Suppr超能文献

我们应该更聪明地还是更努力地工作来保持健康?基于强度和领域的时间使用构成的比较及其与认知和心血管代谢健康的关联。

Should We Work Smarter or Harder for Our Health? A Comparison of Intensity and Domain-Based Time-Use Compositions and Their Associations With Cognitive and Cardiometabolic Health.

机构信息

Alliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity (ARENA), Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2024 Nov 1;79(11). doi: 10.1093/gerona/glae233.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Each day is made up of a composition of "time-use behaviors." These can be classified by their intensity (eg, light or moderate-vigorous physical activity [PA]) or domain (eg, chores, socializing). Intensity-based time-use behaviors are linked with cognitive function and cardiometabolic health in older adults, but it is unknown whether these relationships differ depending on the domain (or type/context) of behavior.

METHODS

This study included 397 older adults (65.5 ± 3.0 years, 69% female, 16.0 ± 3.0 years education) from Adelaide and Newcastle, Australia. Time-use behaviors were recorded using the Multimedia Activity Recall for Children and Adults, cognitive function was measured using the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination III and Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, and waist-hip ratio were also recorded. Two 24-hour time-use compositions were derived from each participant's Multimedia Activity Recall for Children and Adults, including a 4-part intensity composition (sleep, sedentary behavior, light, and moderate-vigorous PA) and an 8-part domain composition (Sleep, Self-Care, Chores, Screen Time, Quiet Time, Household Administration, Sport/Exercise, and Social).

RESULTS

Linear regressions found significant associations between the domain composition and both Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination III (p = .010) and waist-hip ratio (p = .009), and between the intensity composition and waist-hip ratio (p = .025). Isotemporal substitution modeling demonstrated that the domains of sedentary behaviors and PA impacted their associations with Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination III, while any PA appeared beneficial for waist-hip ratio.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings suggest the domain of behavior should be considered when aiming to support cognitive function, whereas, for cardiometabolic health, it appears sufficient to promote any type of PA.

摘要

背景

每一天由“时间使用行为”组成。这些行为可以根据其强度(例如轻度或中度剧烈体力活动[PA])或域(例如家务、社交)进行分类。基于强度的时间使用行为与老年人的认知功能和心脏代谢健康有关,但尚不清楚这些关系是否因行为的域(或类型/背景)而异。

方法

本研究纳入了来自澳大利亚阿德莱德和纽卡斯尔的 397 名老年人(65.5±3.0 岁,69%为女性,教育年限 16.0±3.0 年)。使用多媒体活动回忆法记录时间使用行为,使用 Addenbrooke 的认知测验 III 和剑桥神经心理学测试自动化电池测量认知功能,还记录了收缩压、舒张压、总胆固醇和腰臀比。从每位参与者的多媒体活动回忆法中得出了两个 24 小时时间使用组成部分,包括 4 部分强度组成部分(睡眠、久坐行为、轻度和中度剧烈 PA)和 8 部分域组成部分(睡眠、自我护理、家务、屏幕时间、安静时间、家务管理、运动/锻炼和社交)。

结果

线性回归发现,域组成与 Addenbrooke 的认知测验 III(p=0.010)和腰臀比(p=0.009)之间存在显著关联,强度组成与腰臀比(p=0.025)之间也存在显著关联。等时替代建模表明,久坐行为和 PA 的域对其与 Addenbrooke 的认知测验 III 的关联有影响,而任何 PA 似乎对腰臀比都有益。

结论

研究结果表明,在旨在支持认知功能时,应考虑行为的域,而对于心脏代谢健康,似乎促进任何类型的 PA 就足够了。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b17f/11512025/6904e893808e/glae233_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验