告疼痛缓解>50%,其余 3 名(5.9%)在第 13、16 和 22 天首次报告疼痛缓解>50%。57/108 名患者(52.8%)无反应,其中大多数在任何时间点都未达到 50%的阈值。在这些无反应者中,19/57(33.3%)在第 1 天确实报告疼痛缓解>50%。这些患者的疼痛缓解在第 4 天(12/19 名患者,63.2%)、第 7 天(5/19 名患者,26.3%)、第 13 天(1 名患者,5.3%)和第 16 天(1 名患者,5.3%)降至 50%以下。将每个随访点的阳性或阴性反应视为总体人群 3 周结果一致性的预测指标。随访第 1、4、7 和 10 天的阳性似然比分别为 2.14、6.12、7.97 和 40。随访第 1、4、7 和 10 天的阴性似然比分别为 0.42、0.15、0.16 和 0.24。

讨论/结论:这是第一项在 ESI 后每 72 小时对患者进行细致随访的研究。患者在第 4 天的反应,无论是阳性还是阴性,都可预测其 3 周的结果。在第 7 天或第 10 天持续缓解进一步增加了 3 周结果为阳性的可能性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eef5/11407044/854038294cdb/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eef5/11407044/de24c125c7e4/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eef5/11407044/d13fc5a4306b/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eef5/11407044/0e7e04b758a8/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eef5/11407044/370de8cd20fc/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eef5/11407044/854038294cdb/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eef5/11407044/de24c125c7e4/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eef5/11407044/d13fc5a4306b/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eef5/11407044/0e7e04b758a8/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eef5/11407044/370de8cd20fc/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eef5/11407044/854038294cdb/gr5.jpg

