• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Symptom vs context: lessons learned from a large-scale implementation of the Cultural Formulation Interview.症状与背景:从文化定式访谈的大规模实施中吸取的经验教训
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Sep 4;15:1410865. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1410865. eCollection 2024.
2
The Cultural Formulation Interview since DSM-5: Prospects for training, research, and clinical practice.DSM-5 后的文化构念访谈:培训、研究和临床实践的前景。
Transcult Psychiatry. 2020 Aug;57(4):496-514. doi: 10.1177/1363461520940481.
3
A qualitative analysis of the documentation of DSM-5 Cultural Formulation Interviews with non-native speaking patients in a Swedish mental health care setting.对瑞典精神卫生保健机构中对非母语患者进行的《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(第五版)文化定式访谈记录的定性分析。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Feb 14;15:1298920. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1298920. eCollection 2024.
4
Update on the Cultural Formulation Interview.文化定式访谈的最新情况。
Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ). 2020 Jan;18(1):40-46. doi: 10.1176/appi.focus.20190037. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
5
Patients' and clinicians' experiences of the DSM-5 Cultural Formulation Interview: A mixed method study in a Swedish outpatient setting.患者和临床医生对 DSM-5 文化构念访谈的体验:瑞典门诊环境中的一项混合方法研究。
Transcult Psychiatry. 2020 Aug;57(4):542-555. doi: 10.1177/1363461520938917. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
6
Clinician Perceptions of Implementing the Cultural Formulation Interview on a Mixed Forensic Unit.临床医生对在混合法医病房实施文化构念访谈的看法。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2020 Jun;48(2):216-225. doi: 10.29158/JAAPL.003914-20. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
7
Person-Centered Cultural Assessment Can Improve Child Mental Health Service Engagement and Outcomes.以人为本的文化评估可以改善儿童心理健康服务的参与度和效果。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2022 Jan-Feb;51(1):1-22. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2021.1981340. Epub 2021 Dec 14.
8
Qualitative Analysis of Cultural Formulation Interview: Findings and Implications for Revising the Outline for Cultural Formulation.文化定式访谈的定性分析:研究结果及对修订文化定式大纲的启示
Transcult Psychiatry. 2020 Aug;57(4):525-541. doi: 10.1177/1363461518822407. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
9
Approaching "highly sensitive person" as a cultural concept of distress: a case-study using the cultural formulation interview in patients with bipolar disorder.将“高敏感人群”视为一种痛苦的文化概念:一项对双相情感障碍患者使用文化定式访谈的案例研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Sep 22;14:1148646. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1148646. eCollection 2023.
10
Clinical value of the cultural formulation interview in Pune, India.印度浦那的文化构念访谈的临床价值。
Indian J Psychiatry. 2015 Jan-Mar;57(1):59-67. doi: 10.4103/0019-5545.148524.

本文引用的文献

1
The effect of the cultural formulation interview on therapeutic working alliance: a study protocol.文化定式访谈对治疗工作联盟的影响:一项研究方案
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Mar 4;15:1322356. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1322356. eCollection 2024.
2
Prevalence of common mental disorders and treatment receipt for people from ethnic minority backgrounds in England: repeated cross-sectional surveys of the general population in 2007 and 2014.英格兰少数民族背景人群常见精神障碍的患病率和治疗率:2007 年和 2014 年一般人群的重复横断面调查。
Br J Psychiatry. 2022 Sep;221(3):520-527. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2021.179.
3
The Cultural Formulation Interview since DSM-5: Prospects for training, research, and clinical practice.DSM-5 后的文化构念访谈:培训、研究和临床实践的前景。
Transcult Psychiatry. 2020 Aug;57(4):496-514. doi: 10.1177/1363461520940481.
4
Patient and clinician communication practices during the DSM-5 cultural formulation interview field trial.在 DSM-5 文化构念访谈现场试验期间的患者和临床医生沟通实践。
Anthropol Med. 2020 Jun;27(2):192-211. doi: 10.1080/13648470.2019.1641014. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
5
Income inequality and psychological distress at neighbourhood and municipality level: An analysis in the Netherlands.收入不平等与邻里和市级水平的心理困扰:荷兰的分析。
Health Place. 2019 Mar;56:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2018.12.011. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
6
Cultural adaptations and therapist multicultural competence: Two meta-analytic reviews.文化适应和治疗师的多元文化能力:两项元分析综述。
J Clin Psychol. 2018 Nov;74(11):1907-1923. doi: 10.1002/jclp.22679. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
7
Culture and psychopathology.文化与精神病理学
Curr Opin Psychol. 2016 Apr;8:143-148. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.10.020. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
8
Culture in la clínica: Evaluating the utility of the Cultural Formulation Interview (CFI) in a Mexican outpatient setting.临床中的文化:评估文化定式访谈(CFI)在墨西哥门诊环境中的效用。
Transcult Psychiatry. 2017 Aug;54(4):466-487. doi: 10.1177/1363461517716051. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
9
Feasibility, acceptability and clinical utility of the Cultural Formulation Interview: mixed-methods results from the DSM-5 international field trial.文化诊断与访谈的可行性、可接受性和临床实用性:DSM-5 国际现场试验的混合方法结果。
Br J Psychiatry. 2017 Apr;210(4):290-297. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.116.193862. Epub 2017 Jan 19.
10
Does the Cultural Formulation Interview for the fifth revision of the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5) affect medical communication? A qualitative exploratory study from the New York site.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(第五版,DSM -5)的文化定式访谈是否会影响医学交流?来自纽约站点的一项定性探索性研究。
Ethn Health. 2015;20(1):1-28. doi: 10.1080/13557858.2013.857762. Epub 2013 Nov 15.

