Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Intensive Care, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Graduate Program in Child and Adolescent Health, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2024 Dec;59(12):3518-3523. doi: 10.1002/ppul.27245. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
In children with acute respiratory distress syndrome receiving mechanical ventilation, the peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) is close to plateau pressure (P) when inspiratory flow approaches zero. We aimed to evaluate the reliability of PIP to estimate P in infants with severe respiratory viral infection (SRVI), characterized by increased airway resistance, and the accuracy of an equational model to estimates P (eP) based on PIP.
This was a retrospective observational study including mechanically ventilated children (1 to 24 month old) with SRVI, whose respiratory mechanics measurements were performed to evaluate PIP and P The measured P was compared with the result of the equation: eP = PIP - [5.067 - (0.858 × static compliance) - (0.018 × inspiratory resistance) - (0.390 × pressure above positive-end expiratory pressure) + (4.989 × inspiratory time)].
Thirty-seven patients were included, with a median age of 3 (2-5) months. They presented a high inspiratory and expiratory resistance (136 ± 43 and 168 ± 66 cmHO/L/s, respectively) and a moderate reduction in static compliance: 0.75 ± 0.3 mL/kg/cmHO. PIP overestimated P (33 ± 3 and 26 ± 5 cmHO, p = 0.01), with a mean difference of 7.3 ± 4 cmHO. Moreover, the Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated a mean difference between P and eP of 1.0 ± 4.0 cmHO, with 95% limits of agreement of -6.9 and 8.8.
A significant difference between PIP and P was observed in infants with SRVI. The equation model was inaccurate for estimating P based on PIP. Any estimation of P from PIP needs to consider the resistance component of the respiratory system.
在接受机械通气的急性呼吸窘迫综合征儿童中,当吸气流量接近零时,吸气峰压(PIP)接近平台压(P)。我们旨在评估 PIP 估计严重呼吸道病毒感染(SRVI)婴儿中 P 的可靠性,这些婴儿的气道阻力增加,以及基于 PIP 估计 P 的方程(eP)的准确性。
这是一项回顾性观察研究,包括患有 SRVI 的机械通气患儿(1 至 24 个月龄),对其呼吸力学测量以评估 PIP 和 P。测量的 P 与方程的结果进行比较:eP=PIP-[5.067-(0.858×静态顺应性)-(0.018×吸气阻力)-(0.390×呼气末正压以上压力)+(4.989×吸气时间)]。
共纳入 37 例患儿,中位年龄为 3(2-5)个月。他们表现出高吸气和呼气阻力(分别为 136±43 和 168±66 cmHO/L/s)和中等程度的静态顺应性降低:0.75±0.3 mL/kg/cmHO。PIP 高估了 P(33±3 和 26±5 cmHO,p=0.01),平均差值为 7.3±4 cmHO。此外,Bland-Altman 分析显示 P 和 eP 之间的平均差值为 1.0±4.0 cmHO,95%一致性界限为-6.9 和 8.8。
在患有 SRVI 的婴儿中,PIP 和 P 之间存在显著差异。基于 PIP 的方程模型对估计 P 不准确。从 PIP 估计 P 需要考虑呼吸系统的阻力成分。