相似文献

1
How soon after an epidural steroid injection can you predict the patient's response?硬膜外类固醇注射后多久能预测患者的反应?
Interv Pain Med. 2024 Sep 7;3(3):100435. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2024.100435. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Concordant pain provocation during transforaminal epidural steroid injection for lumbosacral radiculopathy: effect on pain outcome and predictive factors.经椎间孔硬膜外类固醇注射治疗腰骶神经根病时的疼痛激发一致性:对疼痛结局的影响及预测因素
Pain Physician. 2015 Jan-Feb;18(1):E19-26.
3
[Relevance of nerve blocks in treating and diagnosing low back pain--is the quality decisive?].[神经阻滞在治疗和诊断腰背痛中的相关性——质量起决定性作用吗?]
Schmerz. 2001 Dec;15(6):474-83. doi: 10.1007/s004820100035.
4
Can repeat injection provide clinical benefit in patients with cervical disc herniation and stenosis when the first epidural injection results only in partial response?当首次硬膜外注射仅产生部分反应时,重复注射对颈椎间盘突出症和狭窄患者是否具有临床益处?
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jul;95(29):e4131. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004131.
5
The value of short-term pain relief in predicting the long-term outcome of 'indirect' cervical epidural steroid injections.短期疼痛缓解在预测“间接”颈椎硬膜外类固醇注射长期疗效中的价值。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2018 May;160(5):935-943. doi: 10.1007/s00701-018-3511-2. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
6
Pain Reduction and Changes in Serum Cortisol, Adrenocorticotropic Hormone, and Glucose Levels after Epidural Injections With Different Doses of Corticosteroid.硬膜外注射不同剂量皮质类固醇后疼痛减轻及血清皮质醇、促肾上腺皮质激素和血糖水平的变化。
Pain Physician. 2024 Jan;27(1):E119-E129.
7
Retrospective analysis of cervical transforaminal versus interlaminar epidural steroid injections.颈椎经椎间孔与椎板间硬膜外类固醇注射的回顾性分析。
Interv Pain Med. 2022 May 25;1(2):100102. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2022.100102. eCollection 2022 Jun.
8
Can Repeat Injection Provide Clinical Benefit in Patients with Lumbosacral Diseases When First Epidural Injection Results Only in Partial Response?当首次硬膜外注射仅产生部分反应时,重复注射对腰骶部疾病患者是否具有临床益处?
Pain Physician. 2016 Feb;19(2):E283-90.
9
Epidural steroid injection versus conservative treatment for patients with lumbosacral radicular pain: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.硬膜外类固醇注射与保守治疗腰骶神经根性疼痛患者的比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jul 24;99(30):e21283. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021283.
10
Effect of pre-injection opioid use on post-injection patient-reported outcomes following epidural steroid injections for radicular pain.注射阿片类药物前对硬膜外类固醇注射治疗根性疼痛后患者报告结局的影响。
Spine J. 2018 May;18(5):788-796. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.09.009. Epub 2017 Sep 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Managing radicular pain in patients with normal MRIs: Challenges and insights?管理MRI正常患者的神经根性疼痛:挑战与见解?
Interv Pain Med. 2025 Jun 5;4(2):100591. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2025.100591. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
While prediction of treatment outcome is possible on day 4, the technical epidural approach and steroid selection may make a difference.虽然在第4天就有可能预测治疗结果,但技术上的硬膜外途径和类固醇的选择可能会有所不同。
Interv Pain Med. 2025 Jan 27;4(1):100544. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2025.100544. eCollection 2025 Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
Frequency of Epidural Steroid Injections.硬膜外类固醇注射的频率。
Pain Med. 2020 May 1;21(5):1078-1079. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnaa053.
2
The Effectiveness of Lumbar Transforaminal Injection of Steroid for the Treatment of Radicular Pain: A Comprehensive Review of the Published Data.腰椎经皮穿刺注射类固醇治疗根性疼痛的疗效:已发表数据的综合评价。
Pain Med. 2020 Mar 1;21(3):472-487. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz160.
3
Systemic effects of epidural steroid injections for spinal stenosis.硬膜外类固醇注射治疗椎管狭窄的全身效应。
Pain. 2018 May;159(5):876-883. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001158.
4
Systematic Review of the Efficacy of Particulate Versus Nonparticulate Corticosteroids in Epidural Injections.颗粒状与非颗粒状皮质类固醇用于硬膜外注射疗效的系统评价
PM R. 2017 May;9(5):502-512. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2016.11.008. Epub 2016 Nov 30.
5
Safety of epidural steroid injections.硬膜外类固醇注射的安全性。
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2016 Aug;15(8):1031-9. doi: 10.1080/14740338.2016.1184246. Epub 2016 May 13.
6
The effectiveness of repeat lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections.重复腰椎经椎间孔硬膜外类固醇注射的有效性。
Pain Med. 2014 Oct;15(10):1686-94. doi: 10.1111/pme.12497. Epub 2014 Jul 7.
7
Lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections: does immediate post-procedure pain response predict longer term effectiveness?腰椎经椎间孔硬膜外类固醇注射:术后即刻疼痛反应能否预测长期疗效?
Pain Med. 2014 Jun;15(6):921-8. doi: 10.1111/pme.12347. Epub 2014 Jan 21.
8
Comparative effectiveness of lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections with particulate versus nonparticulate corticosteroids for lumbar radicular pain due to intervertebral disc herniation: a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial.经皮腰椎椎间孔硬膜外类固醇注射治疗椎间盘源性腰椎根性痛的疗效比较:前瞻性、随机、双盲试验。
Pain Med. 2014 Apr;15(4):548-55. doi: 10.1111/pme.12325. Epub 2014 Jan 2.
9
The effectiveness and risks of fluoroscopically guided cervical transforaminal injections of steroids: a systematic review with comprehensive analysis of the published data.透视引导下颈椎经椎间孔注射类固醇的有效性和风险:对已发表数据的系统评价与综合分析
Pain Med. 2014 Mar;15(3):386-402. doi: 10.1111/pme.12304. Epub 2013 Dec 5.
10
The noninferiority of the nonparticulate steroid dexamethasone vs the particulate steroids betamethasone and triamcinolone in lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections.非颗粒性类固醇地塞米松与颗粒性类固醇倍他米松和曲安奈德在腰椎经椎间孔硬膜外类固醇注射中的非劣效性。
Pain Med. 2013 Nov;14(11):1650-7. doi: 10.1111/pme.12214. Epub 2013 Jul 30.