症状与背景:从文化定式访谈的大规模实施中吸取的经验教训

Symptom vs context: lessons learned from a large-scale implementation of the Cultural Formulation Interview.

作者信息

Silvius Linda, Antezana J Katrina V, Ghane Samrad

机构信息

Parnassia Academy, Parnassia Psychiatric Institute, The Hague, Netherlands.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2024 Sep 4;15:1410865. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1410865. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1410865
PMID:39296860
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11408998/
Abstract

Mental health services in multicultural societies require culturally sensitive approaches to reduce health disparities. The Cultural Formulation Interview (CFI) is thought to enhance shared decision making and to facilitate culturally and contextually informed treatment. There is, however, little known regarding its implementability in large-scale psychiatric services. The current paper reports on (a) efforts to implement the CFI in a large organization for mental health services in the Netherlands, and (b) two studies that evaluated this implementation process and identified barriers to CFI adoption in clinical practice. Implementation of the CFI was facilitated by developing an online course, an advanced training of "team coaches", (digital) resources, and integrating the CFI questions into the intake format. A preliminary evaluation revealed that the CFI was administered in only 13.2% of all intakes across the entire organization, with minimal utilization of training resources. aimed to investigate how the CFI was perceived by clinicians and stakeholders. A survey of 150 clinicians found a great lack of familiarity with the CFI and its purpose. While 67% reported partial CFI use, 50% saw no added value, and 61% deemed it relevant only for ethnic minorities. examined which patient and clinician variables were associated with adequate CFI use (i.e., correct documentation of the CFI information in initial intake reports). The sample consisted of 112 intakes of patients conducted by ten clinicians. Regression analysis showed a significant association between clinicians' cultural competences and adequate CFI use, meaning that more culturally competent clinicians tended to generate better cultural assessments using the CFI. In addition, the CFI information was documented more adequately among patients who were unemployed at the time of assessment. In conclusion, implementation of the CFI requires a fundamental rethinking of the entire intake assessment, shifting it from a symptom-oriented approach towards a context- and person-centered one. Future trainings may benefit from embedding the CFI within a broader cultural competency training, rather than solely focusing on the CFI, which is currently the common practice.

摘要

多元文化社会中的心理健康服务需要采用具有文化敏感性的方法来减少健康差距。文化定式访谈(CFI)被认为可以加强共同决策,并促进基于文化和背景的治疗。然而,对于其在大规模精神科服务中的可实施性却知之甚少。本文报告了(a)在荷兰一家大型心理健康服务机构中实施CFI的努力,以及(b)两项评估该实施过程并确定临床实践中采用CFI的障碍的研究。通过开发在线课程、对“团队教练”进行高级培训、(数字化)资源以及将CFI问题整合到接诊格式中来促进CFI的实施。初步评估显示,在整个机构的所有接诊中,仅13.2%进行了CFI,培训资源利用极少。旨在调查临床医生和利益相关者对CFI的看法。对150名临床医生的调查发现,他们对CFI及其目的非常缺乏了解。虽然67%的人报告部分使用了CFI,但50%的人认为没有附加值,61%的人认为它仅与少数族裔相关。研究了哪些患者和临床医生变量与充分使用CFI相关(即,在初始接诊报告中正确记录CFI信息)。样本包括由十位临床医生接诊的112名患者。回归分析显示临床医生的文化能力与充分使用CFI之间存在显著关联,这意味着文化能力更强的临床医生倾向于使用CFI进行更好的文化评估。此外,在评估时失业的患者中,CFI信息记录得更充分。总之,实施CFI需要对整个接诊评估进行根本性的重新思考,将其从以症状为导向的方法转变为以背景和人为中心的方法。未来的培训可能会受益于将CFI纳入更广泛的文化能力培训中,而不是像目前的常见做法那样仅专注于CFI。